792 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11389271)
41. Comparison of the efficacy of three topical antiseptic solutions for the prevention of catheter colonization: a multicenter randomized controlled study.
Yasuda H; Sanui M; Abe T; Shime N; Komuro T; Hatakeyama J; Matsukubo S; Kawano S; Yamamoto H; Andoh K; Seo R; Inoue K; Noda E; Saito N; Nogami S; Okamoto K; Fuke R; Gushima Y; Kobayashi A; Takebayashi T; Lefor AK;
Crit Care; 2017 Dec; 21(1):320. PubMed ID: 29268759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Cost-effectiveness analysis of chlorhexidine gluconate compared with povidone-iodine solution for catheter-site care in Siriraj Hospital, Thailand.
Maenthaisong R; Chaiyakunapruk N; Thamlikitkul V
J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Nov; 89 Suppl 5():S94-101. PubMed ID: 17718250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Central venous catheter colonization in critically ill patients: a prospective, randomized, controlled study comparing standard with two antiseptic-impregnated catheters.
Dünser MW; Mayr AJ; Hinterberger G; Flörl CL; Ulmer H; Schmid S; Friesenecker B; Lorenz I; Hasibeder WR
Anesth Analg; 2005 Dec; 101(6):1778-1784. PubMed ID: 16301258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Maintenance antisepsis in reducing the rate of late-onset central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection: A comparison of 0.05% and 1% chlorhexidine.
Kikuchi M; Sato T; Okada S; Abe N; Sato A; Suzuki Y
J Infect Chemother; 2020 Feb; 26(2):188-193. PubMed ID: 31495567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Chlorhexidine-impregnated sponges and less frequent dressing changes for prevention of catheter-related infections in critically ill adults: a randomized controlled trial.
Timsit JF; Schwebel C; Bouadma L; Geffroy A; Garrouste-Orgeas M; Pease S; Herault MC; Haouache H; Calvino-Gunther S; Gestin B; Armand-Lefevre L; Leflon V; Chaplain C; Benali A; Francais A; Adrie C; Zahar JR; Thuong M; Arrault X; Croize J; Lucet JC;
JAMA; 2009 Mar; 301(12):1231-41. PubMed ID: 19318651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Chlorhexidine-based antiseptic solution vs alcohol-based povidone-iodine for central venous catheter care.
Mimoz O; Villeminey S; Ragot S; Dahyot-Fizelier C; Laksiri L; Petitpas F; Debaene B
Arch Intern Med; 2007 Oct; 167(19):2066-72. PubMed ID: 17954800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Prevention of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection by use of an antiseptic-impregnated catheter. A randomized, controlled trial.
Maki DG; Stolz SM; Wheeler S; Mermel LA
Ann Intern Med; 1997 Aug; 127(4):257-66. PubMed ID: 9265424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Chlorhexidine compared with povidone-iodine solution for vascular catheter-site care: a meta-analysis.
Chaiyakunapruk N; Veenstra DL; Lipsky BA; Saint S
Ann Intern Med; 2002 Jun; 136(11):792-801. PubMed ID: 12044127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Dressing and securement for central venous access devices (CVADs): A Cochrane systematic review.
Ullman AJ; Cooke ML; Mitchell M; Lin F; New K; Long DA; Mihala G; Rickard CM
Int J Nurs Stud; 2016 Jul; 59():177-96. PubMed ID: 27222463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Chlorhexidine plus alcohol versus povidone iodine plus alcohol, combined or not with innovative devices, for prevention of short-term peripheral venous catheter infection and failure (CLEAN 3 study): an investigator-initiated, open-label, single centre, randomised-controlled, two-by-two factorial trial.
Guenezan J; Marjanovic N; Drugeon B; Neill RO; Liuu E; Roblot F; Palazzo P; Bironneau V; Prevost F; Paul J; Pichon M; Boisson M; Frasca D; Mimoz O;
Lancet Infect Dis; 2021 Jul; 21(7):1038-1048. PubMed ID: 33539734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Reduction of catheter-related colonisation by the use of a silver zeolite-impregnated central vascular catheter in adult critical care.
