These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11401731)

  • 1. How accurate is a second-trimester prenatal ultrasound in the diagnosis of Down syndrome?
    Smalley C
    J Fam Pract; 2001 Jun; 50(6):490. PubMed ID: 11401731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transvaginal sonographic examination of the fetal nasal bone is unable to predict Down syndrome at 14-16 weeks' gestation.
    Bronshtein M; Blazer S; Zimmer EZ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jun; 25(6):625-7. PubMed ID: 15909314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Incidental finding of ultrasound markers for Down syndrome in the second trimester of pregnancy: a case study.
    Ball JR; Van Riper M; Engstrom JL; Matheson JK
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2005; 50(3):243-5. PubMed ID: 15895004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Second-trimester ultrasound markers for the detection of Down's syndrome: are they worth the effort.
    Goldberg JD
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jul; 12(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 9697276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can the risk for Down syndrome be reliably modified by second-trimester ultrasonography?
    Palomaki GE; Haddow JE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Nov; 173(5):1639-40. PubMed ID: 7503224
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening for trisomy 21 during the routine second-trimester ultrasound examination in an unselected Chilean population.
    Parra-Cordero M; Quiroz L; Rencoret G; Pedraza D; Muñoz H; Soto-Chacón E; Miranda-Mendoza I
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Dec; 30(7):946-51. PubMed ID: 17987599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Screening for Down syndrome using first-trimester combined screening followed by second-trimester ultrasound examination in an unselected population.
    Rozenberg P; Bussières L; Chevret S; Bernard JP; Malagrida L; Cuckle H; Chabry C; Durand-Zaleski I; Bidat L; Lacroix I; Moulis M; Roger M; Jacquemot MC; Bault JP; Boukobza P; Boccara P; Vialard F; Giudicelli Y; Ville Y
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Nov; 195(5):1379-87. PubMed ID: 16723105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Prenatal screening for Down's syndrome--moving from the second to the first trimester of pregnancy].
    Maymon R; Herman A; Dreazen C; Bukovsky I; Weinraub Z
    Harefuah; 1998 Feb; 134(4):296-301. PubMed ID: 10909510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of ultrasound in screening for fetal Down syndrome.
    Egan JF
    Curr Womens Health Rep; 2002 Feb; 2(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 12112983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of ultrasound in screening for Down syndrome.
    Resta RG; Nyberg D
    Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser; 1990; 26(3):104. PubMed ID: 2151180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of sonographic markers to determine the risk of Down syndrome in second-trimester fetuses.
    Benacerraf BR
    Radiology; 1996 Dec; 201(3):619-20. PubMed ID: 8939206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Second trimester ultrasound screening for chromosomal abnormalities.
    Shipp TD; Benacerraf BR
    Prenat Diagn; 2002 Apr; 22(4):296-307. PubMed ID: 11981910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Ultrasound markers of Down's syndrome during the second trimester--guidelines of the Israeli Association of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Israeli Association of Medical Genetics].
    ;
    Harefuah; 2014 Jun; 153(6):356-8. PubMed ID: 25095611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Advancing further the sonographic estimation of Down syndrome risk--how early can we go?
    Benacerraf B
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Feb; 31(2):129-31. PubMed ID: 18254162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genetic sonography after first-trimester Down syndrome screening.
    Krantz DA; Hallahan TW; Macri VJ; Macri JN
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 29(6):666-70. PubMed ID: 17492748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prenatal diagnosis of 48,XYY, +21 ascertained through ultrasound anomalies.
    Gollop TR; Naccache NF; Auler-Bittencourt E; Hauschild D; Eigier A; Zveibil DK
    Am J Med Genet; 1991 Apr; 39(1):76-7. PubMed ID: 1831009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The mid-trimester genetic sonogram.
    Bahado-Singh RO; Oz UA; Mendilcioglu I; Mahoney MJ
    Semin Perinatol; 2005 Aug; 29(4):209-14. PubMed ID: 16104670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimizing risk reduction in screening for Down syndrome.
    Wyatt PR
    Prenat Diagn; 2007 Dec; 27(13):1268. PubMed ID: 18046735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. First-trimester sonographic screening for Down syndrome.
    Wapner R; Platt LD;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 May; 103(5 Pt 1):999-1000; author reply 1001. PubMed ID: 15121583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Second trimester prenatal ultrasound for the detection of pregnancies at increased risk of Down syndrome.
    Smith-Bindman R; Chu P; Goldberg JD
    Prenat Diagn; 2007 Jun; 27(6):535-44. PubMed ID: 17367102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.