346 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11395527)
1. Rapid palatal expansion in mixed dentition using a modified expander: a cephalometric investigation.
Cozza P; Giancotti A; Petrosino A
J Orthod; 2001 Jun; 28(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 11395527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rapid maxillary expansion in growing patients. Hyrax versus transverse sagittal maxillary expander: a cephalometric investigation.
Farronato G; Maspero C; Esposito L; Briguglio E; Farronato D; Giannini L
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 21059876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving Class II malocclusion as a side-effect of rapid maxillary expansion: a prospective clinical study.
Guest SS; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):582-91. PubMed ID: 21055598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of nitanium maxillary expander appliances on dentofacial structures.
Karaman AI
Angle Orthod; 2002 Aug; 72(4):344-54. PubMed ID: 12169035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dental and skeletal components of Class II open bite treatment with a modified Thurow appliance.
Jacob HB; dos Santos-Pinto A; Buschang PH
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 24713556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Skeletal alterations associated with the use of bonded rapid maxillary expansion appliance.
Rossi Md; Rossi Ad; Abrão J
Braz Dent J; 2011; 22(4):334-9. PubMed ID: 21861035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized clinical trial to assess the sagittal effects of Transforce transverse appliance (TTA) and NiTi palatal expander (NPE) on skeletal class II malocclusion in growing patients during retention phase - A cephalometric study using a historical control group.
Nagrik AP; Bhad WA; Chavan SJ; Doshi UH
Int Orthod; 2020 Dec; 18(4):722-731. PubMed ID: 33020047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An analysis of the corrective contribution in activator treatment.
Cozza P; De Toffol L; Iacopini L
Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):741-8. PubMed ID: 15673134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of maxillary protraction and its long-term stability--a clinical trial in Chinese adolescents.
Chen L; Chen R; Yang Y; Ji G; Shen G
Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 21325335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dentoskeletal effects of a removable appliance for expansion of the maxillary arch: a postero-anterior cephalometric study.
Defraia E; Marinelli A; Baroni G; Tollaro I
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 17971351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dento-skeletal effects of mixed palatal expansion evaluated by postero-anterior cephalometric analysis.
Grassia V; D'Apuzzo F; Ferrulli VE; Matarese G; Femiano F; Perillo L
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2014 Mar; 15(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 24745595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Skeletal and dental effects of a mini maxillary protraction appliance.
Altug Z; Arslan AD
Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):360-8. PubMed ID: 16637712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sagittal and vertical effects of transverse sagittal maxillary expander (TSME) in three different malocclusion groups.
Maspero C; Galbiati G; Giannini L; Farronato G
Prog Orthod; 2015 Apr; 16():6. PubMed ID: 25907431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An evaluation of the dentoskeletal effects of slow maxillary expansion from the mixed to the permanent dentition.
Esenlik E; Rübendüz M
Aust Orthod J; 2015 May; 31(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 26219141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of zigzag elastics in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion subjects with hypo- and hyperdivergent growth patterns. A pilot study.
Aras A; Cinsar A; Bulut H
Eur J Orthod; 2001 Aug; 23(4):393-402. PubMed ID: 11544789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study.
Sharma AK; Sachdev V; Singla A; Kirtaniya BC
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.
Martins RP; da Rosa Martins JC; Martins LP; Buschang PH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative evaluation of maxillary protraction with or without skeletal anchorage.
Sar C; Arman-Özçırpıcı A; Uçkan S; Yazıcı AC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 May; 139(5):636-49. PubMed ID: 21536207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of the sagittal and vertical dentofacial effects of maxillary expansion produced by a memory screw and a hyrax screw.
Halicioğlu K; Yavuz I
Aust Orthod J; 2016 May; 32(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 27468589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of rapid maxillary expansion in hyperdivergent patients.
Lineberger MW; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Herberger T; Franchi L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jul; 142(1):60-9. PubMed ID: 22748991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
