241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11391611)
1. DNA cytometry confirms the utility of the Bethesda system for the classification of Papanicolaou smears.
Bollmann R; Bollmann M; Henson DE; Bodo M
Cancer; 2001 Jun; 93(3):222-8. PubMed ID: 11391611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Distribution of human papillomavirus types in ThinPrep Papanicolaou tests classified according to the Bethesda 2001 terminology and correlations with patient age and biopsy outcomes.
Evans MF; Adamson CS; Papillo JL; St John TL; Leiman G; Cooper K
Cancer; 2006 Mar; 106(5):1054-64. PubMed ID: 16421920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Expression of MN/CA9 protein in Papanicolaou smears containing atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance is a diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia and neoplasia.
Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ
Cancer; 2000 Mar; 88(5):1108-21. PubMed ID: 10699902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do qualifiers of ASCUS distinguish between low- and high-risk patients?
Malik SN; Wilkinson EJ; Drew PA; Bennett BB; Hardt NS
Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(3):376-80. PubMed ID: 10349365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic and prognostic significance of image cytometric DNA ploidy measurement in cytological samples of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Demirel D; Akyürek N; Ramzy I
Cytopathology; 2013 Apr; 24(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 23331643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Expression of p16 INK4A in Papanicolaou smears containing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance from the uterine cervix.
Nieh S; Chen SF; Chu TY; Lai HC; Fu E
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Oct; 91(1):201-8. PubMed ID: 14529682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Role of Pap Test terminology and age in the detection of carcinoma invasive and carcinoma in situ in medically underserved California women.
Howell LP; Tabnak F; Tudury AJ; Stoodt G
Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Apr; 30(4):227-34. PubMed ID: 15048955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prognostic significance of DNA cytometry of postirradiation cervicovaginal smears.
Davey DD; Zaleski S; Sattich M; Gallion H
Cancer; 1998 Feb; 84(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 9500647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The significance of the Papanicolaou smear diagnosis of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Nasser SM; Cibas ES; Crum CP; Faquin WC
Cancer; 2003 Oct; 99(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 14579293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The significance of "low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion" as a distinct squamous abnormality category in Papanicolaou tests.
Elsheikh TM; Kirkpatrick JL; Wu HH
Cancer; 2006 Oct; 108(5):277-81. PubMed ID: 16937376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The clinical significance of "squamous intraepithelial lesion of indeterminate grade" as a distinct cytologic category.
Wong D; Teschendorf C; Lin GY; Hasteh F
Am J Clin Pathol; 2012 May; 137(5):753-60. PubMed ID: 22523214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic value of endocervical curettage for detecting dysplastic lesions in women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) Papanicolaou smears.
Poomtavorn Y; Suwannarurk K; Thaweekul Y; Maireang K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(8):3461-4. PubMed ID: 24870740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Liquid-based cytology--new possibilities in the diagnosis of cervical lesions.
Juric D; Mahovlić V; Rajhvajn S; Ovanin-Rakić A; Skopljanac-Macina L; Barisić A; Projić IS; Babić D; Susa M; Corusić A; Oresković S
Coll Antropol; 2010 Mar; 34(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 20432728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Virologic versus cytologic triage of women with equivocal Pap smears: a meta-analysis of the accuracy to detect high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia.
Arbyn M; Buntinx F; Van Ranst M; Paraskevaidis E; Martin-Hirsch P; Dillner J
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Feb; 96(4):280-93. PubMed ID: 14970277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot rule out high-grade lesion: Diagnosis, histological outcomes and human papillomavirus results.
Segura SE; Ramos-Rivera G; Hakima L; Suhrland M; Khader S
Cytopathology; 2019 Jan; 30(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 30187975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Results of pap smears and immunocytochemical detection of the p16 and Ki67 proteins in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer].
Rokita W; Skawiński D; Zmelonek-Znamirowska A; Kedzia W; Karowicz-Bilińska A; Spaczyński R; Spaczyński M
Ginekol Pol; 2012 Nov; 83(11):822-6. PubMed ID: 23379189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervicography combined with repeat Papanicolaou test as triage for low-grade cytologic abnormalities.
Eskridge C; Begneaud WP; Landwehr C
Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Sep; 92(3):351-5. PubMed ID: 9721768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality metrics in cervical cytopathology: A single institutional study.
Senthil Kumar D; Ravikumar G
Cytopathology; 2022 Mar; 33(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 34854153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in liquid-based cytologic specimens: results of reflex human papillomavirus testing and histologic follow-up in routine practice with comparison of interpretive and probabilistic reporting methods.
Levi AW; Kelly DP; Rosenthal DL; Ronnett BM
Cancer; 2003 Aug; 99(4):191-7. PubMed ID: 12925979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS), low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and histology.
Rossetti D; Gerli S; Saab JC; Di Renzo GC
J Med Liban; 2000; 48(3):127-30. PubMed ID: 11268564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
