232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11390042)
1. Comparative ability of EMG, optimization, and hybrid modelling approaches to predict trunk muscle forces and lumbar spine loading during dynamic sagittal plane lifting.
Gagnon D; Larivière C; Loisel P
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2001 Jun; 16(5):359-72. PubMed ID: 11390042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An EMG-assisted model of trunk loading during free-dynamic lifting.
Granata KP; Marras WS
J Biomech; 1995 Nov; 28(11):1309-17. PubMed ID: 8522544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of muscle forces and joint load from an optimization and EMG assisted lumbar spine model: towards development of a hybrid approach.
Cholewicki J; McGill SM; Norman RW
J Biomech; 1995 Mar; 28(3):321-31. PubMed ID: 7730390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of trunk muscle forces and spinal loads estimated by two biomechanical models.
Arjmand N; Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Aug; 24(7):533-41. PubMed ID: 19493597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An EMG technique for measuring spinal loading during asymmetric lifting.
Dolan P; Kingma I; De Looze MP; van Dieen JH; Toussaint HM; Baten CT; Adams MA
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2001; 16 Suppl 1():S17-24. PubMed ID: 11275339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A biomechanical comparison between expert and novice manual materials handlers using a multi-joint EMG-assisted optimization musculoskeletal model of the lumbar spine.
Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Larivière C
J Biomech; 2016 Sep; 49(13):2938-2945. PubMed ID: 27469898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of trunk muscle coactivity on dynamic spinal loads.
Granata KP; Marras WS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Apr; 20(8):913-9. PubMed ID: 7644956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of biomechanical parameters in the lumbar spine during static sagittal plane lifting.
Kong WZ; Goel VK; Gilbertson LG
J Biomech Eng; 1998 Apr; 120(2):273-80. PubMed ID: 10412390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of lumbar spine and muscle loading between male and female workers during box transfers.
Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Larivière C
J Biomech; 2018 Nov; 81():76-85. PubMed ID: 30286979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of backpack load on critical changes of trunk muscle activation and lumbar spine loading during walking.
Li SSW; Chow DHK
Ergonomics; 2018 Apr; 61(4):553-565. PubMed ID: 28791922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An EMG-assisted model of loads on the lumbar spine during asymmetric trunk extensions.
Granata KP; Marras WS
J Biomech; 1993 Dec; 26(12):1429-38. PubMed ID: 8308047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robust estimation of lumbar joint forces in symmetric and asymmetric lifting tasks via large-scale electromyography-driven musculoskeletal models.
Moya-Esteban A; van der Kooij H; Sartori M
J Biomech; 2022 Nov; 144():111307. PubMed ID: 36191432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of trunk muscle forces, spinal loads and stability estimated by one stability- and three EMG-assisted optimization approaches.
Mohammadi Y; Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A
Med Eng Phys; 2015 Aug; 37(8):792-800. PubMed ID: 26117333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanics of changes in lumbar posture in static lifting.
Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Dec; 30(23):2637-48. PubMed ID: 16319750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of posture on dynamic back loading during a cable lifting task.
Gallagher S; Marras WS; Davis KG; Kovacs K
Ergonomics; 2002 Apr; 45(5):380-98. PubMed ID: 12028722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Flexion relaxation during lifting: implications for torque production by muscle activity and tissue strain at the lumbo-sacral joint.
Toussaint HM; de Winter AF; de Haas Y; de Looze MP; Van Dieën JH; Kingma I
J Biomech; 1995 Feb; 28(2):199-210. PubMed ID: 7896862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The relationship between trunk muscle electromyography and lifting moments in the sagittal and frontal planes.
Seroussi RE; Pope MH
J Biomech; 1987; 20(2):135-46. PubMed ID: 3571294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Foot positioning instruction, initial vertical load position and lifting technique: effects on low back loading.
Kingma I; Bosch T; Bruins L; van Dieën JH
Ergonomics; 2004 Oct; 47(13):1365-85. PubMed ID: 15513714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An improved multi-joint EMG-assisted optimization approach to estimate joint and muscle forces in a musculoskeletal model of the lumbar spine.
Gagnon D; Arjmand N; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C
J Biomech; 2011 May; 44(8):1521-9. PubMed ID: 21439569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. EMG assisted optimization: a hybrid approach for estimating muscle forces in an indeterminate biomechanical model.
Cholewicki J; McGill SM
J Biomech; 1994 Oct; 27(10):1287-9. PubMed ID: 7962016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
