These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11409858)

  • 21. Envelope following responses elicited by English sentences.
    Choi JM; Purcell DW; Coyne JA; Aiken SJ
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):637-50. PubMed ID: 23575462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of channel-to-electrode mappings on speech reception with the ineraid cochlear implant.
    Rabinowitz WM; Eddington DK
    Ear Hear; 1995 Oct; 16(5):450-8. PubMed ID: 8654900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Speech perception studies using a multichannel electrotactile speech processor, residual hearing, and lipreading.
    Cowan RS; Alcantara JI; Whitford LA; Blamey PJ; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jun; 85(6):2593-607. PubMed ID: 2526169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of Context Type on Lipreading and Listening Performance and Implications for Sentence Processing.
    Spehar B; Goebel S; Tye-Murray N
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Jun; 58(3):1093-102. PubMed ID: 25863923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Experiments on Auditory-Visual Perception of Sentences by Users of Unilateral, Bimodal, and Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Dorman MF; Liss J; Wang S; Berisha V; Ludwig C; Natale SC
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Dec; 59(6):1505-1519. PubMed ID: 27960006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Trimodal speech perception: how residual acoustic hearing supplements cochlear-implant consonant recognition in the presence of visual cues.
    Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JG
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e99-112. PubMed ID: 25514796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Automatic speech recognition to aid the hearing impaired: prospects for the automatic generation of cued speech.
    Uchanski RM; Delhorne LA; Dix AK; Braida LD; Reed CM; Durlach NI
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1994; 31(1):20-41. PubMed ID: 8035358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Speech perception using combinations of auditory, visual, and tactile information.
    Blamey PJ; Cowan RS; Alcantara JI; Whitford LA; Clark GM
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1989; 26(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 2521904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Envelope-onset asynchrony as a cue to voicing in initial english consonants.
    Yuan H; Reed CM; Durlach NI
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Nov; 116(5):3156-67. PubMed ID: 15603161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Open-set word identification by an adult with profound hearing impairment: integration of touch, aided hearing, and speechreading.
    Lynch MP; Eilers RE; Pero PJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Apr; 35(2):443-9. PubMed ID: 1533432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Multisensory narrative tracking by a profoundly deaf subject using an electrocutaneous vocoder and a vibrotactile aid.
    Lynch MP; Eilers RE; Oller DK; Urbano RC; Pero PJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Jun; 32(2):331-8. PubMed ID: 2739385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Voice fundamental frequency as an auditory supplement to the speechreading of sentences.
    Boothroyd A; Hnath-Chisolm T; Hanin L; Kishon-Rabin L
    Ear Hear; 1988 Dec; 9(6):306-12. PubMed ID: 2975613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Vowel and consonant recognition of cochlear implant patients using formant-estimating speech processors.
    Blamey PJ; Dowell RC; Brown AM; Clark GM; Seligman PM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jul; 82(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 3624640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Development of speechreading supplements based on automatic speech recognition.
    Duchnowski P; Lum DS; Krause JC; Sexton MG; Bratakos MS; Braida LD
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 Apr; 47(4):487-96. PubMed ID: 10763294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Visual phonemic ambiguity and speechreading.
    Lidestam B; Beskow J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Aug; 49(4):835-47. PubMed ID: 16908878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Teaching Children With Hearing Loss to Recognize Speech: Gains Made With Computer-Based Auditory and/or Speechreading Training.
    Tye-Murray N; Spehar B; Sommers M; Mauzé E; Barcroft J; Grantham H
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(1):181-191. PubMed ID: 34225318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The use of tactile supplements in lipreading Swedish and English: a single-subject study.
    Plant G; Gnosspelius J; Levitt H
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Feb; 43(1):172-83. PubMed ID: 10668660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Visual Cues Contribute Differentially to Audiovisual Perception of Consonants and Vowels in Improving Recognition and Reducing Cognitive Demands in Listeners With Hearing Impairment Using Hearing Aids.
    Moradi S; Lidestam B; Danielsson H; Ng EHN; Rönnberg J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 60(9):2687-2703. PubMed ID: 28651255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Top-Down Processes in Simulated Electric-Acoustic Hearing: The Effect of Linguistic Context on Bimodal Benefit for Temporally Interrupted Speech.
    Oh SH; Donaldson GS; Kong YY
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):582-92. PubMed ID: 27007220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Perception of sentences, words, and speech features by profoundly hearing-impaired children using a multichannel electrotactile speech processor.
    Cowan RS; Blamey PJ; Galvin KL; Sarant JZ; Alcántara JI; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Sep; 88(3):1374-84. PubMed ID: 2146297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.