These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11394671)

  • 1. On attentional control as a source of residual shift costs: evidence from two-component task shifts.
    Hübner R; Futterer T; Steinhauser M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 May; 27(3):640-53. PubMed ID: 11394671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Response-based strengthening in task shifting: evidence from shift effects produced by errors.
    Steinhauser M; Hübner R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Jun; 32(3):517-34. PubMed ID: 16822122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Response activation in overlapping tasks and the response-selection bottleneck.
    Schubert T; Fischer R; Stelzel C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):376-97. PubMed ID: 18377177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Operation compatibility: a neglected contribution to dual-task costs.
    Pannebakker MM; Band GP; Ridderinkhof KR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Apr; 35(2):447-60. PubMed ID: 19331500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Linguistic attention control: attention shifting governed by grammaticized elements of language.
    Taube-Schiff M; Segalowitz N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 May; 31(3):508-19. PubMed ID: 15910134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The source of execution-related dual-task interference: motor bottleneck or response monitoring?
    Bratzke D; Rolke B; Ulrich R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1413-26. PubMed ID: 19803646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of attentional processes in ADHD and normal children.
    Gupta R; Kar BR
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():259-76. PubMed ID: 19733762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inhibition and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults.
    Ossmann JM; Mulligan NW
    Am J Psychol; 2003; 116(1):35-50. PubMed ID: 12710221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Precueing spatial S-R correspondence: is there regulation of expected response conflict?
    Wühr P; Kunde W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):872-83. PubMed ID: 18665732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Response selection difficulty and asymmetrical costs of switching between tasks and stimuli: no evidence for an exogenous component of task-set reconfiguration.
    Hübner M; Kluwe RH; Luna-Rodriguez A; Peters A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Dec; 30(6):1043-63. PubMed ID: 15584814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Response selection and response execution in task switching: evidence from a go-signal paradigm.
    Philipp AM; Jolicoeur P; Falkenstein M; Koch I
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):1062-75. PubMed ID: 17983313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transfer of learning in choice reactions: contributions of specific and general components of manual responses.
    Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jan; 130(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 18952202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adaptive control of response preparedness in task switching.
    Steinhauser M; Hübner R; Druey M
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jul; 47(8-9):1826-35. PubMed ID: 19428414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fractionating the neural mechanisms of cognitive control.
    Kopp B; Tabeling S; Moschner C; Wessel K
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Jun; 18(6):949-65. PubMed ID: 16839302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dual-task performance with ideomotor-compatible tasks: is the central processing bottleneck intact, bypassed, or shifted in locus?
    Lien MC; McCann RS; Ruthruff E; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Feb; 31(1):122-44. PubMed ID: 15709868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A dissociation in attentional control: evidence from methamphetamine dependence.
    Salo R; Nordahl TE; Moore C; Waters C; Natsuaki Y; Galloway GP; Kile S; Sullivan EV
    Biol Psychiatry; 2005 Feb; 57(3):310-3. PubMed ID: 15691533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can practice overcome age-related differences in the psychological refractory period effect?
    Maquestiaux F; Hartley AA; Bertsch J
    Psychol Aging; 2004 Dec; 19(4):649-67. PubMed ID: 15584790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Parallel response selection after callosotomy.
    Hazeltine E; Weinstein A; Ivry RB
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Mar; 20(3):526-40. PubMed ID: 18004953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The psychological refractory period of stopping.
    Horstmann G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):965-81. PubMed ID: 14585017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fractionating the cognitive control required to bring about a change in task: a dense-sensor event-related potential study.
    Astle DE; Jackson GM; Swainson R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 20(2):255-67. PubMed ID: 18275333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.