241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11396369)
1. Endometrial brush biopsy for the diagnosis of endometrial cancer.
Del Priore G; Williams R; Harbatkin CB; Wan LS; Mittal K; Yang GC
J Reprod Med; 2001 May; 46(5):439-43. PubMed ID: 11396369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Endometrial brush biopsy. An accurate outpatient method of detecting endometrial malignancy.
Wu HH; Casto BD; Elsheikh TM
J Reprod Med; 2003 Jan; 48(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 12611094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Endometrial biopsy using the Tao Brush method. A study of 50 women in a general gynecologic practice.
Yang GC; Wan LS
J Reprod Med; 2000 Feb; 45(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 10710740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Direct uterine sampling with the Tao brush sampler using a liquid-based preparation method for the detection of endometrial cancer and atypical hyperplasia: a feasibility study.
Kipp BR; Medeiros F; Campion MB; Distad TJ; Peterson LM; Keeney GL; Halling KC; Clayton AC
Cancer; 2008 Aug; 114(4):228-35. PubMed ID: 18548528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pipelle endometrial sampling in patients with known endometrial carcinoma.
Stovall TG; Photopulos GJ; Poston WM; Ling FW; Sandles LG
Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Jun; 77(6):954-6. PubMed ID: 2030877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pipelle endometrial sampling. Sensitivity in the detection of endometrial cancer.
Guido RS; Kanbour-Shakir A; Rulin MC; Christopherson WA
J Reprod Med; 1995 Aug; 40(8):553-5. PubMed ID: 7473450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors affecting adequacy of Pipelle and Tao Brush endometrial sampling.
Williams AR; Brechin S; Porter AJ; Warner P; Critchley HO
BJOG; 2008 Jul; 115(8):1028-36. PubMed ID: 18651884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Five-year follow-up of patients with recurrent postmenopausal bleeding.
Twu NF; Chen SS
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 2000 Aug; 63(8):628-33. PubMed ID: 10969449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of D&C and office endometrial biopsy in predicting final histopathologic grade in endometrial cancer.
Larson DM; Johnson KK; Broste SK; Krawisz BR; Kresl JJ
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jul; 86(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 7784020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Thin-layer cytology and histopathology in the evaluation of abnormal uterine bleeding.
Garcia F; Barker B; Davis J; Shelton T; Harrigill K; Schalk N; Meyer J; Hatch K
J Reprod Med; 2003 Nov; 48(11):882-8. PubMed ID: 14686021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the success of histopathological diagnosis with dilatation-curettage and Pipelle endometrial sampling.
Kazandi M; Okmen F; Ergenoglu AM; Yeniel AO; Zeybek B; Zekioglu O; Ozdemir N
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2012 Nov; 32(8):790-4. PubMed ID: 23075358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors influencing the detection of uterine cancer by suction curettage and endometrial brushing.
Yang GC; Wan LS; Del Priore G
J Reprod Med; 2002 Dec; 47(12):1005-10. PubMed ID: 12516318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pipelle versus fractional curettage for the endometrial sampling in postmenopausal women.
Bunyavejchevin S; Triratanachat S; Kankeow K; Limpaphayom KK
J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Jun; 84 Suppl 1():S326-30. PubMed ID: 11529353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness of strategies to evaluate postmenopausal bleeding.
Feldman S; Berkowitz RS; Tosteson AN
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):968-75. PubMed ID: 8497365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Two-year follow-up of 263 patients with post/perimenopausal vaginal bleeding and negative initial biopsy.
Feldman S; Shapter A; Welch WR; Berkowitz RS
Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Oct; 55(1):56-9. PubMed ID: 7959267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance characteristics of the Indiana University Medical Center endometrial sampler (Tao Brush) in an outpatient office setting, first year's outcomes: recognizing histological patterns in cytology preparations of endometrial brushings.
Maksem JA
Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Mar; 22(3):186-95. PubMed ID: 10680001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of Pipelle Mark II sampling in endometrial disease diagnosis.
Polena V; Mergui JL; Zerat L; Sananes S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Oct; 134(2):233-7. PubMed ID: 17029754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the Z-sampler and Novak endometrial biopsy instruments for in-office diagnosis of endometrial cancer.
Larson DM; Krawisz BR; Johnson KK; Broste SK
Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Jul; 54(1):64-7. PubMed ID: 8020841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A pilot study to evaluate the relative efficacy of endometrial biopsy and full curettage in making a diagnosis of endometriosis by the detection of endometrial nerve fibers.
Al-Jefout M; Andreadis N; Tokushige N; Markham R; Fraser I
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Dec; 197(6):578.e1-4. PubMed ID: 18060940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Coexisting endometrial cancer in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia.
Bilgin T; Ozuysal S; Ozan H; Atakan T
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2004 Jun; 30(3):205-9. PubMed ID: 15210044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
