806 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11404759)
1. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature.
Geng JP; Tan KB; Liu GR
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):585-98. PubMed ID: 11404759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of cantilever length and implant inclination on stress distribution in maxillary implant-supported fixed dentures.
Bevilacqua M; Tealdo T; Menini M; Pera F; Mossolov A; Drago C; Pera P
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jan; 105(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 21194582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of implant diameter, insertion depth, and loading angle on stress/strain fields in implant/jawbone systems: finite element analysis.
Qian L; Todo M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):877-86. PubMed ID: 19865628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implant screw mechanics.
McGlumphy EA; Mendel DA; Holloway JA
Dent Clin North Am; 1998 Jan; 42(1):71-89. PubMed ID: 9421671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors affecting crestal bone loss with dental implants partially covered with a porous coating: a finite element analysis.
Vaillancourt H; Pilliar RM; McCammond D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(3):351-9. PubMed ID: 8752556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Finite element stress analysis of the influence of staggered versus straight placement of dental implants.
Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):722-30. PubMed ID: 11669255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Syncrystallization: a technique for temporization of immediately loaded implants with metal-reinforced acrylic resin restorations.
Degidi M; Gehrke P; Spanel A; Piattelli A
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(3):123-34. PubMed ID: 16919020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of finite element analysis to model bone-implant contact with basal implants.
Ihde S; Goldmann T; Himmlova L; Aleksic Z
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jul; 106(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 18439855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Finite element analysis of stress in bone adjacent to dental implants.
Rubo JH; Souza EA
J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(5):248-55. PubMed ID: 19170290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [A biomechanical study of the mechanical stress transmission of dental implants using finite element analysis. Review of literature. Part I].
Szucs A; Divinyi T; Lorincz A
Fogorv Sz; 2006 Aug; 99(4):141-7. PubMed ID: 17016921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The staggered installation of dental implants and its effect on bone stresses.
Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; Jagger DC; Hammerle CH
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 17716255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A finite element stress analysis of the transmandibular implant system.
Williams KR; Murphy WM
Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 11843446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Application of the finite element method in dental implant research.
Van Staden RC; Guan H; Loo YC
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2006 Aug; 9(4):257-70. PubMed ID: 17132532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Selection of the implant transgingival height for optimal biomechanical properties: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Sun Y; Kong L; Hu K; Xie C; Zhou H; Liu Y; Liu B
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 47(5):393-8. PubMed ID: 18977057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical response of implant systems placed in the maxillary posterior region under various conditions of angulation, bone density, and loading.
Lin CL; Wang JC; Ramp LC; Liu PR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 18416413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of clinically relevant factors on the immediate biomechanical surrounding for a series of dental implant designs.
Shunmugasamy VC; Gupta N; Pessoa RS; Janal MN; Coelho PG
J Biomech Eng; 2011 Mar; 133(3):031005. PubMed ID: 21303181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Finite element stress analysis of edentulous mandibles with different bone types supporting multiple-implant superstructures.
de Almeida EO; Rocha EP; Freitas AC; Freitas MM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1108-14. PubMed ID: 21197486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical analysis on platform switching: is there any biomechanical rationale?
Maeda Y; Miura J; Taki I; Sogo M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):581-4. PubMed ID: 17608737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
