209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11392438)
1. Listeners who prefer monaural to binaural hearing aids.
Carter AS; Noe CM; Wilson RH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 May; 12(5):261-72. PubMed ID: 11392438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficacy of the cued-listening task in the evaluation of binaural hearing aids.
Jerger J; Darling R; Florin E
J Am Acad Audiol; 1994 Sep; 5(5):279-85. PubMed ID: 7987016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Are two ears not better than one?
McArdle RA; Killion M; Mennite MA; Chisolm TH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Mar; 23(3):171-81. PubMed ID: 22436115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of head angle on monaural and binaural performance with directional and omnidirectional hearing aids.
Ricketts T
Ear Hear; 2000 Aug; 21(4):318-28. PubMed ID: 10981608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Binaural application of the bone-anchored hearing aid.
Snik AF; Beynon AJ; Mylanus EA; van der Pouw CT; Cremers CW
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1998 Mar; 107(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 9525238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Successful and unsuccessful users of bilateral amplification: differences and similarities in binaural performance.
Köbler S; Lindblad AC; Olofsson A; Hagerman B
Int J Audiol; 2010 Sep; 49(9):613-27. PubMed ID: 20707668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term effects of monaural, binaural and no amplification in subjects with bilateral hearing loss.
Gelfand SA; Silman S; Ross L
Scand Audiol; 1987; 16(4):201-7. PubMed ID: 3438702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Behavioral and electrophysiologic binaural processing in persons with symmetric hearing loss.
Leigh-Paffenroth ED; Roup CM; Noe CM
J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Mar; 22(3):181-93; quiz 194-5. PubMed ID: 21545770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of asymmetrical signal degradation on binaural speech recognition in children and adults.
Rothpletz AM; Tharpe AM; Grantham DW
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):269-80. PubMed ID: 15157129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Binaural processing and phonological awareness in Australian Indigenous children from the Northern Territory: A community based study.
Sharma M; Wigglesworth G; Savage G; Demuth K
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Jan; 128():109702. PubMed ID: 31606681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nonsense-syllable recognition in noise using monaural and binaural listening strategies.
Arsenault MD; Punch JL
J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Mar; 105(3):1821-30. PubMed ID: 10089605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Binaural dichotic presentation to reduce the effects of spectral masking in moderate bilateral sensorineural hearing loss.
Kulkarni PN; Pandey PC; Jangamashetti DS
Int J Audiol; 2012 Apr; 51(4):334-44. PubMed ID: 22201526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of three strategies for fitting hearing aids binaurally.
Punch JL; Jenison RL; Allan J; Durrant JD
Ear Hear; 1991 Jun; 12(3):205-15. PubMed ID: 1916046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of noise and reverberation on binaural and monaural word identification by subjects with various audiograms.
Nabelek AK; Mason D
J Speech Hear Res; 1981 Sep; 24(3):375-83. PubMed ID: 7300279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Late-onset auditory deprivation: effects of monaural versus binaural hearing aids.
Silman S; Gelfand SA; Silverman CA
J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Nov; 76(5):1357-62. PubMed ID: 6512097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Apparent auditory deprivation in children: implications of monaural versus binaural amplification.
Gelfand SA; Silman S
J Am Acad Audiol; 1993 Sep; 4(5):313-8. PubMed ID: 8219298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of amplification on the discrimination of dichotic consonant-vowel syllables in a population with sensorineural hearing loss.
Jacobson JT; McCandless GA; Mahoney TM
Audiology; 1979; 18(6):522-36. PubMed ID: 526197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The benefits of bilateral versus unilateral amplification for the elderly: are two always better than one?
Henkin Y; Waldman A; Kishon-Rabin L
J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol; 2007; 18(3):201-16. PubMed ID: 17970568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ear dominance for nonsense-syllable recognition ability in sensorineural hearing-impaired children: monaural versus binaural amplification.
Hattori H
J Am Acad Audiol; 1993 Sep; 4(5):319-30. PubMed ID: 8219299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
