These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11409765)

  • 21. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Binaural advantage for younger and older adults with normal hearing.
    Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Apr; 51(2):539-56. PubMed ID: 18367695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Electrophysiologic and behavioral auditory findings in multiple sclerosis.
    Musiek FE; Gollegly KM; Kibbe KS; Reeves AG
    Am J Otol; 1989 Sep; 10(5):343-50. PubMed ID: 2817103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Development of an adaptive low-pass filtered speech test for the identification of auditory processing disorders.
    O'Beirne GA; McGaffin AJ; Rickard NA
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Jun; 76(6):777-82. PubMed ID: 22402015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Perceptual characterization of children with auditory neuropathy.
    Rance G; McKay C; Grayden D
    Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):34-46. PubMed ID: 14770016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Auditory and corporal laterality, logoaudiometry, and monaural hearing aid gain].
    Benavides M; Peñaloza-López YR; de la Sancha-Jiménez S; García Pedroza F; Gudiño PK
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2007 Dec; 58(10):458-63. PubMed ID: 18082075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Central auditory processing in elderly with mild cognitive impairment.
    Rahman TT; Mohamed ST; Albanouby MH; Bekhet HF
    Geriatr Gerontol Int; 2011 Jul; 11(3):304-8. PubMed ID: 21272179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of the Words with Ipsilateral Competition test.
    Stouffer JL
    J Otolaryngol; 1990 Feb; 19(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 2313785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Auditory evoked potentials in the detection of interaural intensity differences in children and adults.
    Wambacq IJ; Koehnke J; Shea-Miller KJ; Besing J; Toth V; Abubakr A
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):320-31. PubMed ID: 17485981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effects of masking on the activation of auditory-associated cortex during speech listening in white noise.
    Hwang JH; Wu CW; Chen JH; Liu TC
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Sep; 126(9):916-20. PubMed ID: 16864487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [The application of the same frequency tone masking test in forensic identification].
    Liu JH; Xu JT; Li YF
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 May; 21(2):81-3. PubMed ID: 15931742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessment of children with suspected auditory processing disorder: a factor analysis study.
    Ahmmed AU; Ahmmed AA; Bath JR; Ferguson MA; Plack CJ; Moore DR
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):295-305. PubMed ID: 24496289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Brain stem and cortical mechanisms underlying the binaural masking level difference in humans: an auditory steady-state response study.
    Wong WY; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 14770018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [The use of masking level differences in evaluating central auditory processing: the norms for the normal hearing subjects].
    Güven AG; Mutlu M
    Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg; 2003 Mar; 10(3):93-7. PubMed ID: 12738916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Recognition of digits in different types of noise by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Smits C; Houtgast T
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Mar; 46(3):134-44. PubMed ID: 17365067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Brain lesions, central masking, and dichotic speech perception.
    Harris J
    Brain Lang; 1994 Jan; 46(1):96-108. PubMed ID: 8131046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Identification of binaural integration deficits in children with the Competing Words Subtest: standard score versus interaural asymmetry.
    Moncrieff DW
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Apr; 45(4):200-7; discussion 207-10. PubMed ID: 16684701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Diagnosis of central hearing disorders in childhood].
    Nickisch A
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1988 Jun; 67(6):312-5. PubMed ID: 3405032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.