242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11387630)
1. Comparison of PowerPlex 16, PowerPlex1.1/2.1, and ABI AmpfISTR Profiler Plus/COfiler for forensic use.
Tomsey CS; Kurtz M; Kist F; Hockensmith M; Call P
Croat Med J; 2001 Jun; 42(3):239-43. PubMed ID: 11387630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of short tandem repeats (STRs) for forensic usage: performance testing of fluorescent multiplex STR systems and analysis of authentic and simulated forensic samples.
Moretti TR; Baumstark AL; Defenbaugh DA; Keys KM; Smerick JB; Budowle B
J Forensic Sci; 2001 May; 46(3):647-60. PubMed ID: 11373004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance evaluation of two multiplexes used in fluorescent short tandem repeat DNA analysis.
Buse EL; Putinier JC; Hong MM; Yap AE; Hartmann JM
J Forensic Sci; 2003 Mar; 48(2):348-57. PubMed ID: 12664993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. TWGDAM validation of AmpFlSTR PCR amplification kits for forensic DNA casework.
Holt CL; Buoncristiani M; Wallin JM; Nguyen T; Lazaruk KD; Walsh PS
J Forensic Sci; 2002 Jan; 47(1):66-96. PubMed ID: 12064672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of a 16-locus fluorescent multiplex system.
Krenke BE; Tereba A; Anderson SJ; Buel E; Culhane S; Finis CJ; Tomsey CS; Zachetti JM; Masibay A; Rabbach DR; Amiott EA; Sprecher CJ
J Forensic Sci; 2002 Jul; 47(4):773-85. PubMed ID: 12136984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Case work guidelines and interpretation of short tandem repeat complex mixture analysis.
Tomsey CS; Kurtz M; Flowers B; Fumea J; Giles B; Kucherer S
Croat Med J; 2001 Jun; 42(3):276-80. PubMed ID: 11387638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of STR typing by capillary electrophoresis.
Moretti TR; Baumstark AL; Defenbaugh DA; Keys KM; Brown AL; Budowle B
J Forensic Sci; 2001 May; 46(3):661-76. PubMed ID: 11373005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation and implementation of the PowerPlex 16 BIO System STR multiplex for forensic casework.
Greenspoon SA; Ban JD; Pablo L; Crouse CA; Kist FG; Tomsey CS; Glessner AL; Mihalacki LR; Long TM; Heidebrecht BJ; Braunstein CA; Freeman DA; Soberalski C; Nathan B; Amin AS; Douglas EK; Schumm JW
J Forensic Sci; 2004 Jan; 49(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 14979347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis and interpretation of short tandem repeat microvariants and three-banded allele patterns using multiple allele detection systems.
Crouse CA; Rogers S; Amiott E; Gibson S; Masibay A
J Forensic Sci; 1999 Jan; 44(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 9987875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. TWGDAM validation of a nine-locus and a four-locus fluorescent STR multiplex system.
Micka KA; Amiott EA; Hockenberry TL; Sprecher CJ; Lins AM; Rabbach DR; Taylor JA; Bacher JW; Glidewell DE; Gibson SD; Crouse CA; Schumm JW
J Forensic Sci; 1999 Nov; 44(6):1243-57. PubMed ID: 10582363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rapid and high-throughput forensic short tandem repeat typing using a 96-lane microfabricated capillary array electrophoresis microdevice.
Yeung SH; Greenspoon SA; McGuckian A; Crouse CA; Emrich CA; Ban J; Mathies RA
J Forensic Sci; 2006 Jul; 51(4):740-7. PubMed ID: 16882214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. DNA typing from skeletal remains: evaluation of multiplex and megaplex STR systems on DNA isolated from bone and teeth samples.
Alonso A; Andelinović S; Martín P; Sutlović D; Erceg I; Huffine E; de Simón LF; Albarrán C; Definis-Gojanović M; Fernández-Rodriguez A; García P; Drmić I; Rezić B; Kuret S; Sancho M; Primorac D
Croat Med J; 2001 Jun; 42(3):260-6. PubMed ID: 11387635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of a male-specific, 12-locus fluorescent short tandem repeat (STR) multiplex.
Krenke BE; Viculis L; Richard ML; Prinz M; Milne SC; Ladd C; Gross AM; Gornall T; Frappier JR; Eisenberg AJ; Barna C; Aranda XG; Adamowicz MS; Budowle B
Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Feb; 148(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 15607584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. TWGDAM validation of the AmpFISTR blue PCR amplification kit for forensic casework analysis.
Wallin JM; Buoncristiani MR; Lazaruk KD; Fildes N; Holt CL; Walsh PS
J Forensic Sci; 1998 Jul; 43(4):854-70. PubMed ID: 9670511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characterization and validation studies of powerPlex 2.1, a nine-locus short tandem repeat (STR) multiplex system and penta D monoplex.
Levedakou EN; Freeman DA; Budzynski MJ; Early BE; Damaso RC; Pollard AM; Townley AJ; Gombos JL; Lewis JL; Kist FG; Hockensmith ME; Terwilliger ML; Amiott E; McElfresh KC; Schumm JW; Ulery SR; Konotop F; Sessa TL; Sailus JS; Crouse CA; Tomsey CS; Ban JD; Nelson MS
J Forensic Sci; 2002 Jul; 47(4):757-72. PubMed ID: 12136983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Concordance study on population database samples using the PowerPlex 16 kit and AmpFlSTR Profiler Plus kit and AmpFlSTR COfiler kit.
Budowle B; Sprecher CJ
J Forensic Sci; 2001 May; 46(3):637-41. PubMed ID: 11373002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. AmpFlSTR profiler Plus short tandem repeat DNA analysis of casework samples, mixture samples, and nonhuman DNA samples amplified under reduced PCR volume conditions (25 microL).
Frégeau CJ; Bowen KL; Leclair B; Trudel I; Bishop L; Fourney RM
J Forensic Sci; 2003 Sep; 48(5):1014-34. PubMed ID: 14535664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of human fecal material for autosomal and Y chromosome STRs.
Roy R
J Forensic Sci; 2003 Sep; 48(5):1035-40. PubMed ID: 14535665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of the AmpFlSTR Profiler Plus PCR amplification kit for use in forensic casework.
Frank WE; Llewellyn BE; Fish PA; Riech AK; Marcacci TL; Gandor DW; Parker D; Carter RR; Thibault SM
J Forensic Sci; 2001 May; 46(3):642-6. PubMed ID: 11373003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Powerplex® ES versus Powerplex® S5--casework testing of the new screening kit.
Poetsch M; Kamphausen T; Bajanowski T; Schwark T; von Wurmb-Schwark N
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Jan; 5(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 20457034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
