137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11404971)
1. Techniques used by a group of United Kingdom-based dental practitioners during the provision of indirect tooth-coloured restorations.
Hill MA; Burke FJ; Cheung SW; Qualtrough AJ; Wilson NH
Prim Dent Care; 2000 Apr; 7(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 11404971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations.
Krämer N; Lohbauer U; Frankenberger R
Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):60D-76D. PubMed ID: 11763920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Combining bonded and cemented restorations: a multitechnique case study.
Shannon A
Dent Today; 2000 Apr; 19(4):54, 56, 58-61; quiz 61, 151. PubMed ID: 19750729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Marginal adaptation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic veneers to Class 3 composite restorations in vitro.
Christgau M; Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Edelmann K
Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 10823069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contemporary dental practice in the UK: indirect restorations and fixed prosthodontics.
Brunton PA; Christensen GJ; Cheung SW; Burke FJ; Wilson NH
Br Dent J; 2005 Jan; 198(2):99-103; discussion 89. PubMed ID: 15702109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Marginal seal comparisons between resin-bonded Class II porcelain inlays, posterior composite restorations, and direct composite resin inlays.
Shortall AC; Baylis RL; Baylis MA; Grundy JR
Int J Prosthodont; 1989; 2(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 2699418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Benefits and disadvantages of tooth-coloured alternatives to amalgam.
Roulet JF
J Dent; 1997 Nov; 25(6):459-73. PubMed ID: 9604577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of tooth-coloured restorations in the management of toothwear.
Allen PF
Dent Update; 2003 Dec; 30(10):550-6. PubMed ID: 14710567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of stresses in molar teeth restored with inlays and direct restorations, including polymerization shrinkage of composite resin and tooth loading during mastication.
Dejak B; Młotkowski A
Dent Mater; 2015 Mar; 31(3):e77-87. PubMed ID: 25544104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Current use of tooth-colored inlays, onlays, and direct-placement resins.
Christensen GJ
J Esthet Dent; 1998; 10(6):290-5. PubMed ID: 10321198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of cement-curing modes on dentin bonding of inlays.
Zuellig-Singer R; Krejci I; Lutz F
J Dent Res; 1992 Nov; 71(11):1842-6. PubMed ID: 1401449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Aesthetic all-ceramic restorations: a philosophic and clinical review.
Mörig G
Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1996 Oct; 8(8):741-9; quiz 750. PubMed ID: 9242128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of different adhesive types and curing methods on microleakage and the marginal adaptation of composite veneers.
Maleknejad F; Moosavi H; Shahriari R; Sarabi N; Shayankhah T
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 May; 10(3):18-26. PubMed ID: 19430622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Resin-modified glass ionomers for luting posterior ceramic restorations.
Thonemann B; Federlin M; Schmalz G; Hiller KA
Dent Mater; 1995 May; 11(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 8600007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Porcelain veneers bonded to tooth structure: an ultra-morphological FE-SEM examination of the adhesive interface.
Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Yoshida Y; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
Dent Mater; 1999 Mar; 15(2):105-19. PubMed ID: 10551102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bonding porcelain laminate veneer provisional restorations: An experimental study.
Dumfahrt H; Göbel G
J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Sep; 82(3):281-5. PubMed ID: 10479253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Physical properties of dual-cured luting-agents correlated to early no interfacial-gap incidence with composite inlay restorations.
Irie M; Maruo Y; Nishigawa G; Suzuki K; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2010 Jun; 26(6):608-15. PubMed ID: 20334906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dental practice in the UK in 2015/2016. Part 3: aspects of indirect restorations and fixed prosthodontics.
Jum'ah AA; Creanor S; Wilson NHF; Burke FJT; Brunton PA
Br Dent J; 2019 Feb; 226(3):192-196. PubMed ID: 30734749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars.
Cobankara FK; Unlu N; Cetin AR; Ozkan HB
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):526-33. PubMed ID: 18833859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
