These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

632 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11404603)

  • 1. Results of the bone-anchored hearing aid in unilateral hearing loss.
    Wazen JJ; Spitzer J; Ghossaini SN; Kacker A; Zschommler A
    Laryngoscope; 2001 Jun; 111(6):955-8. PubMed ID: 11404603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bone-anchored hearing aid system application for unilateral congenital conductive hearing impairment: audiometric results.
    Kunst SJ; Leijendeckers JM; Mylanus EA; Hol MK; Snik AF; Cremers CW
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Jan; 29(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 18199951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bone-anchored Hearing Aids: correlation between pure-tone thresholds and outcome in three user groups.
    Pfiffner F; Kompis M; Stieger C
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):884-90. PubMed ID: 19730146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rehabilitation of patients with conductive hearing loss and moderate mental retardation by means of a bone-anchored hearing aid.
    Kunst SJ; Hol MK; Snik AF; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):653-8. PubMed ID: 16788427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does the bone-anchored hearing aid have a complementary effect on audiological and subjective outcomes in patients with unilateral conductive hearing loss?
    Hol MK; Snik AF; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Audiol Neurootol; 2005; 10(3):159-68. PubMed ID: 15724087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The bone-anchored hearing aid: quality-of-life assessment.
    Hol MK; Spath MA; Krabbe PF; van der Pouw CT; Snik AF; Cremers CW; Mylanus EA
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 Apr; 130(4):394-9. PubMed ID: 15096420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Longitudinal benefit from and satisfaction with the Baha system for patients with acquired unilateral sensorineural hearing loss.
    Newman CW; Sandridge SA; Wodzisz LM
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Dec; 29(8):1123-31. PubMed ID: 19034196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. BAHA in children and adolescents with unilateral or bilateral conductive hearing loss: a study of outcome.
    Priwin C; Jönsson R; Hultcrantz M; Granström G
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Jan; 71(1):135-45. PubMed ID: 17092570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term results with the titanium bone-anchored hearing aid: the U.S. experience.
    Wazen JJ; Caruso M; Tjellstrom A
    Am J Otol; 1998 Nov; 19(6):737-41. PubMed ID: 9831146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy of the bone-anchored hearing aid for single-sided deafness.
    Linstrom CJ; Silverman CA; Yu GP
    Laryngoscope; 2009 Apr; 119(4):713-20. PubMed ID: 19266579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hearing rehabilitation in congenital aural atresia using the bone-anchored hearing aid: audiological and satisfaction results.
    Fuchsmann C; Tringali S; Disant F; Buiret G; Dubreuil C; Froehlich P; Truy E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2010 Dec; 130(12):1343-51. PubMed ID: 20735185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The evidence base for the application of contralateral bone anchored hearing aids in acquired unilateral sensorineural hearing loss in adults.
    Baguley DM; Bird J; Humphriss RL; Prevost AT
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2006 Feb; 31(1):6-14. PubMed ID: 16441794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The bone-anchored hearing aid compared with conventional hearing aids. Audiologic results and the patients' opinions.
    Snik AF; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1995 Feb; 28(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 7739870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparisons of sound processors based on osseointegrated implants in patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss.
    Pfiffner F; Caversaccio MD; Kompis M
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jul; 32(5):728-35. PubMed ID: 21646934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Latent demand for the bone-anchored hearing aid: the Lippy Group experience.
    Burkey JM; Berenholz LP; Lippy WH;
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):648-52. PubMed ID: 16868512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification.
    Lin LM; Bowditch S; Anderson MJ; May B; Cox KM; Niparko JK
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 16436986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bilateral bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHAs): an audiometric evaluation.
    Priwin C; Stenfelt S; Granström G; Tjellström A; Håkansson B
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Jan; 114(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 14709999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Audiometric evaluation of bilaterally fitted bone-anchored hearing aids.
    Bosman AJ; Snik AF; van der Pouw CT; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Audiology; 2001; 40(3):158-67. PubMed ID: 11465298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Better performance with bone-anchored hearing aid than acoustic devices in patients with severe air-bone gap.
    de Wolf MJ; Hendrix S; Cremers CW; Snik AF
    Laryngoscope; 2011 Mar; 121(3):613-6. PubMed ID: 21344443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term results of bone-anchored hearing aid recipients who had previously used air-conduction hearing aids.
    Hol MK; Snik AF; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2005 Apr; 131(4):321-5. PubMed ID: 15837900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.