These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11390332)

  • 1. Comparison of telephone sampling and area sampling: response rates and within-household coverage.
    Brogan DJ; Denniston MM; Liff JM; Flagg EW; Coates RJ; Brinton LA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2001 Jun; 153(11):1119-27. PubMed ID: 11390332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of random digit dialing as a method of control selection in case-control studies.
    Olson SH; Kelsey JL; Pearson TA; Levin B
    Am J Epidemiol; 1992 Jan; 135(2):210-22. PubMed ID: 1536136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The evaluation of the data collection process for a multicenter, population-based, case-control design.
    Wingo PA; Ory HW; Layde PM; Lee NC
    Am J Epidemiol; 1988 Jul; 128(1):206-17. PubMed ID: 3381827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability of random digit dialing calls to enumerate an adult female population.
    Glaser SL; Stearns CB
    Am J Epidemiol; 2002 May; 155(10):972-5. PubMed ID: 11994238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The efficacy of random digit dialing in selecting matched controls for a case-control study of pediatric cancer.
    Ward EM; Kramer S; Meadows AT
    Am J Epidemiol; 1984 Oct; 120(4):582-91. PubMed ID: 6475927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Telephone household screening and interviewing.
    Harlow BL; Hartge P
    Am J Epidemiol; 1983 May; 117(5):632-3. PubMed ID: 6846319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Random digit dialing: the potential effect on sample characteristics of the conversion of nonresidential telephone numbers.
    Voigt LF; Davis S; Heuser L
    Am J Epidemiol; 1992 Dec; 136(11):1393-9. PubMed ID: 1488966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Qualitative and quantitative assessment of geographic clustering of population samples selected using different methods of random digit dialing.
    Davis S; Ross A; Voigt LF; Heuser L
    Am J Epidemiol; 1990 Jul; 132(1 Suppl):S144-55. PubMed ID: 2356827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Alternative strategies for selecting population controls: comparison of random digit dialing and targeted telephone calls.
    Funkhouser E; Macaluso M; Wang X
    Ann Epidemiol; 2000 Jan; 10(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 10658689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Two one-step methods for household screening and interviewing using random digit dialing.
    Harlow BL; Davis S
    Am J Epidemiol; 1988 Apr; 127(4):857-63. PubMed ID: 3354550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sampling elderly in the community: a comparison of commercial telemarketing lists and random digit dialing techniques for assessing health behaviors and health status.
    Psaty BM; Cheadle A; Curry S; McKenna T; Koepsell TD; Wickizer T; VonKorff M; Diehr P; Perrin EB; Wagner EH
    Am J Epidemiol; 1991 Jul; 134(1):96-106. PubMed ID: 1853865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Random digit dialing for control selection. A review and a caution on its use in studies of childhood cancer.
    Greenberg ER
    Am J Epidemiol; 1990 Jan; 131(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 2403464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Use of Multimode Data Collection in Random Digit Dialing Cell Phone Surveys for Young Adults: Feasibility Study.
    Gundersen DA; Wivagg J; Young WJ; Yan T; Delnevo CD
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Dec; 23(12):e31545. PubMed ID: 34932017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparability of telephone and household breast cancer screening surveys with differing response rates.
    Mickey RM; Worden JK; Vacek PM; Skelly JM; Costanza MC
    Epidemiology; 1994 Jul; 5(4):462-5. PubMed ID: 7918818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Feasibility of including cellular telephone numbers in random digit dialing for epidemiologic case-control studies.
    Voigt LF; Schwartz SM; Doody DR; Lee SC; Li CI
    Am J Epidemiol; 2011 Jan; 173(1):118-26. PubMed ID: 21071602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Response rates to random digit dialing for recruiting participants to an onsite health study.
    Pavlik VN; Hyman DJ; Vallbona C; Dunn JK; Louis K; Dewey CM; Wieck L; Toronjo C
    Public Health Rep; 1996; 111(5):444-50. PubMed ID: 8837634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selection of control groups by using a commercial database and random digit dialing.
    Olson SH; Mignone L; Harlap S
    Am J Epidemiol; 2000 Sep; 152(6):585-92. PubMed ID: 10997549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Random digit dialing in selecting a population-based control group.
    Hartge P; Brinton LA; Rosenthal JF; Cahill JI; Hoover RN; Waksberg J
    Am J Epidemiol; 1984 Dec; 120(6):825-33. PubMed ID: 6334439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of control subjects recruited by random digit dialing and area survey.
    Lele C; Holly EA; Roseman DS; Thomas DB
    Am J Epidemiol; 1994 Oct; 140(7):643-8. PubMed ID: 7942764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of bias and logistics in a survey of adults at increased risk for oral health decrements.
    Gilbert GH; Duncan RP; Kulley AM; Coward RT; Heft MW
    J Public Health Dent; 1997; 57(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 9150063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.