These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11387639)

  • 1. Operating and managing a statewide DNA program.
    Ban JD
    Croat Med J; 2001 Jun; 42(3):281-4. PubMed ID: 11387639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Establishing a large DNA data bank using the PowerPlex 1.1 and 2.1 systems.
    Ban JD
    Croat Med J; 2001 Jun; 42(3):256-9. PubMed ID: 11387634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implementation of forensic DNA analysis on casework evidence at the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Crime Laboratory: historical perspective.
    Crouse CA
    Croat Med J; 2001 Jun; 42(3):247-51. PubMed ID: 11387632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The New Zealand DNA databank: its development and significance as a crime solving tool.
    Harbison SA; Hamilton JF; Walsh SJ
    Sci Justice; 2001; 41(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 11215296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identification of missing persons: the Spanish "Phoenix" program.
    Lorente JA; Entrala C; Alvarez JC; Arce B; Heinrichs B; Lorente M; Carrasco F; Budowle B; Villanueva E
    Croat Med J; 2001 Jun; 42(3):267-70. PubMed ID: 11387636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving efficiency of a small forensic DNA laboratory: validation of robotic assays and evaluation of microcapillary array device.
    Crouse CA; Yeung S; Greenspoon S; McGuckian A; Sikorsky J; Ban J; Mathies R
    Croat Med J; 2005 Aug; 46(4):563-77. PubMed ID: 16100759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Allowing new technology to erode constitutional protections: a Fourth Amendment challenge to non-consensual DNA testing of prisoners.
    Love SH
    Villanova Law Rev; 1993; 38(5):1617-60. PubMed ID: 11653232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Forensic utilization of familial searches in DNA databases.
    Gershaw CJ; Schweighardt AJ; Rourke LC; Wallace MM
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Jan; 5(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 20739248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genetic witness: forensic uses of DNA tests.
    Nishimi RY; O'Connor KW; Gwin HL; Anderson MA
    J Int Bioethique; 1991; 2(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 11651050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. NIST mixed stain studies #1 and #2: interlaboratory comparison of DNA quantification practice and short tandem repeat multiplex performance with multiple-source samples.
    Duewer DL; Kline MC; Redman JW; Newall PJ; Reeder DJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2001 Sep; 46(5):1199-210. PubMed ID: 11569565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. TWGDAM validation of AmpFlSTR PCR amplification kits for forensic DNA casework.
    Holt CL; Buoncristiani M; Wallin JM; Nguyen T; Lazaruk KD; Walsh PS
    J Forensic Sci; 2002 Jan; 47(1):66-96. PubMed ID: 12064672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance evaluation of two multiplexes used in fluorescent short tandem repeat DNA analysis.
    Buse EL; Putinier JC; Hong MM; Yap AE; Hartmann JM
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 Mar; 48(2):348-57. PubMed ID: 12664993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scientific standards for studies in forensic genetics.
    Schneider PM
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Jan; 165(2-3):238-43. PubMed ID: 16875790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Utility of the Y-STR typing systems Y-PLEX 6 and Y-PLEX 5 in forensic casework and 11 Y-STR haplotype database for three major population groups in the United States.
    Sinha SK; Budowle B; Chakraborty R; Paunovic A; Guidry RD; Larsen C; Lal A; Shaffer M; Pineda G; Sinha SK; Schneida E; Nasir H; Shewale JG
    J Forensic Sci; 2004 Jul; 49(4):691-700. PubMed ID: 15317182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using hydrophilic adhesive tape for collection of evidence for forensic DNA analysis.
    Li RC; Harris HA
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 Nov; 48(6):1318-21. PubMed ID: 14640278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation and implementation of the PowerPlex 16 BIO System STR multiplex for forensic casework.
    Greenspoon SA; Ban JD; Pablo L; Crouse CA; Kist FG; Tomsey CS; Glessner AL; Mihalacki LR; Long TM; Heidebrecht BJ; Braunstein CA; Freeman DA; Soberalski C; Nathan B; Amin AS; Douglas EK; Schumm JW
    J Forensic Sci; 2004 Jan; 49(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 14979347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The feasibility of external blind DNA proficiency testing. II. Experience with actual blind tests.
    Peterson JL; Lin G; Ho M; Chen Y; Gaensslen RE
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 Jan; 48(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 12570196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Forensic aspects of mass disasters: strategic considerations for DNA-based human identification.
    Budowle B; Bieber FR; Eisenberg AJ
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2005 Jul; 7(4):230-43. PubMed ID: 15975517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A review of state legislation on DNA forensic data banking.
    McEwen JE; Reilly PR
    Am J Hum Genet; 1994 Jun; 54(6):941-58. PubMed ID: 8198138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimization of a simple, automatable extraction method to recover sufficient DNA from low copy number DNA samples for generation of short tandem repeat profiles.
    Schiffner LA; Bajda EJ; Prinz M; Sebestyen J; Shaler R; Caragine TA
    Croat Med J; 2005 Aug; 46(4):578-86. PubMed ID: 16100760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.