123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11407523)
1. Ultrastructural morphometry of nucleoli: potential usefulness for objective grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Lloreta-Trull J; Bielsa-Galí O; Domínguez-Solà D; Arumí-Uría M; Pavesi M; Gelabert A; Serrano-Figueras S
Ultrastruct Pathol; 2001; 25(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 11407523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Morphometric index of adult renal cell carcinoma. Comparison with the Fuhrman grading system.
Montironi R; Santinelli A; Pomante R; Mazzucchelli R; Colanzi P; Filho AL; Scarpelli M
Virchows Arch; 2000 Jul; 437(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 10963384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nucleolar grade but not Fuhrman grade is applicable to papillary renal cell carcinoma.
Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; McCredie MR; William Jordan T; Delahunt B
Am J Surg Pathol; 2006 Sep; 30(9):1091-6. PubMed ID: 16931953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma should be based on nucleolar prominence.
Delahunt B; Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; William Jordan T; Magi-Galluzzi C; Zhou M; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR
Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Aug; 35(8):1134-9. PubMed ID: 21716085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Value of morphometric nuclear image analysis using the Feulgen reaction in renal cell carcinoma.
Lee JS; Jung JJ; Lee MC; Park CS; Juhng SW; Oh BR; Moon JD
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2000 Feb; 22(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 10696458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nuclear morphometry as an important prognostic factor in stage I renal cell carcinoma.
Tosi P; Luzi P; Baak JP; Miracco C; Santopietro R; Vindigni C; Mattei FM; Acconcia A; Massai MR
Cancer; 1986 Dec; 58(11):2512-8. PubMed ID: 3768843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prognostic value of nuclear grade of renal cell carcinoma.
Bretheau D; Lechevallier E; de Fromont M; Sault MC; Rampal M; Coulange C
Cancer; 1995 Dec; 76(12):2543-9. PubMed ID: 8625083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nucleolar organizer regions and prognosis in renal cell carcinoma.
Delahunt B; Ribas JL; Nacey JN; Bethwaite PB
J Pathol; 1991 Jan; 163(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 2002422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Selective nuclear morphometry as a prognostic factor of survival in renal cell carcinoma.
Monge JM; Val-Bernal JF; Buelta L; García-Castrillo L; Asensio L
Histol Histopathol; 1999 Jan; 14(1):119-23. PubMed ID: 9987656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic value of karyometric and clinical characteristics in renal cell carcinoma. Quantitative assessment of tumor heterogeneity.
van der Poel HG; Mulders PF; Oosterhof GO; Schaafsma HE; Hendriks JC; Schalken JA; Debruyne FM
Cancer; 1993 Nov; 72(9):2667-74. PubMed ID: 8402488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Histological and cytological (nucleolar) grading of renal cell carcinoma].
Helpap B; Knüpffer J; Essmann S
Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol; 1989; 73():400-4. PubMed ID: 2482626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prediction of recurrence and nucleolar features in node-negative breast carcinoma, ductal type, grade II. An ultrastructural study.
Lloreta J; Ferrer D; Corominas JM; Pavesi M; Serrano S; Mackay B
Virchows Arch; 2002 Mar; 440(3):280-4. PubMed ID: 11889598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nucleolar grading of renal cancer. Correlation of frequency and localization of nucleoli to histologic and cytologic grading and stage of renal cell carcinomas.
Helpap B; Knüpffer J; Essmann S
Mod Pathol; 1990 Nov; 3(6):671-8. PubMed ID: 2263592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nuclear quantitative grading by discriminant analysis of renal cell carcinoma samples. A patient survival evaluation.
Artacho-Pérula E; Roldán-Villalobos R; Martínez-Cuevas JF; López-Rubio F
J Pathol; 1994 Jun; 173(2):105-14. PubMed ID: 8089804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fuhrman grading is not appropriate for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.
Delahunt B; Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; McCredie MR; Martignoni G; Eble JN; Jordan TW
Am J Surg Pathol; 2007 Jun; 31(6):957-60. PubMed ID: 17527087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computerized nuclear morphometry and survival in renal cell carcinoma: comparison with other prognostic indicators.
Delahunt B; Becker RL; Bethwaite PB; Ribas JL
Pathology; 1994 Oct; 26(4):353-8. PubMed ID: 7892031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultrastructural characteristics of human renal cell carcinoma in relation to the light microscopic grading.
Syrjänen K; Hjelt L
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 1978; 12(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 635487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Value of Führman's nuclear grade: comparison with other prognostic factors of renal epithelial tumors].
Gimbergues P; Guy L; Costes-Charlet N; Kwiatowsky F; Kemeny JL; Boiteux JP
Prog Urol; 1999 Dec; 9(6):1039-45. PubMed ID: 10658248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Role of nuclear grading in stage I renal cell carcinoma.
Green LK; Ayala AG; Ro JY; Swanson DA; Grignon DJ; Giacco GG; Guinee VF
Urology; 1989 Nov; 34(5):310-5. PubMed ID: 2815458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Significance of nuclear grade and tumor size in Korean patients with chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: a comparison with conventional renal cell carcinoma.
Ku JH; Moon KC; Kwak C; Kim HH
Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 19767221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
