290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11394537)
1. Digital mammography: observer performance study of the effects of pixel size on the characterization of malignant and benign microcalcifications.
Chan HP; Helvie MA; Petrick N; Sahiner B; Adler DD; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA; Blane CE; Joynt LK; Wilson TE; Hadjiiski LM; Goodsitt MM
Acad Radiol; 2001 Jun; 8(6):454-66. PubMed ID: 11394537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. New CR system with pixel size of 50 microm for digital mammography: physical imaging properties and detection of subtle microcalcifications.
Ideguchi T; Higashida Y; Kawaji Y; Sasaki M; Zaizen M; Shibayama R; Nakamura Y; Koyanagi K; Ikeda H; Ohki M; Toyofuku F; Muranaka T
Radiat Med; 2004; 22(4):218-24. PubMed ID: 15468941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computerized analysis of mammographic microcalcifications in morphological and texture feature spaces.
Chan HP; Sahiner B; Lam KL; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Goodsitt MM; Adler DD
Med Phys; 1998 Oct; 25(10):2007-19. PubMed ID: 9800710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spatial resolution in digital mammography.
Karssemeijer N; Frieling JT; Hendriks JH
Invest Radiol; 1993 May; 28(5):413-9. PubMed ID: 8496034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detecting clustered microcalcifications in the female breast: secondary digitized images versus mammograms.
De Maeseneer M; Beeckman P; Osteaux M; Mattheus R; Hoste M; Bastaerts Y; Jong B
J Belge Radiol; 1992 Jun; 75(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 1400145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
Shaheen E; Van Ongeval C; Zanca F; Cockmartin L; Marshall N; Jacobs J; Young KC; R Dance D; Bosmans H
Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6659-71. PubMed ID: 22149848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Segmentation and numerical analysis of microcalcifications on mammograms using mathematical morphology.
Betal D; Roberts N; Whitehouse GH
Br J Radiol; 1997 Sep; 70(837):903-17. PubMed ID: 9486066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast masses: computer-aided diagnosis with serial mammograms.
Hadjiiski L; Sahiner B; Helvie MA; Chan HP; Roubidoux MA; Paramagul C; Blane C; Petrick N; Bailey J; Klein K; Foster M; Patterson SK; Adler D; Nees AV; Shen J
Radiology; 2006 Aug; 240(2):343-56. PubMed ID: 16801362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Application of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system to digitalized mammograms for identifying microcalcifications].
Bazzocchi M; Facecchia I; Zuiani C; Londero V; Smania S; Bottigli U; Delogu P
Radiol Med; 2001 May; 101(5):334-40. PubMed ID: 11438784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digitization requirements in mammography: effects on computer-aided detection of microcalcifications.
Chan HP; Niklason LT; Ikeda DM; Lam KL; Adler DD
Med Phys; 1994 Jul; 21(7):1203-11. PubMed ID: 7968855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Real and simulated clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms. ROC study of observer performance.
Lado MJ; Tahoces PG; Souto M; Méndez AJ; Vidal JJ
Med Phys; 1997 Sep; 24(9):1385-94. PubMed ID: 9304566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimizing parameters for computer-aided diagnosis of microcalcifications at mammography.
Leichter I; Lederman R; Buchbinder S; Bamberger P; Novak B; Fields S
Acad Radiol; 2000 Jun; 7(6):406-12. PubMed ID: 10845399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparing the clinical value of spot view mammography with reduced pixel size to monitor zooming by reporting microcalcifications in digital mammography].
Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Wenkel E; Adamietz B; Lell M; Böhner C; Uder M; Bautz WA
Rofo; 2007 May; 179(5):492-6. PubMed ID: 17436183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microcalcification detectability for four mammographic detectors: flat-panel, CCD, CR, and screen/film).
Rong XJ; Shaw CC; Johnston DA; Lemacks MR; Liu X; Whitman GJ; Dryden MJ; Stephens TW; Thompson SK; Krugh KT; Lai CJ
Med Phys; 2002 Sep; 29(9):2052-61. PubMed ID: 12349926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Digital mammography. ROC studies of the effects of pixel size and unsharp-mask filtering on the detection of subtle microcalcifications.
Chan HP; Vyborny CJ; MacMahon H; Metz CE; Doi K; Sickles EA
Invest Radiol; 1987 Jul; 22(7):581-9. PubMed ID: 3623862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantification of Al-equivalent thickness of just visible microcalcifications in full field digital mammograms.
Carton AK; Bosmans H; Vandenbroucke D; Souverijns G; Van Ongeval C; Dragusin O; Marchal G
Med Phys; 2004 Jul; 31(7):2165-76. PubMed ID: 15305471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Visualization of microcalcifications on mammographies obtained by digital full-field mammography in comparison to conventional film-screen mammography].
Diekmann S; Bick U; von Heyden H; Diekmann F
Rofo; 2003 Jun; 175(6):775-9. PubMed ID: 12811689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer-aided preoperative diagnosis of microcalcifications on mammograms.
Kouskos E; Markopoulos C; Revenas K; Koufopoulos K; Kyriakou V; Gogas J
Acta Radiol; 2003 Jan; 44(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 12630997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The use of an interactive software program for quantitative characterization of microcalcifications on digitized film-screen mammograms.
Leichter I; Lederman R; Bamberger P; Novak B; Fields S; Buchbinder SS
Invest Radiol; 1999 Jun; 34(6):394-400. PubMed ID: 10353031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
