235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11405049)
1. Occlusal caries diagnosis in molar teeth from bitewing and panoramic radiographs.
Thomas MF; Ricketts DN; Wilson RF
Prim Dent Care; 2001 Apr; 8(2):63-9. PubMed ID: 11405049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study.
Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Mostafa MS
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Proximal caries detection accuracy using intraoral bitewing radiography, extraoral bitewing radiography and panoramic radiography.
Kamburoglu K; Kolsuz E; Murat S; Yüksel S; Ozen T
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Sep; 41(6):450-9. PubMed ID: 22868296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of bitewing, periapical, unfiltered and filtered digital panoramic images for approximal caries detection in posterior teeth.
Akarslan ZZ; Akdevelioğlu M; Güngör K; Erten H
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):458-63. PubMed ID: 19033431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A prospective comparison between findings from a clinical examination and results of bitewing and panoramic radiographs for dental caries diagnosis in children.
Clark HC; Curzon ME
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2004 Dec; 5(4):203-9. PubMed ID: 15606318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing the accuracy of panoramic and intraoral radiography in the diagnosis of proximal caries.
Akkaya N; Kansu O; Kansu H; Cagirankaya LB; Arslan U
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 May; 35(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 16618850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reproducibility and accuracy of three methods for assessment of demineralization depth of the occlusal surface: an in vitro examination.
Ekstrand KR; Ricketts DN; Kidd EA
Caries Res; 1997; 31(3):224-31. PubMed ID: 9165195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro evaluation of ICDAS and radiographic examination of occlusal surfaces and their association with treatment decisions.
Diniz MB; Lima LM; Eckert G; Zandona AG; Cordeiro RC; Pinto LS
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 21777096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An in vitro comparison of the ability of fibre-optic transillumination, visual inspection and radiographs to detect occlusal caries and evaluate lesion depth.
Côrtes DF; Ekstrand KR; Elias-Boneta AR; Ellwood RP
Caries Res; 2000; 34(6):443-7. PubMed ID: 11093016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The sensitivity and specificity of clinical assessment compared with bitewing radiography for detection of occlusal dentin caries.
Fracaro MS; Seow WK; McAllan LH; Purdie DM
Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(3):204-10. PubMed ID: 11447949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In-vivo performance of impedance spectroscopy, laser fluorescence, and bitewing radiographs for occlusal caries detection.
Mortensen D; Hessing-Olsen I; Ekstrand KR; Twetman S
Quintessence Int; 2018; 49(4):293-299. PubMed ID: 29484311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Observer performance based on marginal bone tissue visibility in Scanora panoramic radiography and posterior bitewing radiography.
Ivanauskaite D; Lindh C; Rohlin M
Stomatologija; 2008; 10(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18493164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiographic detection of occlusal caries: effect of X-ray beam factors on diagnosis.
Ricketts D; Kidd E; Smith B; Wilson R
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1994 Jun; 2(4):149-54. PubMed ID: 8603138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of dentine caries using the oblique lateral radiograph.
Townsend D
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2000 Jun; 10(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 11310099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An evaluation of the diagnostic yield from bitewing radiographs of small approximal and occlusal carious lesions in a low prevalence sample in vitro using different film types and speeds.
Ricketts DN; Whaites EJ; Kidd EA; Brown JE; Wilson RF
Br Dent J; 1997 Jan; 182(2):51-8. PubMed ID: 9033139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of a ranked scoring system to detect occlusal caries in primary molars.
Dunkley S; Ashley P
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2007 Jul; 17(4):267-73. PubMed ID: 17559454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A clinical comparison of extraoral panoramic and intraoral radiographic modalities for detecting proximal caries and visualizing open posterior interproximal contacts.
Terry GL; Noujeim M; Langlais RP; Moore WS; Prihoda TJ
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150159. PubMed ID: 26869221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Additional diagnostic value of digital bitewing radiographs in detecting proximal caries in primary molars.
Madiraju G
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2011 Sep; 32(7):E115-9. PubMed ID: 23738994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Electrical methods in occlusal caries diagnosis: An in vitro comparison with visual inspection and bite-wing radiography.
Huysmans MC; Longbottom C; Pitts N
Caries Res; 1998; 32(5):324-9. PubMed ID: 9701656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical and radiographic judgement of occlusal caries in adolescents.
Poorterman JH; Weerheijm KL; Groen HJ; Kalsbeek H
Eur J Oral Sci; 2000 Apr; 108(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 10768720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