Khare MD; Bukhari SS; Swann A; Spiers P; McLaren I; Myers J
J Infect; 2007 Feb; 54(2):146-50. PubMed ID: 16678904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Efficiency of chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine-impregnated venous catheters at subclavian sites.
Lorente L; Lecuona M; Jiménez A; Lorenzo L; Santacreu R; Ramos S; Hurtado E; Buitrago M; Mora ML
Am J Infect Control; 2015 Jul; 43(7):711-4. PubMed ID: 25934065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Benefits of minocycline and rifampin-impregnated central venous catheters. A prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled, multicenter trial.
León C; Ruiz-Santana S; Rello J; de la Torre MV; Vallés J; Alvarez-Lerma F; Sierra R; Saavedra P; Alvarez-Salgado F;
Intensive Care Med; 2004 Oct; 30(10):1891-9. PubMed ID: 15278273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Efficacy of antiseptic-impregnated catheters on catheter colonization and catheter-related bloodstream infections in patients in an intensive care unit.
Osma S; Kahveci SF; Kaya FN; Akalin H; Ozakin C; Yilmaz E; Kutlay O
J Hosp Infect; 2006 Feb; 62(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 16307824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Comparison of chlorhexidine impregnated dressing and standard dressing for the prevention of central-line associated blood stream infection and colonization in critically ill pediatric patients: A randomized controlled trial.
Duyu M; Karakaya Z; Yazici P; Yavuz S; Yersel NM; Tascilar MO; Firat N; Bozkurt O; Caglar Mocan Y
Pediatr Int; 2022 Jan; 64(1):e15011. PubMed ID: 34610185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Targeting zero catheter-related bloodstream infections in pediatric intensive care unit: a retrospective matched case-control study.
Biasucci DG; Pittiruti M; Taddei A; Picconi E; Pizza A; Celentano D; Piastra M; Scoppettuolo G; Conti G
J Vasc Access; 2018 Mar; 19(2):119-124. PubMed ID: 29148002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Randomized controlled trial of chlorhexidine dressing and highly adhesive dressing for preventing catheter-related infections in critically ill adults.
Timsit JF; Mimoz O; Mourvillier B; Souweine B; Garrouste-Orgeas M; Alfandari S; Plantefeve G; Bronchard R; Troche G; Gauzit R; Antona M; Canet E; Bohe J; Lepape A; Vesin A; Arrault X; Schwebel C; Adrie C; Zahar JR; Ruckly S; Tournegros C; Lucet JC
Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2012 Dec; 186(12):1272-8. PubMed ID: 23043083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Effect of chlorhexidine/silver sulfadiazine-impregnated central venous catheters in an intensive care unit with a low blood stream infection rate after implementation of an educational program: a before-after trial.
Schuerer DJ; Zack JE; Thomas J; Borecki IB; Sona CS; Schallom ME; Venker M; Nemeth JL; Ward MR; Verjan L; Warren DK; Fraser VJ; Mazuski JE; Boyle WA; Buchman TG; Coopersmith CM
Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2007 Aug; 8(4):445-54. PubMed ID: 17883361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Early prophylaxis of central venous catheter-related thrombosis using 1% chlorhexidine gluconate and chlorhexidine-gel-impregnated dressings: a retrospective cohort study.
Yamashita T; Takamori A; Nakagawachi A; Tanigawa Y; Hamada Y; Aoki Y; Sakaguchi Y
Sci Rep; 2020 Sep; 10(1):15952. PubMed ID: 32994455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Comparative Efficacy of Antimicrobial Central Venous Catheters in Reducing Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections in Adults: Abridged Cochrane Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Chong HY; Lai NM; Apisarnthanarak A; Chaiyakunapruk N
Clin Infect Dis; 2017 May; 64(suppl_2):S131-S140. PubMed ID: 28475779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
