BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11403214)

  • 21. Surrogate decision making: do we have to trade off accuracy and procedural satisfaction?
    Frey R; Hertwig R; Herzog SM
    Med Decis Making; 2014 Feb; 34(2):258-69. PubMed ID: 23360917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Surrogates' predictions of seriously ill patients' resuscitation preferences.
    Layde PM; Beam CA; Broste SK; Connors AF; Desbiens N; Lynn J; Phillips RS; Reding D; Teno J; Vidaillet H
    Arch Fam Med; 1995 Jun; 4(6):518-23. PubMed ID: 7773427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Stability of older adults' preferences for life-sustaining medical treatment.
    Ditto PH; Smucker WD; Danks JH; Jacobson JA; Houts RM; Fagerlin A; Coppola KM; Gready RM
    Health Psychol; 2003 Nov; 22(6):605-15. PubMed ID: 14640858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. False memories for end-of-life decisions.
    Sharman SJ; Garry M; Jacobsen JA; Loftus EF; Ditto PH
    Health Psychol; 2008 Mar; 27(2):291-6. PubMed ID: 18377150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Attitudes and behaviors of Japanese physicians concerning withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment for end-of-life patients: results from an Internet survey.
    Bito S; Asai A
    BMC Med Ethics; 2007 Jun; 8():7. PubMed ID: 17577420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Concordance of preferences for end-of-life care between terminally ill cancer patients and their family caregivers in Taiwan.
    Tang ST; Liu TW; Lai MS; Liu LN; Chen CH
    J Pain Symptom Manage; 2005 Dec; 30(6):510-8. PubMed ID: 16376737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Context changes choices: a prospective study of the effects of hospitalization on life-sustaining treatment preferences.
    Ditto PH; Jacobson JA; Smucker WD; Danks JH; Fagerlin A
    Med Decis Making; 2006; 26(4):313-22. PubMed ID: 16855121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Influence of Surrogate Decision Makers on Clinical Decision Making for Critically Ill Adults.
    Shah RD; Rasinski KA; Alexander GC
    J Intensive Care Med; 2015 Jul; 30(5):278-85. PubMed ID: 24362444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: a systematic review.
    Shalowitz DI; Garrett-Mayer E; Wendler D
    Arch Intern Med; 2006 Mar; 166(5):493-7. PubMed ID: 16534034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A voice for the dying.
    Meeker MA; Jezewski MA
    Clin Nurs Res; 2004 Nov; 13(4):326-42. PubMed ID: 15448283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A prospective study of primary surrogate decision makers' knowledge of intensive care.
    Rodriguez RM; Navarrete E; Schwaber J; McKleroy W; Clouse A; Kerrigan SF; Fortman J
    Crit Care Med; 2008 May; 36(5):1633-6. PubMed ID: 18434916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The surrogate's experience during treatment decision-making.
    Jeffers BR
    Medsurg Nurs; 1998 Dec; 7(6):357-63. PubMed ID: 10036440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Surrogate consent for genomics research in intensive care.
    Shelton AK; Fish AF; Cobb JP; Bachman JA; Jenkins RL; Battistich V; Freeman BD
    Am J Crit Care; 2009 Sep; 18(5):418-26; quiz 427. PubMed ID: 19723862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Choosing life support for suddenly severely ill elderly relatives.
    Corke CF; Lavery JF; Gibson AM
    Crit Care Resusc; 2005 Jun; 7(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 16548797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Health-care decision making, Part II. Choices for incapacitated patients.
    Grant K; Huntington SR
    Physician Assist; 1989 Jul; 13(7):76-86. PubMed ID: 10293914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Elderly adults' preferences for life-sustaining treatments: the role of impairment, prognosis, and pain.
    Coppola KM; Bookwala J; Ditto PH; Lockhart LK; Danks JH; Smucker WD
    Death Stud; 1999; 23(7):617-34. PubMed ID: 10915454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Trial of Ascertaining Individual Preferences for Loved Ones' Role in End-of-Life Decisions (TAILORED) Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Improve Surrogate Decision Making.
    Sulmasy DP; Hughes MT; Yenokyan G; Kub J; Terry PB; Astrow AB; Johnson JA; Ho G; Nolan MT
    J Pain Symptom Manage; 2017 Oct; 54(4):455-465. PubMed ID: 28712987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Discrepancies in end-of-life decisions between elderly patients and their named surrogates.
    Foo AS; Lee TW; Soh CR
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 2012 Apr; 41(4):141-53. PubMed ID: 22635278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The accuracy of surrogate decisions in intensive care scenarios.
    Li LL; Cheong KY; Yaw LK; Liu EH
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2007 Feb; 35(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 17323665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Knowing loved ones' end-of-life health care wishes: attachment security predicts caregivers' accuracy.
    Turan B; Goldstein MK; Garber AM; Carstensen LL
    Health Psychol; 2011 Nov; 30(6):814-8. PubMed ID: 22081941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.