BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11400482)

  • 1. [Retrospective comparative study of extended nephrectomies by surgery and by retroperitoneal laparoscopy].
    Kadji JF; Armand C; Gimbergues P; Blanc F; Tostain J
    Prog Urol; 2001 Apr; 11(2):223-30. PubMed ID: 11400482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Retrospective study of laparoscopic retroperitoneal radical nephrectomy].
    Hétet JF; Rigaud J; Renaudin K; Battisti S; Braud G; Bouchot O; Karam G
    Prog Urol; 2005 Feb; 15(1):10-7; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 15822385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: a comparative study.
    Taue R; Izaki H; Koizumi T; Kishimoto T; Oka N; Fukumori T; Takahashi M; Kanayama HO
    Int J Urol; 2009 Mar; 16(3):263-7. PubMed ID: 19087210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cancer--a report of 43 cases].
    Luo JH; Chen W; Chen LW; Sun XZ; Chen JX; Li XF; Mei H
    Ai Zheng; 2007 Jun; 26(6):629-32. PubMed ID: 17562270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Retrospective study of laparoscopic peritoneal radical nephrectomy].
    Cicco A; Salomon L; Gasman D; Hoznek A; Chopin D; Abbou CC
    Prog Urol; 1999 Jun; 9(3):453-9. PubMed ID: 10434316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for large renal tumors: a long-term prospective comparison.
    Hemal AK; Kumar A; Kumar R; Wadhwa P; Seth A; Gupta NP
    J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):862-6. PubMed ID: 17296361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a single-center experience of 100 cases.
    Okegawa T; Noda H; Horie S; Nutahara K; Higashihara E
    Int J Urol; 2008 Oct; 15(11):957-60. PubMed ID: 18775034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: surgical experience and outcomes.
    Pyo P; Chen A; Grasso M
    J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1279-83. PubMed ID: 18707736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospective randomized comparison of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.
    Desai MM; Strzempkowski B; Matin SF; Steinberg AP; Ng C; Meraney AM; Kaouk JH; Gill IS
    J Urol; 2005 Jan; 173(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 15592021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term follow-up of hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for organ-confined renal cell carcinoma.
    Chung SD; Huang KH; Lai MK; Huang CY; Pu YS; Yu HJ; Chueh SC
    Urology; 2007 Apr; 69(4):652-5. PubMed ID: 17445645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Retroperitoneal laparoscopic surgery and carcinogenic risk].
    Cicco A; Salomon L; Saint F; Hoznek A; Chopin D; Abbou CC
    Prog Urol; 2001 Feb; 11(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 11296653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors.
    Gill IS; Kavoussi LR; Lane BR; Blute ML; Babineau D; Colombo JR; Frank I; Permpongkosol S; Weight CJ; Kaouk JH; Kattan MW; Novick AC
    J Urol; 2007 Jul; 178(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 17574056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Comparative study of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and traditional open procedure: analysis of 26 cases].
    Ou TW; Zhang Y; Cui X; Zhang B
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Sep; 87(36):2549-51. PubMed ID: 18067831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: techniques, results and oncological outcome in 125 consecutive cases.
    Wille AH; Roigas J; Deger S; Tüllmann M; Türk I; Loening SA
    Eur Urol; 2004 Apr; 45(4):483-8; discussion 488-9. PubMed ID: 15041113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches.
    Wright JL; Porter JR
    J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):841-5. PubMed ID: 16093966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laparoscopic vs open partial nephrectomy in consecutive patients: the Cornell experience.
    Schiff JD; Palese M; Vaughan ED; Sosa RE; Coll D; Del Pizzo JJ
    BJU Int; 2005 Oct; 96(6):811-4. PubMed ID: 16153207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Complications of contemporary radical nephrectomy: comparison of open vs. laparoscopic approach.
    Shuford MD; McDougall EM; Chang SS; LaFleur BJ; Smith JA; Cookson MS
    Urol Oncol; 2004; 22(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 15082009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of surgical margins in renal cell carcinoma after nephron sparing: a comparative study: laparoscopy vs open surgery.
    Porpiglia F; Fiori C; Terrone C; Bollito E; Fontana D; Scarpa RM
    J Urol; 2005 Apr; 173(4):1098-101. PubMed ID: 15758709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Single-incision, umbilical laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes and short-term measures of convalescence.
    Raman JD; Bagrodia A; Cadeddu JA
    Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1198-204. PubMed ID: 18715694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Oncologic outcome of hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.
    Kawauchi A; Yoneda K; Fujito A; Okihara K; Soh J; Naitoh Y; Mizutani Y; Miki T
    Urology; 2007 Jan; 69(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 17270613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.