These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11392291)

  • 1. Artifacts in musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging: identification and correction.
    Peh WC; Chan JH
    Skeletal Radiol; 2001 Apr; 30(4):179-91. PubMed ID: 11392291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Artifacts in musculoskeletal MR imaging.
    Singh DR; Chin MS; Peh WC
    Semin Musculoskelet Radiol; 2014 Feb; 18(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 24515878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pitfalls and artifacts encountered in clinical MR imaging of the spine.
    Taber KH; Herrick RC; Weathers SW; Kumar AJ; Schomer DF; Hayman LA
    Radiographics; 1998; 18(6):1499-521. PubMed ID: 9821197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MR imaging artifacts that simulate disease: how to recognize and eliminate them.
    Arena L; Morehouse HT; Safir J
    Radiographics; 1995 Nov; 15(6):1373-94. PubMed ID: 8577963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The magic angle effect in musculoskeletal MR imaging.
    Hayes CW; Parellada JA
    Top Magn Reson Imaging; 1996 Feb; 8(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 8820094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Artifacts and pitfalls in MR imaging of the orbit: a clinical review.
    Herrick RC; Hayman LA; Taber KH; Diaz-Marchan PJ; Kuo MD
    Radiographics; 1997; 17(3):707-24. PubMed ID: 9153707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Musculoskeletal MR imaging: turbo (fast) spin-echo versus conventional spin-echo and gradient-echo imaging at 0.5 tesla.
    Vahlensieck M; Lang P; Seelos K; Yang-Ho Sze D; Grampp S; Reiser M
    Skeletal Radiol; 1994 Nov; 23(8):607-10. PubMed ID: 7886469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Body MR Imaging: Artifacts, k-Space, and Solutions.
    Huang SY; Seethamraju RT; Patel P; Hahn PF; Kirsch JE; Guimaraes AR
    Radiographics; 2015; 35(5):1439-60. PubMed ID: 26207581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recognizing and interpreting artifacts and pitfalls in MR imaging of the breast.
    Ojeda-Fournier H; Choe KA; Mahoney MC
    Radiographics; 2007 Oct; 27 Suppl 1():S147-64. PubMed ID: 18180224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimizing abdominal MR imaging: approaches to common problems.
    Yang RK; Roth CG; Ward RJ; deJesus JO; Mitchell DG
    Radiographics; 2010 Jan; 30(1):185-99. PubMed ID: 20083593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Chemical Shift MR Imaging of the Adrenal Gland: Principles, Pitfalls, and Applications.
    Adam SZ; Nikolaidis P; Horowitz JM; Gabriel H; Hammond NA; Patel T; Yaghmai V; Miller FH
    Radiographics; 2016; 36(2):414-32. PubMed ID: 26849154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Physical principles of magnetic resonance imaging.
    Seeger LL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 Jul; (244):7-16. PubMed ID: 2663291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Feasibility of fat-saturated T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with slice encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC) at 3T.
    Lee YH; Lim D; Kim E; Kim S; Song HT; Suh JS
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Oct; 32(8):1001-5. PubMed ID: 24925839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Breast MR imaging artifacts: how to recognize and fix them.
    Harvey JA; Hendrick RE; Coll JM; Nicholson BT; Burkholder BT; Cohen MA
    Radiographics; 2007 Oct; 27 Suppl 1():S131-45. PubMed ID: 18180223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 3.0 Tesla imaging of the musculoskeletal system.
    Kuo R; Panchal M; Tanenbaum L; Crues JV
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Feb; 25(2):245-61. PubMed ID: 17260407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Observation and correction of transient cavitation-induced PRFS thermometry artifacts during radiofrequency ablation, using simultaneous ultrasound/MR imaging.
    Viallon M; Terraz S; Roland J; Dumont E; Becker CD; Salomir R
    Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1491-506. PubMed ID: 20443470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Water excitation as an alternative to fat saturation in MR imaging: preliminary results in musculoskeletal imaging.
    Hauger O; Dumont E; Chateil JF; Moinard M; Diard F
    Radiology; 2002 Sep; 224(3):657-63. PubMed ID: 12202695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Motion artifact control in body MR imaging.
    Barish MA; Jara H
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1999 May; 7(2):289-301. PubMed ID: 10382162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MR Imaging with Metal-suppression Sequences for Evaluation of Total Joint Arthroplasty.
    Talbot BS; Weinberg EP
    Radiographics; 2016; 36(1):209-25. PubMed ID: 26587889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Selective in vivo bone imaging with long-T
    Li C; Magland JF; Zhao X; Seifert AC; Wehrli FW
    Magn Reson Med; 2017 Mar; 77(3):989-997. PubMed ID: 26914767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.