These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11392659)

  • 1. A three-microphone system for real-time directional analysis: toward a device for environmental monitoring in deaf-blind.
    Borg E; Neovius L; Kjellander M
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2001; 38(2):265-72. PubMed ID: 11392659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vibratory-coded directional analysis: evaluation of a three-microphone/four-vibrator DSP system.
    Borg E; Rönnberg J; Neovius L
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2001; 38(2):257-63. PubMed ID: 11392658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification.
    Lin LM; Bowditch S; Anderson MJ; May B; Cox KM; Niparko JK
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 16436986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
    Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A localization algorithm based on head-related transfer functions.
    Macdonald JA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4290-6. PubMed ID: 18537380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the benefit for cochlear implantees of two assistive directional microphone systems in an artificial diffuse noise situation.
    van der Beek FB; Soede W; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):99-110. PubMed ID: 17204902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using hearing aid adaptive directional microphones to enhance cochlear implant performance.
    Chung K; Zeng FG
    Hear Res; 2009 Apr; 250(1-2):27-37. PubMed ID: 19450437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Labadie RF; Haynes DS
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech understanding in background noise with the two-microphone adaptive beamformer BEAM in the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear Implant System.
    Spriet A; Van Deun L; Eftaxiadis K; Laneau J; Moonen M; van Dijk B; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 17204899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of multimicrophone noise reduction systems on sound source localization by users of binaural hearing aids.
    Van den Bogaert T; Doclo S; Wouters J; Moonen M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jul; 124(1):484-97. PubMed ID: 18646992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
    James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of noise source configuration on directional benefit using symmetric and asymmetric directional hearing aid fittings.
    Hornsby BW; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 17496669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Audiometric evaluation of bilaterally fitted bone-anchored hearing aids.
    Bosman AJ; Snik AF; van der Pouw CT; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Audiology; 2001; 40(3):158-67. PubMed ID: 11465298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of in-the-ear microphone directionality on sound direction identification.
    Chung K; Neuman AC; Higgins M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Apr; 123(4):2264-75. PubMed ID: 18397031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of multi-channel wide dynamic range compression, noise reduction, and the directional microphone on horizontal localization performance in hearing aid wearers.
    Keidser G; Rohrseitz K; Dillon H; Hamacher V; Carter L; Rass U; Convery E
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Oct; 45(10):563-79. PubMed ID: 17062498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Monitoring the environment: sound localization equipment for deaf-blind people.
    Borg E; Rönnberg J; Neovius L; Kjellander M
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1999 Mar; 119(2):146-9. PubMed ID: 10320064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictive measures of directional benefit part 2: verification of different approaches to estimating directional benefit.
    Dittberner AB; Bentler RA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):46-61. PubMed ID: 17204898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Distance and reverberation effects on directional benefit.
    Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):472-84. PubMed ID: 14663347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.