These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11407774)

  • 1. Measurements of mandibular length: a comparison of articulare vs condylion.
    Haas DW; Martinez DF; Eckert GJ; Diers NR
    Angle Orthod; 2001 Jun; 71(3):210-5. PubMed ID: 11407774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of efficacy of functional appliances on mandibular growth.
    Chen JY; Will LA; Niederman R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):470-6. PubMed ID: 12439474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identification of condylar anatomy affects the evaluation of mandibular growth: guidelines for accurate reporting and research.
    Ghafari J; Jacobsson-Hunt U; Higgins-Barber K; Beideman RW; Shofer FS; Laster LL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Jun; 109(6):645-52. PubMed ID: 8659475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identification of the cephalometric reference point condylion on lateral head films.
    Forsberg CM; Odenrick L
    Angle Orthod; 1989; 59(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 2729665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Linear mandibular measurements: comparison between orthopantomograms and lateral cephalograms.
    Ongkosuwito EM; Dieleman MM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Mulder PG; van Neck JW
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2009 Mar; 46(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 19254052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mandibular growth estimated by four cephalometric measurements.
    Hägg U; Attström K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Aug; 102(2):146-52. PubMed ID: 1636632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cephalometric evaluation of condylar and mandibular growth modification: a review.
    Shen G; Darendeliler MA
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2006 Feb; 9(1):2-9. PubMed ID: 16420269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Discrepancies between centric occlusion and centric relation in orthodontically treated patients.
    Gaither EL; Sadowsky PL; Vlachos CC; Wallace DD
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1997; 12(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 9456615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of Class II treatment by cephalometric regional superpositions versus conventional measurements.
    Efstratiadis S; Baumrind S; Shofer F; Jacobsson-Hunt U; Laster L; Ghafari J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Nov; 128(5):607-18. PubMed ID: 16286208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The anthropomorphic proportions of the face: an evaluation of the response to orthodontic surgical treatment of Angle class III].
    Savastano C; Craca R
    Minerva Stomatol; 1992 Sep; 41(9):373-83. PubMed ID: 1491654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Disc-condyle Relationships during Class II Treatment with the Functional Mandibular Advancer (FMA).
    Kinzinger G; Gülden N; Roth A; Diedrich P
    J Orofac Orthop; 2006 Sep; 67(5):356-75. PubMed ID: 16953355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability of growth prediction with hand-wrist radiographs.
    Verma D; Peltomäki T; Jäger A
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):438-42. PubMed ID: 19395369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variation in repeated mouth-opening measurements in head and neck cancer patients with and without trismus.
    Jager-Wittenaar H; Dijkstra PU; Vissink A; van Oort RP; Roodenburg JL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 38(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 19041226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term comparison of treatment outcome and stability of Class II patients treated with functional appliances versus bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Berger JL; Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; George C; Kaczynski R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):451-64; quiz 516-7. PubMed ID: 15821690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Juvenile chronic arthritis. Dentofacial morphology, growth, mandibular function and orthodontic treatment.
    Kjellberg H
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1995; 109():1-56. PubMed ID: 7660317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The CR-CO discrepancy and its effect on cephalometric measurements.
    Shildkraut M; Wood DP; Hunter WS
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(5):333-42. PubMed ID: 7794320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Porion and condyle as cephalometric landmarks--an error study.
    Adenwalla ST; Kronman JH; Attarzadeh F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1988 Nov; 94(5):411-5. PubMed ID: 3189243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Technical note: Age estimation from mandible by lateral cephalogram: a preliminary study.
    Rai B; Krishan K; Kaur J; Anand SC
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2008 Jun; 26(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 22689354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The relation between pogonion advancement and posterior maxillary impaction.
    Jamilian A; Showkatbakhsh A; Gholami D; Kamali Z
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 May; 20(3):841-3. PubMed ID: 19349906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of differential growth and orthodontic treatment outcome by regional cephalometric superpositions.
    Efstratiadis SS; Cohen G; Ghafari J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Jun; 69(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 10371427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.