These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11395699)

  • 21. Class II correction with the modified sagittal appliance and maxillary second molar extraction.
    Aras A
    Angle Orthod; 2000 Aug; 70(4):332-8. PubMed ID: 10961784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effects of cervical headgear with an expanded inner bow in the permanent dentition.
    Varlik SK; Iscan HN
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Aug; 30(4):425-30. PubMed ID: 18678761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cervical headgear vs pendulum appliance for the treatment of moderate skeletal Class II malocclusion.
    Mossaz CF; Byloff FK; Kiliaridis S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):616-23. PubMed ID: 18005835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Short-term anteroposterior treatment effects of functional appliances and extraoral traction on class II malocclusion. A meta-analysis.
    Antonarakis GS; Kiliaridis S
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Sep; 77(5):907-14. PubMed ID: 17902235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of arch dimension changes in 1-phase vs 2-phase treatment of Class II malocclusion.
    Wortham JR; Dolce C; McGorray SP; Le H; King GJ; Wheeler TT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 19577150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion in adults: stepwise vs single-step advancement with the Herbst appliance.
    Purkayastha SK; Rabie AB; Wong R
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(3):233-43. PubMed ID: 18834006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effectiveness of twin blocks and extraoral maxillary splint (Thurow) appliances for the correction of Class II relationships.
    Fernandes ÁF; Brunharo IH; Quintão CC; Costa MG; de Oliveira-Costa MR
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(3):230-5. PubMed ID: 20877731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A modification of the twin block technique for patients with a deep bite.
    Mahony DR; Witzig J
    Funct Orthod; 1999; 16(2):4-8, 10. PubMed ID: 10613126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Control of vertical dimension in the treatment of Class II malocclusion using a combined activator and extraoral traction appliance].
    Chabre C
    Orthod Fr; 1989; 60 Pt 2():617-33. PubMed ID: 2490243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Class II correction in patients treated with class II elastics and with fixed functional appliances: a comparative study.
    Nelson B; Hansen K; Hägg U
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 10935954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of an anterior biteplate on dental and skeletal Class II correction using headgears: a cephalometric study.
    Thurman MM; King GJ; Ramsay DS; Wheeler TT; Phillips C
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2011 Nov; 14(4):213-21. PubMed ID: 22008301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Treatment effects of magnetic Twin-block appliance for class II cases].
    Wu JY; Liu J; Li QS; Xu TM; Lin JX
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Sep; 42(9):519-24. PubMed ID: 18070424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of Twin Block, Andresen and removable appliances in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Trenouth MJ
    Funct Orthod; 1992; 9(4):26-31. PubMed ID: 1452055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cephalometric evaluation of Class II malocclusion treatment with cervical headgear and mandibular fixed appliances.
    Freitas MR; Lima DV; Freitas KM; Janson G; Henriques JF
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Oct; 30(5):477-82. PubMed ID: 18725383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Midpalatal implants vs headgear for orthodontic anchorage--a randomized clinical trial: cephalometric results.
    Benson PE; Tinsley D; O'Dwyer JJ; Majumdar A; Doyle P; Sandler PJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):606-15. PubMed ID: 18005834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The modified twin block appliance in the treatment of Class II division 2 malocclusions.
    Dyer FM; McKeown HF; Sandler PJ
    J Orthod; 2001 Dec; 28(4):271-80. PubMed ID: 11709592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Initial and late treatment effects of headgear-Herbst appliance with mandibular step-by-step advancement.
    Hägg U; Du X; Rabie AB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):477-85. PubMed ID: 12439475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The headgear: an effective functional appliance adjunct to treatment of the common Class II malocclusion in the adolescent--a clinical perspective.
    DeAngelis V
    J Mass Dent Soc; 2009; 58(1):28-30. PubMed ID: 19526912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparision of Twin-block and Forsus (FRD) functional appliance--a cephalometric study.
    Mahamad IK; Neela PK; Mascarenhas R; Husain A
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2012; 23(3):49-58. PubMed ID: 23094559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Posttreatment changes after successful correction of Class II malocclusions with the twin block appliance.
    Mills CM; McCulloch KJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jul; 118(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 10893470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.