These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11401662)

  • 1. A structured interview guide increases Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale reliability in raters with low clinical experience.
    Crippa JA; Sanches RF; Hallak JE; Loureiro SR; Zuardi AW
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2001 Jun; 103(6):465-70. PubMed ID: 11401662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sources of unreliability in depression ratings.
    Kobak KA; Brown B; Sharp I; Levy-Mack H; Wells K; Ockun F; Williams JB
    J Clin Psychopharmacol; 2009 Feb; 29(1):82-5. PubMed ID: 19142114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability of an Italian standardized and expanded Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS 4.0) in raters with high vs. low clinical experience.
    Roncone R; Ventura J; Impallomeni M; Falloon IR; Morosini PL; Chiaravalle E; Casacchia M
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 1999 Sep; 100(3):229-36. PubMed ID: 10493090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of BPRS interview length on ratings reliability in a schizophrenia trial.
    Targum SD; Cara Pendergrass J; Toner C; Zumpano L; Rauh P; DeMartinis N
    Eur Neuropsychopharmacol; 2015 Mar; 25(3):312-8. PubMed ID: 25554563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development and reliability of a structured interview guide for the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (SIGMA).
    Williams JB; Kobak KA
    Br J Psychiatry; 2008 Jan; 192(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 18174510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability of the modified Rankin Scale across multiple raters: benefits of a structured interview.
    Wilson JT; Hareendran A; Hendry A; Potter J; Bone I; Muir KW
    Stroke; 2005 Apr; 36(4):777-81. PubMed ID: 15718510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inter-rater reliability of ratings on the six-item Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-6) obtained using the Simplified Negative and Positive Symptoms Interview (SNAPSI).
    Kølbæk P; Blicher AB; Buus CW; Feller SG; Holm T; Dines D; O'Leary KM; Sørensen RS; Opler M; Correll CU; Mors O; Bech P; Østergaard SD
    Nord J Psychiatry; 2018 Aug; 72(6):431-436. PubMed ID: 30037286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Application of telepsychiatry: a preliminary study.
    Matsuura S; Hosaka T; Yukiyama T; Ogushi Y; Okada Y; Haruki Y; Nakamura M
    Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2000 Feb; 54(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 15558880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A structured interview guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.
    Williams JB
    Arch Gen Psychiatry; 1988 Aug; 45(8):742-7. PubMed ID: 3395203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Inter-clinician reliability of the Mexican version of Goldberg's "Standardized Psychiatric Interview"].
    Campillo-Serrano C; Caraveo Anduaga J; Medina-Mora ME; Martinez-Lanz P
    Acta Psiquiatr Psicol Am Lat; 1981 Mar; 27(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 7348067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A revised anchored version of the BPRS-C for childhood psychiatric disorders.
    Hughes CW; Rintelmann J; Emslie GJ; Lopez M; MacCabe N
    J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol; 2001; 11(1):77-93. PubMed ID: 11322749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability of global assessment of functioning ratings made by clinical psychiatric staff.
    Söderberg P; Tungström S; Armelius BA
    Psychiatr Serv; 2005 Apr; 56(4):434-8. PubMed ID: 15812093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) in a naturalistic clinical setting: Inter-rater reliability and comparison with expert ratings.
    Lundh A; Kowalski J; Sundberg CJ; Gumpert C; Landén M
    Psychiatry Res; 2010 May; 177(1-2):206-10. PubMed ID: 20334931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Telepsychiatry: assessment of televideo psychiatric interview reliability with present- and next-generation internet infrastructures.
    Yoshino A; Shigemura J; Kobayashi Y; Nomura S; Shishikura K; Den R; Wakisaka H; Kamata S; Ashida H
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2001 Sep; 104(3):223-6. PubMed ID: 11531660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Psychometric evaluation of a standardized and expanded Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale.
    Hafkenscheid A
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 1991 Sep; 84(3):294-300. PubMed ID: 1950632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differences in inter-rater reliability and accuracy for a treatment adherence scale.
    Wu SM; Whiteside U; Neighbors C
    Cogn Behav Ther; 2007; 36(4):230-9. PubMed ID: 18049948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and the Brief Symptom Inventory.
    Morlan KK; Tan SY
    J Clin Psychol; 1998 Nov; 54(7):885-94. PubMed ID: 9811126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Structured assessment of current mental state in clinical practice: an international study of the reliability and validity of the Current Psychiatric State interview, CPS-50.
    Falloon IR; Mizuno M; Murakami M; Roncone R; Unoka Z; Harangozo J; Pullman J; Gedye R; Held T; Hager B; Erickson D; Burnett K;
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2005 Jan; 111(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 15636593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability of an interview approach to the Functional Independence Measure.
    Daving Y; Andrén E; Nordholm L; Grimby G
    Clin Rehabil; 2001 Jun; 15(3):301-10. PubMed ID: 11386401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Translation and validation of a French version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)].
    Favre S; Aubry JM; Gex-Fabry M; Ragama-Pardos E; McQuillan A; Bertschy G
    Encephale; 2003; 29(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 15029084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.