BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

59 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11402875)

  • 21. Comparison of reading time between screen-film mammography and soft-copied, full-field digital mammography.
    Ishiyama M; Tsunoda-Shimizu H; Kikuchi M; Saida Y; Hiramatsu S
    Breast Cancer; 2009; 16(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 18836795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Workflow improvement and efficiency gain with near total digitalization of a radiology department].
    Langen HL; Bielmeier J; Wittenberg G; Selbach R; Feustel H
    Rofo; 2003 Oct; 175(10):1309-16. PubMed ID: 14556098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of microcalcifications: diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a clinical setting.
    Uematsu T; Kasami M; Uchida Y
    Acta Radiol; 2007 Sep; 48(7):714-20. PubMed ID: 17729000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Method of simulating dose reduction for digital radiographic systems.
    Båth M; Håkansson M; Tingberg A; Månsson LG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):253-9. PubMed ID: 15933117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Display of CT studies on a two-screen electronic workstation versus a film panel alternator: sensitivity and efficiency among radiologists.
    Foley WD; Jacobson DR; Taylor AJ; Goodman LR; Stewart ET; Gurney JW; Stroka D
    Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):769-73. PubMed ID: 2305060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Application of digital image processing techniques in cephalometry].
    Jäger A; Doler W; Bockermann V; Steinhöfel N; Radlanski RJ
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Mar; 44(3):184-6. PubMed ID: 2639033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparative study of a digital radiography system.
    Lai KW; Langlois SL
    Australas Radiol; 1999 May; 43(2):197-200. PubMed ID: 10901901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of the effectiveness of digital radiography in emergency situations.
    Pathi R; Langlois S
    Australas Radiol; 2002 Jun; 46(2):167-9. PubMed ID: 12060155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Experimental study of the visual search in the process of the analysis of x-rays].
    Urvantsev LP
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1976; (1):93-7. PubMed ID: 1266016
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Artifacts in digital radiography.
    Jiménez DA; Armbrust LJ; O'Brien RT; Biller DS
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2008; 49(4):321-32. PubMed ID: 18720761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Chest radiography: potential and limitations.
    Schaefer-Prokop C
    Minerva Anestesiol; 1999 May; 65(5 Suppl 1):10-1. PubMed ID: 10389418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Use of image processing presets in chest radiography.
    Krupinski E; Ovitt T; Evanoff M
    J Digit Imaging; 1997 Aug; 10(3 Suppl 1):181-2. PubMed ID: 9268876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Comparison of evaluation of radiographic pictures carried out by 2 two-person teams].
    Hornung S
    Gruzlica; 1967 Sep; 35(9):911-4. PubMed ID: 6056268
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Control reading of fluorograms (an experimental study)].
    Bogdanov LN; Talanov IuM; Iurchuk-Kolossovskiĭ VI
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1971; 46(6):84-5. PubMed ID: 5155507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. DUAL READING.
    Tubercle; 1956 Oct; 37(5):363-4. PubMed ID: 13371692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Reading behavior and leasure time].
    Horvath AM
    Osterr Krankenpflegez; 1993; 46(6-7):23. PubMed ID: 8351152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Illuminated box for reading sensitivity tests.
    DICKINSON TH
    Treat Serv Bull; 1954 Feb; 9(2):59-60. PubMed ID: 13146817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Digital-controlled electrooptic 1 x 2 switch for time-division multiplexing and data encoding.
    Koai KT; Liu PL
    Appl Opt; 1986 Nov; 25(22):3968-70. PubMed ID: 20454028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reading efficiency in flickering light.
    Poulton EC; Kendall PG; Thomas RJ
    Nature; 1966 Mar; 209(5029):1267-8. PubMed ID: 5956334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reading outside the box.
    Fulton JS
    Clin Nurse Spec; 2013; 27(5):219-20. PubMed ID: 23942097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.