227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11404917)
1. Posterior restoration using laboratory-fabricated composite resin inlays/onlays.
Lowe E; Rego NA
Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 2000 Apr; 12(3):279-83. PubMed ID: 11404917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure.
Hickel R; Manhart J
J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(1):45-64. PubMed ID: 11317384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Combining bonded and cemented restorations: a multitechnique case study.
Shannon A
Dent Today; 2000 Apr; 19(4):54, 56, 58-61; quiz 61, 151. PubMed ID: 19750729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of cement type on the marginal adaptation of all-ceramic MOD inlays.
Rosentritt M; Behr M; Lang R; Handel G
Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 15081553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of gap size and cement type on gingival microleakage in Class V resin composite inlays.
Browning WD; Safirstein J
Quintessence Int; 1997 Aug; 28(8):541-4. PubMed ID: 9477882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Time required to remove totally bonded tooth-colored posterior restorations and related tooth substance loss.
Krejci I; Lieber CM; Lutz F
Dent Mater; 1995 Jan; 11(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 7498606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
Mendonça JS; Neto RG; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Navarro MF; de Carvalho RM
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Long-term clinical evaluation of 2 dental materials used for the preparation of esthetic inlays].
Khairallah C; Hokayem A
Odontostomatol Trop; 2009 Sep; 32(127):5-13. PubMed ID: 20441124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years: clinical behavior.
Frankenberger R; Petschelt A; Krämer N
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):459-65. PubMed ID: 11203857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biocompatibility of posterior restorative materials.
Schuster GS; Lefebvre CA; Wataha JC; White SN
J Calif Dent Assoc; 1996 Sep; 24(9):17-31. PubMed ID: 9120609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interfacial gaps following ceramic inlay cementation vs direct composites.
Iida K; Inokoshi S; Kurosaki N
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 12877431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Clinical study comparing at 5 years a ceramic and a ceromer used for making esthetic inlays].
Khairallah C; Sabbagh J; Hokayem A
Odontostomatol Trop; 2009 Jun; 32(126):21-8. PubMed ID: 20069963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dental amalgam--what are the alternatives?
Tyas MJ
Int Dent J; 1994 Aug; 44(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 7822054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of different cements on the fracture resistance and marginal adaptation of all-ceramic and fiber-reinforced crowns.
Behr M; Rosentritt M; Mangelkramer M; Handel G
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(5):538-42. PubMed ID: 14651242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Management of extensive carious lesions in permanent molars of a child with nonmetallic bonded restorations--a case report.
el-Mowafy O
J Can Dent Assoc; 2000 Jun; 66(6):302-7. PubMed ID: 10927895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro evaluation of microleakage of indirect composite inlays cemented with four luting agents.
Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Loos-Ayav C; Jacquot B; Panighi MM
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):563-70. PubMed ID: 15942618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fracture resistance of resin-based composite and ceramic inlays luted to sound human teeth.
da Silva SB; Hilgert LA; Busato AL
Am J Dent; 2004 Dec; 17(6):404-6. PubMed ID: 15724750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Microleakage associated with resin composite-cemented, cast glass ceramic restoration.
Blair KF; Koeppen RG; Schwartz RS; Davis RD
Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 8148030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Conservative restoration of compromised posterior teeth with direct composites: a 7-year report.
Magne P
Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 2000 Oct; 12(8):747-9. PubMed ID: 11404870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
