133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11388074)
1. Alec Samuels puts the case that the company doctor owes little, if any, duty of care to employees or prospective employees.
Waldron T
Med Leg J; 2001; 69(Pt 1):50. PubMed ID: 11388074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A physician's duty to inform of newly developed therapy.
Prillaman HL
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1990; 6():43-58. PubMed ID: 10105338
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The abortion alternative and the patient's right to know.
Shapiro SC
Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1979 Dec; (10):5-48. PubMed ID: 10295000
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Medical responsibility and legal malpractice].
Boxho P
Rev Med Liege; 2001 Jan; 56(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 11256138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Procedures for diagnosis of occupational diseases].
Graser M; Manaouil C; Jardé O
Presse Med; 2003 May; 32(18):821-5. PubMed ID: 12870383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The rationale behind the informed consent doctrine.
Andrews LB
J Med Pract Manage; 1985 Jul; 1(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 10281819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Online without a net: physician-patient communication by electronic mail.
Spielberg AR
Am J Law Med; 1999; 25(2-3):267-95. PubMed ID: 10476331
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Marketplace. Doctors subject to malpractice cases even when the person they treat isn't a patient.
Moskowitz DB
Med Health; 2001 Mar; 55(10):suppl 1-2. PubMed ID: 11258103
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The duty of care of the occupational physician in assessing job applicants.
Seabrook R; Collins B
Occup Med (Lond); 1999 Apr; 49(3):189-92. PubMed ID: 10451601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Confidentiality and the law.
Green C
Nurs Times; 1999 Feb 17-23; 95(7):53-5. PubMed ID: 10326493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The duty of the doctor to inform the patient of the risks: a sort of riposte to Mr Garfield.
Samuels A
Med Leg J; 2014 Mar; 82(1):41-2. PubMed ID: 24619846
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Decision making for incompetent patients by designated proxy. California's new law.
Steinbrook R; Lo B
N Engl J Med; 1984 Jun; 310(24):1598-601. PubMed ID: 6727927
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [The physician's professional responsibilities, especially the responsibility for patient education].
Fuchs S; Menter M
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1997; 135(5):468-71. PubMed ID: 9446442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The "rights" of a patient in a doctor-patient relationship.
Parsons GS; Parsons MA
S C Dent J; 1978; 36(4):29-37. PubMed ID: 296574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Virtues and informed consent.
Orth OG
Mo Med; 1997 May; 94(5):216-20. PubMed ID: 9144992
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A child's right to health care.
Picard E
Dimens Health Serv; 1979 May; 56(5):60-1. PubMed ID: 446952
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Physician authority for unilateral DNR orders.
Marsh FH; Staver A
J Leg Med; 1991 Jun; 12(2):115-65. PubMed ID: 1885937
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The surgical oncology patient: provider obligations and legal rights.
Waller DB
Nurs Clin North Am; 2001 Sep; 36(3):617-23, xii. PubMed ID: 11532674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accountability and critical care.
Dimond B
Intensive Care Nurs; 1991 Jun; 7(2):86-93. PubMed ID: 2061590
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Informed consent: a confusing concept.
Fay MF
Todays OR Nurse; 1986 Jul; 8(7):6-10. PubMed ID: 3638051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
