253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11407136)
1. HCFA issues draft of Minimum Data Set for palliative care.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care; 2001; 18(2):85. PubMed ID: 11407136
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. OIG critical of CMS oversight of the Medicare hospice benefit.
Neigh JE
Caring; 2007 Aug; 26(8):66-8. PubMed ID: 17966313
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. HCFA responds to HAA Medicare hospice benefit questions.
Caring; 2001 Jun; 20(6):34-5. PubMed ID: 11392738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. CR 5567: Data collection in hospice: what it means to hospice providers.
Kennedy J
Home Healthc Nurse; 2008 May; 26(5):317-20. PubMed ID: 18469607
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Hospice: core and cornerstone of the end-of-life movement.
Caring; 2000 Sep; 19(9):46-9. PubMed ID: 11186751
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. HCFA responds to HAA survey & certification questions on the Medicare hospice benefit.
Caring; 2001 Jul; 20(7):34-6. PubMed ID: 11436462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. MDS (minimum data set) rules offer increased involvement in patient care issues.
Sherman D
Contemp Longterm Care; 1993 Mar; 16(3):86, 88. PubMed ID: 10125760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Standards and guidelines: do they matter?
Ferris FD
J Palliat Med; 2004 Dec; 7(6):750-2. PubMed ID: 15684841
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Resident assessments come up short.
Hegland A
Contemp Longterm Care; 1993 Jan; 16(1):53-4. PubMed ID: 10123527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Medicare revises signature guidelines for medical reviewers: wound care providers should read and implement them.
Schaum KD
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2010 Jun; 23(6):252-3. PubMed ID: 20489386
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Avoiding unnecessary medical reviews.
Gainey A
Provider; 1999 Jul; 25(7):87, 89, 91. PubMed ID: 10539091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Dialysis outcomes in works. HCFA may set quality, practice guidelines for ESRD program.
Gardner J
Mod Healthc; 1997 Feb; 27(5):64-5. PubMed ID: 10164704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Be a continence champion: use the CHAMMP tool to individualize the plan of care.
Bucci AT
Geriatr Nurs; 2007; 28(2):120-4; quiz 125. PubMed ID: 17430746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Another year of change.
Whittier S
Home Healthc Nurse; 2009; 27(10):587. PubMed ID: 19907232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. HCFA publishes final rule on resident assessments, electronic submission of MDS (minimum data set).
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1998 Jan; 6(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 10176608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. OASIS-C: hope for assessments that are clinically accurate and useful.
Narayan M
Home Healthc Nurse; 2009 Sep; 27(8):457-8. PubMed ID: 19745617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The new hospice interpretive guidelines: are hospice providers compliant?
Kennedy J
Home Healthc Nurse; 2009 Jun; 27(6):340-6. PubMed ID: 19509517
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Public information collection requirements submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for clearance--HCFA. Supporting statement for the CLIA application forms, HCFA-114 AND HCFA-116.
Fed Regist; 1992 Jun; 57(114 Pt 1):25041-59. PubMed ID: 10119325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Coping with the new AMA/HCFA documentation requirements.
Edelberg C
ED Manag; 1997 Dec; 9(12):153-6; suppl 2 p.. PubMed ID: 10175050
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Off the charts: teaching students in compliance with HCFA guidelines.
Chappelle KG; Blanchard SH; Ramirez-Williams MF; Fields SA
Fam Pract Manag; 2000 May; 7(5):37-41. PubMed ID: 10947347
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
