123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11408896)
1. Further concerns about the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development guidelines for interpretation of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring.
Bernardes J; Ayres-de-Campos D; Costa-Pereira A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jun; 184(7):1587-8. PubMed ID: 11408896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of visual analyses of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings according to the new national institute of child health and human development guidelines with computer analyses by an automated fetal heart rate monitoring system.
Devoe L; Golde S; Kilman Y; Morton D; Shea K; Waller J
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Aug; 183(2):361-6. PubMed ID: 10942470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of fetal heart-rate variability interpretation by obstetricians using the criteria of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development compared with computer-aided interpretation.
Tongsong T; Iamthongin A; Wanapirak C; Piyamongkol W; Sirichotiyakul S; Boonyanurak P; Tatiyapornkul T; Neelasri C
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2005 Feb; 31(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 15669996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: research guidelines for interpretation. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Research Planning Workshop.
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Dec; 177(6):1385-90. PubMed ID: 9423739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, The Consensus Development Conference on Antenatal Diagnosis. Part III: predictors of fetal distress.
Pediatr Ann; 1980 Jul; 9(7):276-8. PubMed ID: 7413282
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A review of the 2008 NICHD Research Planning Workshop: recommendations for fetal heart rate terminology and interpretation.
Hankins GD; Miller DA
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 54(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 21278495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How to read fetal heart rate tracings in labor: a comparison between ACOG and NICE guidelines.
Buscicchio G; Gentilucci L; Martorana R; Martino C; Tranquilli AL
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Dec; 25(12):2797-8. PubMed ID: 22881995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Documentation improvements following multidisciplinary educational program on electronic fetal heart rate tracings.
Vadnais MA; Golen TH
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 May; 24(5):741-4. PubMed ID: 21067288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Antenatal diagnosis. Sponsored by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, March 5-7, 1979.
Natl Inst Health Consens Dev Conf Summ; 1979; 2():11-5. PubMed ID: 398960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Why are we using electronic fetal monitoring?
Kripke CC
Am Fam Physician; 1999 May; 59(9):2416, 2421-2. PubMed ID: 10323350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Developing a tool to appraise fetal monitoring guidelines for women at low obstetric risk.
Hindley C; Hinsliff SW; Thomson AM
J Adv Nurs; 2005 Nov; 52(3):307-14. PubMed ID: 16194184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [A new monitoring method for safer child delivery. Lower number of metabolic acidosis cases with fetal ECG and cardiotocography].
Hagberg H; Amer-Wåhlin I; Herbst A; Lilja H; Norén H; Olofsson P; Marsál K
Lakartidningen; 2004 Nov; 101(48):3875-6, 3878, 3880-1. PubMed ID: 15631221
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. On NICHD workshops I (1997) and II (2008) on electronic fetal monitoring.
Harvey CJ; Witcher PS
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2009; 38(3):255-7. PubMed ID: 19538611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Development of guidelines for medical procedures; relationship between goal, method and effect].
Kaasenbrood AJ; Klazinga NS
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1994 Jul; 138(31):1560-4. PubMed ID: 8072567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Electronic solutions to implementing lipid guidelines.
Fox GN
J Fam Pract; 2002 Oct; 51(10):872-4. PubMed ID: 12401160
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Metabolic syndrome scientific statement by the American Heart Association and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
Grundy SM
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol; 2005 Nov; 25(11):2243-4. PubMed ID: 16258150
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: a story of survival.
Parer JT
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2003 Sep; 58(9):561-3. PubMed ID: 12972834
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. What are the problems with the NIH guidelines? What are the solutions?
Weinberger M
Pediatr Pulmonol; 2001; Suppl 23():13-5. PubMed ID: 11886115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Unselected low-risk pregnancies and the effect of continuous intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring on umbilical blood gases and cerebral palsy.
Sameshima H; Ikenoue T; Ikeda T; Kamitomo M; Ibara S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan; 190(1):118-23. PubMed ID: 14749646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and the prevention of perinatal brain injury.
Blander CL
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Dec; 108(6):1554; author reply 1554. PubMed ID: 17138796
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
