These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11394680)

  • 1. Prototypes in category learning: the effects of category size, category structure, and stimulus complexity.
    Minda JP; Smith JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 May; 27(3):775-99. PubMed ID: 11394680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stages of abstraction and exemplar memorization in pigeon category learning.
    Cook RG; Smith JD
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Dec; 17(12):1059-67. PubMed ID: 17201788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exemplars, prototypes, and the flexibility of classification models.
    Olsson H; Wennerholm P; Lyxzèn U
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Jul; 30(4):936-41. PubMed ID: 15238035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Central tendencies, extreme points, and prototype enhancement effects in ill-defined perceptual categorization.
    Palmeri TJ; Nosofsky RM
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Feb; 54(1):197-235. PubMed ID: 11216316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distinguishing prototype-based and exemplar-based processes in dot-pattern category learning.
    Smith JD; Minda JP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):800-11. PubMed ID: 12109770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Category representation for classification and feature inference.
    Johansen MK; Kruschke JK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Nov; 31(6):1433-58. PubMed ID: 16393056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conceptual complexity and the bias/variance tradeoff.
    Briscoe E; Feldman J
    Cognition; 2011 Jan; 118(1):2-16. PubMed ID: 21112048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Abstraction and model evaluation in category learning.
    Vanpaemel W; Storms G
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 May; 42(2):421-37. PubMed ID: 20479173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prototype and exemplar accounts of category learning and attentional allocation: a reassessment.
    Zaki SR; Nosofsky RM; Stanton RD; Cohen AL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1160-73. PubMed ID: 14622053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cue abstraction and exemplar memory in categorization.
    Juslin P; Jones S; Olsson H; Winman A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):924-41. PubMed ID: 14516225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What's behind different kinds of kinds: effects of statistical density on learning and representation of categories.
    Kloos H; Sloutsky VM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Feb; 137(1):52-72. PubMed ID: 18248129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Overconfidence effects in category learning: a comparison of connectionist and exemplar memory models.
    Sieck WR; Yates JF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Jul; 27(4):1003-21. PubMed ID: 11486916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The modulating influence of category size on the classification of exception patterns.
    Homa D; Proulx MJ; Blair M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Mar; 61(3):425-43. PubMed ID: 17853225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prototype abstraction by monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
    Smith JD; Redford JS; Haas SM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 May; 137(2):390-401. PubMed ID: 18473665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Developmental differences in the use of prototype and exemplar-specific information.
    Hayes BK; Taplin JE
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1993 Jun; 55(3):329-52. PubMed ID: 8315374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What does it look like and what can it do? Category structure influences how infants categorize.
    Horst JS; Oakes LM; Madole KL
    Child Dev; 2005; 76(3):614-31. PubMed ID: 15892782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exemplar and prototype models revisited: response strategies, selective attention, and stimulus generalization.
    Nosofsky RM; Zaki SR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Sep; 28(5):924-40. PubMed ID: 12219799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing prototype-based and exemplar-based accounts of category learning and attentional allocation.
    Minda JP; Smith JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Mar; 28(2):275-92. PubMed ID: 11911384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Learning rule-described and non-rule-described categories: a comparison of children and adults.
    Minda JP; Desroches AS; Church BA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1518-33. PubMed ID: 18980411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Thirty-something categorization results explained: selective attention, eyetracking, and models of category learning.
    Rehder B; Hoffman AB
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Sep; 31(5):811-29. PubMed ID: 16248736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.