These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11393903)

  • 1. Using Johnson's transformation and robust estimators with heteroscedastic test statistics: an examination of the effects of non-normality and heterogeneity in the non-orthogonal two-way ANOVA design.
    Luh WM; Guo JH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2001 May; 54(Pt 1):79-94. PubMed ID: 11393903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transformation works for non-normality? On one-sample transformation trimmed t methods.
    Luh WM; Guo JH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2001 Nov; 54(Pt 2):227-36. PubMed ID: 11817091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of non-normality on test statistics for one-way independent groups designs.
    Cribbie RA; Fiksenbaum L; Keselman HJ; Wilcox RR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 Feb; 65(1):56-73. PubMed ID: 21426313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A robust approach for analyzing unbalanced factorial designs with fixed levels.
    Vallejo G; Ato M; Fernández MP
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 May; 42(2):607-17. PubMed ID: 20479192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of sample non-normality on ANOVA and alternative methods.
    Lantz B
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 May; 66(2):224-44. PubMed ID: 22624658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Heterogeneity estimation in meta-analysis of standardized mean differences when the distribution of random effects departs from normal: A Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Blázquez-Rincón D; Sánchez-Meca J; Botella J; Suero M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Jan; 23(1):19. PubMed ID: 36650428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Empirical Likelihood-Based ANOVA for Trimmed Means.
    Velina M; Valeinis J; Greco L; Luta G
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2016 Sep; 13(10):. PubMed ID: 27690063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical estimation of fetal weight in low resource settings: comparison of Johnson's formula and the palpation method.
    Belete W; Gaym A
    Ethiop Med J; 2008 Jan; 46(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 18711988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating clinical significance: incorporating robust statistics with normative comparison tests.
    van Wieringen K; Cribbie RA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 May; 67(2):213-30. PubMed ID: 23751017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sample size determinations for Welch's test in one-way heteroscedastic ANOVA.
    Jan SL; Shieh G
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 Feb; 67(1):72-93. PubMed ID: 23316952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Non-normal data: Is ANOVA still a valid option?
    Blanca MJ; Alarcón R; Arnau J; Bono R; Bendayan R
    Psicothema; 2017 Nov; 29(4):552-557. PubMed ID: 29048317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Monte Carlo generation of SB and SU distributions.
    Reed JF; Stark DB
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1995 Jul; 47(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 7587162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. New heterogeneous test statistics for the unbalanced fixed-effect nested design.
    Guo JH; Billard L; Luh WM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 May; 64(Pt 2):259-76. PubMed ID: 21492132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tests that are robust against variance heterogeneity in k x 2 designs with unequal cell frequencies.
    Overall JE; Atlas RS; Gibson JM
    Psychol Rep; 1995 Jun; 76(3 Pt 1):1011-7. PubMed ID: 7568575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robust tests for the multivariate Behrens-Fisher problem.
    Lix LM; Keselman HJ; Hinds AM
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2005 Feb; 77(2):129-39. PubMed ID: 15652635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Monte Carlo evaluation of three statistical methods used in path analysis.
    McGue M; Wette R; Rao DC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1987; 4(2):129-55. PubMed ID: 3582958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Power of a test that is robust against variance heterogeneity.
    Overall JE; Atlas RS; Gibson JM
    Psychol Rep; 1995 Aug; 77(1):155-9. PubMed ID: 7501755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing meta-regression methods for examining moderator relationships with dependent effect sizes: A Monte Carlo simulation.
    López-López JA; Van den Noortgate W; Tanner-Smith EE; Wilson SJ; Lipsey MW
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Dec; 8(4):435-450. PubMed ID: 28556477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Non-iterative robust estimators of variance components in within-subject designs.
    Mehrotra DV
    Stat Med; 1997 Jul; 16(13):1465-79. PubMed ID: 9249919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Testing treatment effects in repeated measures designs: trimmed means and bootstrapping.
    Keselman HJ; Kowalchuk RK; Algina J; Lix LM; Wilcox RR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2000 Nov; 53 ( Pt 2)():175-91. PubMed ID: 11109703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.