110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11393990)
1. Comparison of two floor mat lead dust collection methods and their application in pre-1950 and new urban houses.
Farfel MR; Orlova AO; Lees PS; Bowen C; Elias R; Ashley PJ; Chisolm JJ
Environ Sci Technol; 2001 May; 35(10):2078-83. PubMed ID: 11393990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of pesticides and other compounds in carpet dust samples collected from used vacuum cleaner bags and from a high-volume surface sampler.
Colt JS
Environ Health Perspect; 1998 Nov; 106(11):721-4. PubMed ID: 9799187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A side-by-side comparison of dust collection methods for sampling lead-contaminated house dust.
Lanphear BP; Emond M; Jacobs DE; Weitzman M; Tanner M; Winter NL; Yakir B; Eberly S
Environ Res; 1995 Feb; 68(2):114-23. PubMed ID: 7601072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A study of urban housing demolitions as sources of lead in ambient dust: demolition practices and exterior dust fall.
Farfel MR; Orlova AO; Lees PS; Rohde C; Ashley PJ; Chisolm JJ
Environ Health Perspect; 2003 Jul; 111(9):1228-34. PubMed ID: 12842778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. House dust collection efficiency of the high volume small surface sampler on worn carpets.
Svendsen E; Thorne P; O'Shaughnessy P; Zimmerman D; Reynolds S
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Jun; 3(6):334-341. PubMed ID: 16718951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Exposures to lead-based paint dust in an inner-city high school.
Decker JA; Malkin R; Kiefer M
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1999; 60(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 10222569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficiency of final cleaning for lead-based paint abatement in indoor environments.
Grinshpun SA; Choe KT; Trunov M; Willeke K; Menrath W; Friedman W
Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2002 Mar; 17(3):222-34. PubMed ID: 11871758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of a wipe and a vacuum collection method for the determination of lead in residential dusts.
Farfel MR; Lees PS; Rohde CA; Lim BS; Bannon D; Chisolm JJ
Environ Res; 1994 May; 65(2):291-301. PubMed ID: 8187743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Initial results for urban metal distributions in house dusts of Syracuse, New York, USA.
Johnson DL; Hager J; Hunt A; Griffith DA; Blount S; Ellsworth S; Hintz J; Lucci R; Mittiga A; Prokhorova D; Tidd L; Millones MM; Vincent M
Sci China C Life Sci; 2005 May; 48 Suppl 1():92-9. PubMed ID: 16089334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Household vacuum cleaners vs. the high-volume surface sampler for collection of carpet dust samples in epidemiologic studies of children.
Colt JS; Gunier RB; Metayer C; Nishioka MG; Bell EM; Reynolds P; Buffler PA; Ward MH
Environ Health; 2008 Feb; 7():6. PubMed ID: 18291036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of four sampling methods for determining exposure of children to lead-contaminated household dust.
Sterling DA; Roegner KC; Lewis RD; Luke DA; Wilder LC; Burchette SM
Environ Res; 1999 Aug; 81(2):130-41. PubMed ID: 10433844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of soil remediation on lead in house dust.
von Lindern IH; Spalinger SM; Bero BN; Petrosyan V; von Braun MC
Sci Total Environ; 2003 Feb; 303(1-2):59-78. PubMed ID: 12568765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Field evaluation and comparison of five methods of sampling lead dust on carpets.
Bai Z; Yiin LM; Rich DQ; Adgate JL; Ashley PJ; Lioy PJ; Rhoads GG; Zhang J
AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2003; 64(4):528-32. PubMed ID: 12908870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A field comparison of two methods for sampling lead in household dust.
Rich DQ; Yiin LM; Rhoads GG; Glueck DH; Weisel C; Lioy PJ
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1999; 9(2):106-12. PubMed ID: 10321350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of techniques to reduce residential lead dust on carpet and upholstery: the new jersey assessment of cleaning techniques trial.
Yiin LM; Rhoads GG; Rich DQ; Zhang J; Bai Z; Adgate JL; Ashley PJ; Lioy PJ
Environ Health Perspect; 2002 Dec; 110(12):1233-7. PubMed ID: 12460803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Immediate and one-year post-intervention effectiveness of Maryland's lead law treatments.
Breysse J; Anderson J; Dixon S; Galke W; Wilson J
Environ Res; 2007 Oct; 105(2):267-75. PubMed ID: 17559831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Indoor dust and air concentrations of endotoxin in urban and rural environments.
Barnig C; Reboux G; Roussel S; Casset A; Sohy C; Dalphin JC; de Blay F
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2013 Mar; 56(3):161-7. PubMed ID: 23121051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A side-by-side comparison of sampling methods for settled, indoor allergens.
Mansour M; Lanphear BP; Hornung R; Khoury J; Bernstein DI; Menrath W; Decolongon J
Environ Res; 2001 Sep; 87(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 11534963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Residential dust lead loading immediately after intervention in the HUD lead hazard control grant program.
Dixon SL; Wilson JW; Succop PA; Chen M; Galke WA; Menrath W; Clark CS
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Nov; 1(11):716-24. PubMed ID: 15673092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A coordinated relocation strategy for enhancing case management of lead poisoned children: outcomes and costs.
McLaine P; Shields W; Farfel M; Chisolm JJ; Dixon S
J Urban Health; 2006 Jan; 83(1):111-28. PubMed ID: 16736359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
