These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11407560)

  • 21. Vowel intelligibility in children with cochlear implants: An acoustic and articulatory study.
    Turgeon C; Trudeau-Fisette P; Fitzpatrick E; Ménard L
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Oct; 101():87-96. PubMed ID: 28964317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of deafness on acoustic characteristics of American English tense/lax vowels in maternal speech to infants.
    Kondaurova MV; Bergeson TR; Dilley LC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1039-49. PubMed ID: 22894224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Does vowel inventory density affect vowel-to-vowel coarticulation?
    Mok PP
    Lang Speech; 2013 Jun; 56(Pt 2):191-209. PubMed ID: 23905280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Saliency of Vowel Features in Neural Responses of Cochlear Implant Users.
    Prévost F; Lehmann A
    Clin EEG Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 49(6):388-397. PubMed ID: 29690785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of masking noise on vowel and sibilant contrasts in normal-hearing speakers and postlingually deafened cochlear implant users.
    Perkell JS; Denny M; Lane H; Guenther F; Matthies ML; Tiede M; Vick J; Zandipour M; Burton E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jan; 121(1):505-18. PubMed ID: 17297804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Acoustic analysis of vowels following glossectomy.
    Whitehill TL; Ciocca V; Chan JC; Samman N
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2006; 20(2-3):135-40. PubMed ID: 16428229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Acoustic analysis of monophthong and diphthong production in acquired severe to profound hearing loss.
    Palethorpe S; Watson CI; Barker R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Aug; 114(2):1055-68. PubMed ID: 12942984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Acoustic analyses and perceptual data on anticipatory labial coarticulation in adults and children.
    Sereno JA; Baum SR; Marean GC; Lieberman P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Feb; 81(2):512-9. PubMed ID: 3558969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Emergence of a vowel system in a young cochlear implant recipient.
    Ertmer DJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Aug; 44(4):803-13. PubMed ID: 11521773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mandarin compound vowels produced by prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants.
    Yang J; Xu L
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Jun; 97():143-149. PubMed ID: 28483225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Stability of memory traces for speech sounds in cochlear implant patients.
    Salo S; Peltola MS; Aaltonen O; Johansson R; Lang AH; Laurikainen E
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2002; 27(3):132-8. PubMed ID: 12498354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Contribution of formant frequency information to vowel perception in steady-state noise by cochlear implant users.
    Sagi E; Svirsky MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Feb; 141(2):1027. PubMed ID: 28253672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dynamic specification of coarticulated German vowels: perceptual and acoustical studies.
    Strange W; Bohn OS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jul; 104(1):488-504. PubMed ID: 9670540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Perception of coarticulatory information in normal speech and dysarthria.
    Tjaden K; Sussman J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Aug; 49(4):888-902. PubMed ID: 16908883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Hearing impairment and vowel production. A comparison between normally hearing, hearing-aided and cochlear implanted Dutch children.
    Verhoeven J; Hide O; De Maeyer S; Gillis S; Gillis S
    J Commun Disord; 2016; 59():24-39. PubMed ID: 26629749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Changes in vowel quality in post-lingually deafened cochlear implant users.
    Langereis MC; Bosman AJ; van Olphen AF; Smoorenburg GF
    Audiology; 1997; 36(5):279-97. PubMed ID: 9305524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An investigation of vowel organization in speakers with severe and profound hearing loss.
    McCaffrey HA; Sussman HM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1994 Aug; 37(4):938-51. PubMed ID: 7967578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Perception and Acoustic Studies of Vowel Intelligibility in Dysphonic Speech.
    Ishikawa K; Nudelman C; Park S; Ketring C
    J Voice; 2021 Jul; 35(4):659.e11-659.e24. PubMed ID: 31952898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Perseveratory coarticulation in the speech of profoundly hearing-impaired and normally hearing children.
    Baum SR; Waldstein RS
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Dec; 34(6):1286-92. PubMed ID: 1787710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.