These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Balancing the right of the mentally retarded to obtain a therapeutic sterilization against the potential for abuse. Irvine AC Law Psychol Rev; 1988; 12():95-122. PubMed ID: 11660733 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. H.L. v. Matheson and the right of minors to seek abortions. Wolff MH; Hawn RH Calif West Law Rev; 1982; 19(1):74-106. PubMed ID: 11658632 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Voluntary sterilization for persons with mental disabilities: the need for legislation. Burnett BA Syracuse Law Rev; 1981; 32(4):913-55. PubMed ID: 11658516 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Ruby v. Massey: sterilization of the mentally retarded. Diehl JE Cap Univ Law Rev; 1979; 9(1):191-206. PubMed ID: 11665269 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Unemancipated minors' rights of access to contraceptives without parental consent or notice--the squeal rule and beyond. Best M Oklahoma City Univ Law Rev; 1983; 8(2):219-50. PubMed ID: 11658756 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Utah and publicly funded contraceptive services: the struggle to prevent minors from sponging off the government. Chitwood M J Contemp Law; 1987; 13(2):277-300. PubMed ID: 11658998 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Contraceptive sterilization: the need for state regulation. Motley CE Gold Gate Law Rev; 1975; 6(1):79-99. PubMed ID: 11661332 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Teens left with many options despite 'squeal rule'. Ob Gyn News; 1983 Jul 1-14; 18(13):36. PubMed ID: 11658369 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A considered approach to sterilization of mentally retarded youth. Perrin JC Am J Dis Child; 1976 Mar; 130(3):288-90. PubMed ID: 12085870 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Bill requires express written consent, not "passive consent. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1995 Jul; 10(7):6. PubMed ID: 11654275 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A parent's right to seek sterilization for an incompetent minor. Barron EJ Forum; 1981; 16(5):1081-101. PubMed ID: 11649450 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Law would remove ability of institutional review boards to waive written consent. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1996 Aug; 11(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 11654439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Massachusetts parental/judicial consent law for minors' abortions: perspectives on the past, present, and future. Joseph MA New Engl Law Rev; 1992; 26(3):1051-99. PubMed ID: 11659665 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Sexual sterilization--constitutional validity of involuntary sterilization and consent determinative of voluntariness. Baker JD Miss Law Rev; 1975; 40(3):509-26. PubMed ID: 11664500 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Sterilization abuse: a proposed regulatory scheme. Kelly ME De Paul Law Rev; 1979; 28(3):731-68. PubMed ID: 11661936 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. S.J. Res. 110: Human Life Federalism Amendment. Hatch OG Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1981 Sep; 127(131):S10194-8. PubMed ID: 11658572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A decade of cementing the mosaic of Roe v. Wade: is the composite a message to leave abortion alone? Kudner KE Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1984; 15(2):681-753. PubMed ID: 11649780 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Sterilization of the developmentally disabled: shedding some myth-conceptions. Ross DH Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1981; 9(4):599-643. PubMed ID: 11658741 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]