198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11405001)
21. Treatment of gingival recession with a modified "tunnel" technique and an acellular dermal connective tissue allograft.
Mahn DH
Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2001; 13(1):69-74; quiz 76. PubMed ID: 11301532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Treatment of multiple adjacent maxillary Miller Class I, II, and III gingival recessions with the modified coronally advanced tunnel, enamel matrix derivative, and subepithelial connective tissue graft: A report of 12 cases.
Sculean A; Cosgarea R; Stähli A; Katsaros C; Arweiler NB; Miron RJ; Deppe H
Quintessence Int; 2016; 47(8):653-9. PubMed ID: 27446995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The free rotated papilla autograft: a new bilaminar grafting procedure for the coverage of multiple shallow gingival recessions.
Tinti C; Parma-Benfenati S
J Periodontol; 1996 Oct; 67(10):1016-24. PubMed ID: 8910842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Treatment of adjacent gingival recessions with subepithelial connective tissue grafts and the modified tunnel technique.
Tözüm TF; Dini FM
Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 12674352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A 6-month comparative clinical study of a conventional and a new surgical approach for root coverage with acellular dermal matrix.
Barros RR; Novaes AB; Grisi MF; Souza SL; Taba MJ; Palioto DB
J Periodontol; 2004 Oct; 75(10):1350-6. PubMed ID: 15562912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Root coverage with subepithelial connective tissue grafts and modified tunnel technique. An evaluation of long-term results.
Tözüm TF
N Y State Dent J; 2006; 72(4):38-41. PubMed ID: 16925012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Complete root coverage of Miller Class III recessions.
Esteibar JR; Zorzano LA; Cundín EE; Blanco JD; Medina JR
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2011; 31(4):e1-7. PubMed ID: 21837295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparative 6-month clinical study of a semilunar coronally positioned flap and subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of gingival recession.
Bittencourt S; Del Peloso Ribeiro E; Sallum EA; Sallum AW; Nociti FH; Casati MZ
J Periodontol; 2006 Feb; 77(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 16460241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The soft tissue wall technique for the regenerative treatment of non-contained infrabony defects: a case series.
Rasperini G; Acunzo R; Barnett A; Pagni G
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2013; 33(3):e79-87. PubMed ID: 23593632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Use of a new collagen matrix (mucograft) for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: case reports.
Rotundo R; Pini-Prato G
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2012 Aug; 32(4):413-9. PubMed ID: 22577647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparative study of two root coverage procedures: a 24-month follow-up multicenter study.
Moses O; Artzi Z; Sculean A; Tal H; Kozlovsky A; Romanos GE; Nemcovsky CE
J Periodontol; 2006 Feb; 77(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 16460244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Soft tissue root coverage as treatment for cervical abrasion and caries.
Camargo PM; Lagos RA; Lekovic V; Wolinsky LE
Gen Dent; 2001; 49(3):299-304. PubMed ID: 12004730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Histological evaluation of 4 cases of root coverage following a connective tissue graft combined with an enamel matrix derivative preparation.
Carnio J; Camargo PM; Kenney EB; Schenk RK
J Periodontol; 2002 Dec; 73(12):1534-43. PubMed ID: 12546106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Treatment of multiple recession-type defects in a young patient with esthetic demands].
Kolerman R; Goultschin J; Goldstein M
Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2002 Apr; 19(2):24-30, 77. PubMed ID: 12055707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Failure of root coverage of shallow gingival recessions employing GTR and a bioresorbable membrane.
Müller HP; Stahl M; Eger T
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2001 Apr; 21(2):171-81. PubMed ID: 11829391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of 2 clinical techniques for treatment of gingival recession.
Wang HL; Bunyaratavej P; Labadie M; Shyr Y; MacNeil RL
J Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 72(10):1301-11. PubMed ID: 11699470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Long-term outcome following treatment of multiple Miller class I and II recession defects in esthetic areas of the mouth.
Zucchelli G; De Sanctis M
J Periodontol; 2005 Dec; 76(12):2286-92. PubMed ID: 16332241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue. Part 2: Histological evaluation.
McGuire MK; Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 2003 Aug; 74(8):1126-35. PubMed ID: 14514225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Treatment of gingival recession: comparison of two techniques of subepithelial connective tissue graft.
Tözüm TF; Keçeli HG; Güncü GN; Hatipoğlu H; Sengün D
J Periodontol; 2005 Nov; 76(11):1842-8. PubMed ID: 16274302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of multiple gingival recession.
Dembowska E; Drozdzik A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Sep; 104(3):e1-7. PubMed ID: 17618142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
