These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11394672)

  • 21. The effects of distractor sounds presented through bone conduction headphones on the localization of critical environmental sounds.
    May KR; Walker BN
    Appl Ergon; 2017 May; 61():144-158. PubMed ID: 28237013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. "RED" matters when naming "CAR": The cascading activation of nontarget properties.
    Roux S; Bonin P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Mar; 42(3):475-88. PubMed ID: 26389629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Distractibility and processing resource deficit in major depression. Evidence for two deficient attentional processing models.
    Lemelin S; Baruch P; Vincent A; Everett J; Vincent P
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 1997 Sep; 185(9):542-8. PubMed ID: 9307615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cross-modal perceptual load: the impact of modality and individual differences.
    Sandhu R; Dyson BJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 May; 234(5):1279-91. PubMed ID: 26670905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Multi-modal distraction: insights from children's limited attention.
    Matusz PJ; Broadbent H; Ferrari J; Forrest B; Merkley R; Scerif G
    Cognition; 2015 Mar; 136():156-65. PubMed ID: 25497524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Towards a cognitive model of distraction by auditory novelty: the role of involuntary attention capture and semantic processing.
    Parmentier FB
    Cognition; 2008 Dec; 109(3):345-62. PubMed ID: 19007926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Differences in the strength of distractor inhibition do not affect distractor-response bindings.
    Giesen C; Frings C; Rothermund K
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Apr; 40(3):373-87. PubMed ID: 22081277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Nonconcurrently presented auditory tones reduce distraction.
    Dittrich K; Stahl C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Apr; 73(3):714-9. PubMed ID: 21264700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A dual contribution to the involuntary semantic processing of unexpected spoken words.
    Parmentier FB; Turner J; Perez L
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Feb; 143(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 23339333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Isolation of specific interference processing in the Stroop task: PET activation studies.
    Taylor SF; Kornblum S; Lauber EJ; Minoshima S; Koeppe RA
    Neuroimage; 1997 Aug; 6(2):81-92. PubMed ID: 9299382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The cognitive locus of distraction by acoustic novelty in the cross-modal oddball task.
    Parmentier FB; Elford G; Escera C; Andrés P; San Miguel I
    Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):408-32. PubMed ID: 17445791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Disruption of short-term memory by changing and deviant sounds: support for a duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction.
    Hughes RW; Vachon F; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):1050-61. PubMed ID: 17983312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. N400 modulation by categorical or associative interference in a famous face naming task.
    Germain-Mondon V; Silvert L; Izaute M
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Sep; 501(3):188-92. PubMed ID: 21798317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Attentional capture by salient color singleton distractors is modulated by top-down dimensional set.
    Müller HJ; Geyer T; Zehetleitner M; Krummenacher J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Feb; 35(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 19170466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Selective attention and distractor frequency in naming performance: comment on Dhooge and Hartsuiker (2010).
    Roelofs A; Piai V; Schriefers H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):1032-8. PubMed ID: 21728468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Distraction by auditory novelty. The course and aftermath of novelty and semantic effects.
    Parmentier FB; Turner J; Elsley JV
    Exp Psychol; 2011; 58(2):92-101. PubMed ID: 20494860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Dynamic cognitive control of irrelevant sound: Increased task engagement attenuates semantic auditory distraction.
    Marsh JE; Sörqvist P; Hughes RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Oct; 41(5):1462-74. PubMed ID: 26191618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Visual selective attention among persons with schizophrenia: the distractor ratio effect.
    Elahipanah A; Christensen BK; Reingold EM
    Schizophr Res; 2008 Oct; 105(1-3):61-7. PubMed ID: 18579345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Likelihood of attending to the color word modulates Stroop interference.
    Cho YS; Choi JM; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Feb; 74(2):416-29. PubMed ID: 22147533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. How priming affects two speeded implicit tests of remembering: naming colors versus reading words.
    MacLeod CM
    Conscious Cogn; 1996; 5(1-2):73-90. PubMed ID: 8733924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.