132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11387638)
1. Case work guidelines and interpretation of short tandem repeat complex mixture analysis.
Tomsey CS; Kurtz M; Flowers B; Fumea J; Giles B; Kucherer S
Croat Med J; 2001 Jun; 42(3):276-80. PubMed ID: 11387638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of PowerPlex 16, PowerPlex1.1/2.1, and ABI AmpfISTR Profiler Plus/COfiler for forensic use.
Tomsey CS; Kurtz M; Kist F; Hockensmith M; Call P
Croat Med J; 2001 Jun; 42(3):239-43. PubMed ID: 11387630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mixture interpretation: defining the relevant features for guidelines for the assessment of mixed DNA profiles in forensic casework.
Budowle B; Onorato AJ; Callaghan TF; Della Manna A; Gross AM; Guerrieri RA; Luttman JC; McClure DL
J Forensic Sci; 2009 Jul; 54(4):810-21. PubMed ID: 19368620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of a male-specific, 12-locus fluorescent short tandem repeat (STR) multiplex.
Krenke BE; Viculis L; Richard ML; Prinz M; Milne SC; Ladd C; Gross AM; Gornall T; Frappier JR; Eisenberg AJ; Barna C; Aranda XG; Adamowicz MS; Budowle B
Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Feb; 148(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 15607584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. AmpFlSTR profiler Plus short tandem repeat DNA analysis of casework samples, mixture samples, and nonhuman DNA samples amplified under reduced PCR volume conditions (25 microL).
Frégeau CJ; Bowen KL; Leclair B; Trudel I; Bishop L; Fourney RM
J Forensic Sci; 2003 Sep; 48(5):1014-34. PubMed ID: 14535664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. TWGDAM validation of AmpFlSTR PCR amplification kits for forensic DNA casework.
Holt CL; Buoncristiani M; Wallin JM; Nguyen T; Lazaruk KD; Walsh PS
J Forensic Sci; 2002 Jan; 47(1):66-96. PubMed ID: 12064672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Least-square deconvolution: a framework for interpreting short tandem repeat mixtures.
Wang T; Xue N; Birdwell JD
J Forensic Sci; 2006 Nov; 51(6):1284-97. PubMed ID: 17199614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Internal validation of the AmpFlSTR Yfiler amplification kit for use in forensic casework.
Gross AM; Liberty AA; Ulland MM; Kuriger JK
J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jan; 53(1):125-34. PubMed ID: 18005009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. SWGDAM developmental validation of a 19-locus Y-STR system for forensic casework.
Daniels DL; Hall AM; Ballantyne J
J Forensic Sci; 2004 Jul; 49(4):668-83. PubMed ID: 15317180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. DNA commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: Recommendations on the interpretation of mixtures.
Gill P; Brenner CH; Buckleton JS; Carracedo A; Krawczak M; Mayr WR; Morling N; Prinz M; Schneider PM; Weir BS;
Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Jul; 160(2-3):90-101. PubMed ID: 16750605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. When autosomal short tandem repeats fail: optimized primer and reaction design for Y-chromosome short tandem repeat analysis in forensic casework.
Parson W; Niederstätter H; Köchl S; Steinlechner M; Berger B
Croat Med J; 2001 Jun; 42(3):285-7. PubMed ID: 11387640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of a 16-locus fluorescent multiplex system.
Krenke BE; Tereba A; Anderson SJ; Buel E; Culhane S; Finis CJ; Tomsey CS; Zachetti JM; Masibay A; Rabbach DR; Amiott EA; Sprecher CJ
J Forensic Sci; 2002 Jul; 47(4):773-85. PubMed ID: 12136984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Y chromosome-specific short tandem repeats in forensic casework.
Prinz M; Sansone M
Croat Med J; 2001 Jun; 42(3):288-91. PubMed ID: 11387641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Systematic analysis of stutter percentages and allele peak height and peak area ratios at heterozygous STR loci for forensic casework and database samples.
Leclair B; Frégeau CJ; Bowen KL; Fourney RM
J Forensic Sci; 2004 Sep; 49(5):968-80. PubMed ID: 15461097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation and implementation of the PowerPlex 16 BIO System STR multiplex for forensic casework.
Greenspoon SA; Ban JD; Pablo L; Crouse CA; Kist FG; Tomsey CS; Glessner AL; Mihalacki LR; Long TM; Heidebrecht BJ; Braunstein CA; Freeman DA; Soberalski C; Nathan B; Amin AS; Douglas EK; Schumm JW
J Forensic Sci; 2004 Jan; 49(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 14979347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. DNA Commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics (ISFG): an update of the recommendations on the use of Y-STRs in forensic analysis.
Gusmão L; Butler JM; Carracedo A; Gill P; Kayser M; Mayr WR; Morling N; Prinz M; Roewer L; Tyler-Smith C; Schneider PM;
Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Mar; 157(2-3):187-97. PubMed ID: 15913936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development and validation of a multiplexed Y-chromosome STR genotyping system, Y-PLEX 6, for forensic casework.
Sinha SK; Budowle B; Arcot SS; Richey SL; Chakrabor R; Jones MD; Wojtkiewicz PW; Schoenbauer DA; Gross AM; Sinha SK; Shewale JG
J Forensic Sci; 2003 Jan; 48(1):93-103. PubMed ID: 12570206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance evaluation of two multiplexes used in fluorescent short tandem repeat DNA analysis.
Buse EL; Putinier JC; Hong MM; Yap AE; Hartmann JM
J Forensic Sci; 2003 Mar; 48(2):348-57. PubMed ID: 12664993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comment on "Low copy number typing has yet to achieve "general acceptance"" by Budowle, B., et al., 2009. Forensic Sci. Int. Genetics: Supplement Series 2, 551-552.
Caragine T; Prinz M
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Jan; 5(1):3-4; discussion 5-7. PubMed ID: 20457110
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Forensic mitochondrial DNA analysis: two years of commercial casework experience in the United States.
Melton T; Nelson K
Croat Med J; 2001 Jun; 42(3):298-303. PubMed ID: 11387643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
