These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11409595)
1. Group-based measurement strategies in exposure assessment explored by bootstrapping. Hoozemans MJ; Burdorf A; van der Beek AJ; Frings-Dresen MH; Mathiassen SE Scand J Work Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 27(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 11409595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Within-day variability of magnetic fields among electric utility workers: consequences for measurement strategies. van der Woord MP; Kromhout H; Barregård L; Jonsson P Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1999; 60(6):713-9. PubMed ID: 10635537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Within-day variability of magnetic fields among electric utility workers: consequences for measurement strategies. van der Woord MP; Kromhout H; Barregård L; Jonsson P AIHAJ; 2000; 61(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 10772612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sources of variance in exposure to nonneutral trunk postures in varying work situations. van der Beek AJ; Kuiper JI; Dawson M; Burdorf A; Bongers PM; Frings-Dresen MH Scand J Work Environ Health; 1995 Jun; 21(3):215-22. PubMed ID: 7481609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A lognormal distribution-based exposure assessment method for unbalanced data. Lyles RH; Kupper LL; Rappaport SM Ann Occup Hyg; 1997 Jan; 41(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 9072951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A meta-analytic approach for characterizing the within-worker and between-worker sources of variation in occupational exposure. Symanski E; Maberti S; Chan W Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Jun; 50(4):343-57. PubMed ID: 16513810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy and precision of variance components in occupational posture recordings: a simulation study of different data collection strategies. Liv P; Mathiassen SE; Svendsen SW BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Jun; 12():58. PubMed ID: 22533627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliable exposure assessment strategies for physical ergonomics stressors in construction and other non-routinized work. Paquet V; Punnett L; Woskie S; Buchholz B Ergonomics; 2005 Jul; 48(9):1200-19. PubMed ID: 16251156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimizing occupational exposure measurement strategies when estimating the log-scale arithmetic mean value--an example from the reinforced plastics industry. Lampa EG; Nilsson L; Liljelind IE; Bergdahl IA Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Jun; 50(4):371-7. PubMed ID: 16467435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The variability of exposure over time: a prospective longitudinal study. Peretz C; Goldberg P; Kahan E; Grady S; Goren A Ann Occup Hyg; 1997 Aug; 41(4):485-500. PubMed ID: 9284649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sampling strategies for occupational exposure assessment under generalized linear model. Chen CC; Chuang CL; Wu KY; Chan CC Ann Occup Hyg; 2009 Jul; 53(5):509-21. PubMed ID: 19460758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Short daily exposure to hand-arm vibrations in Swedish car mechanics. Barregård L Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2003 Jan; 18(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 12650547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comprehensive dose reconstruction methodology for former rocketdyne/atomics international radiation workers. Boice JD; Leggett RW; Ellis ED; Wallace PW; Mumma M; Cohen SS; Brill AB; Chadda B; Boecker BB; Yoder RC; Eckerman KF Health Phys; 2006 May; 90(5):409-30. PubMed ID: 16607174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Low-back and shoulder complaints among workers with pushing and pulling tasks. Hoozemans MJ; van der Beek AJ; Fring-Dresen MH; van der Woude LH; van Dijk FJ Scand J Work Environ Health; 2002 Oct; 28(5):293-303. PubMed ID: 12432982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sources of variance in exposure to postural load on the back in occupational groups. Burdorf A Scand J Work Environ Health; 1992 Dec; 18(6):361-7. PubMed ID: 1485161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Heterogeneity in sources of exposure variability among groups of workers exposed to inorganic mercury. Symanski E; Sällsten G; Chan W; Barregård L Ann Occup Hyg; 2001 Nov; 45(8):677-87. PubMed ID: 11718663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cross-classified occupational exposure data. Jones RM; Burstyn I J Occup Environ Hyg; 2016 Sep; 13(9):668-74. PubMed ID: 27029937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Variability in endotoxin exposure levels and consequences for exposure assessment. Spaan S; Schinkel J; Wouters IM; Preller L; Tielemans E; Nij ET; Heederik D Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Jul; 52(5):303-16. PubMed ID: 18515847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bias and power in group-based epidemiologic studies of low-back pain exposure and outcome--effects of study size and exposure measurement efforts. Coenen P; Mathiassen SE; Kingma I; Boot CR; Bongers PM; van Dieën JH Ann Occup Hyg; 2015 May; 59(4):439-54. PubMed ID: 25433002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Healthy worker survivor analysis in an occupational cohort study of Dutch agricultural workers. Spierenburg EA; Smit LA; Heederik D; Robbe P; Hylkema MN; Wouters IM Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 2015 Nov; 88(8):1165-73. PubMed ID: 25795169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]