126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11411145)
1. Exposure assessment to mercury vapor in chloralkali industry.
Mniszek W
Environ Monit Assess; 2001 May; 68(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 11411145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The risk of occupational exposure to mercury vapor in some public dental clinics of Baghdad city, Iraq.
Al-Zubaidi ES; Rabee AM
Inhal Toxicol; 2017 Aug; 29(9):397-403. PubMed ID: 29043874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Occupational exposure to mercury vapor in a compact fluorescent lamp factory: Evaluation of personal, ambient air, and biological monitoring.
Darvishi E; Assari MJ; Farhadian M; Chavoshi E; Ehsani HR
Toxicol Ind Health; 2019 Apr; 35(4):304-313. PubMed ID: 30917767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Validation of measurement methods and estimation of uncertainty of measurement of chemical agents in the air at workstations].
Dobecki M
Med Pr; 2012; 63(6):723-32. PubMed ID: 23394013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hair can be a good biomarker of occupational exposure to mercury vapor: simulated experiments and field data analysis.
Li P; Feng X; Qiu G; Wan Q
Sci Total Environ; 2011 Sep; 409(20):4484-8. PubMed ID: 21784505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analytical performance criteria: an improved gold amalgam method for measurement of mercury vapor in the workplace.
Takaya M; Kohyama N
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Jul; 1(7):D75-9. PubMed ID: 15238320
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Occupational exposures to styrene vapor in a manufacturing plant for fiber-reinforced composite wind turbine blades.
Hammond D; Garcia A; Feng HA
Ann Occup Hyg; 2011 Jul; 55(6):591-600. PubMed ID: 21597049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Color vision impairment in workers exposed to mercury vapor].
Jedrejko M; Skoczyńska A
Med Pr; 2011; 62(3):227-35. PubMed ID: 21870413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Exposure of UK industrial plumbers to asbestos, Part I: Monitoring of exposure using personal passive samplers.
Burdett G; Bard D
Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Mar; 51(2):121-30. PubMed ID: 17189281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Human co-exposure to mercury vapor and methylmercury in artisanal mercury mining areas, Guizhou, China.
Li P; Feng X; Shang L; Qiu G; Meng B; Zhang H; Guo Y; Liang P
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2011 Mar; 74(3):473-9. PubMed ID: 21056470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mercury vapor determination in hospitals.
Prokopowicz A; Mniszek W
Environ Monit Assess; 2005 May; 104(1-3):147-54. PubMed ID: 15931983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reconstruction of occupational mercury exposures at a chloralkali plant.
Williams PL; Frumkin H; Pierce ML; Manning CC; Elon L; Sanders AG
Occup Environ Med; 2001 Feb; 58(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 11160985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Predictive models for the assessment of occupational exposure to chemicals: a new challenge for employers].
Gromiec JP; Kupczewska-Dobecka M; Jankowska A; Czerczak S
Med Pr; 2013; 64(5):699-716. PubMed ID: 24502133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Statistical study of the correlation between mercury exposure (TWA) and urinary mercury concentrations in chloralkali workers.
Mattiussi R; Armeli G; Bareggi V
Am J Ind Med; 1982; 3(3):335-9. PubMed ID: 7171090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Variability in airborne and biological measures of exposure to mercury in the chloralkali industry: implications for epidemiologic studies.
Symanski E; Sällsten G; Barregård L
Environ Health Perspect; 2000 Jun; 108(6):569-73. PubMed ID: 10856033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of four personal sampling methods for the determination of mercury vapor.
McCammon CS; Edwards SL; Hull RD; Woodfin WJ
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1980 Jul; 41(7):528-31. PubMed ID: 7415977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the use of low flow passive sampling technique in offset printing plants.
Hautamäki M; Kalliokoski P; Hyttinen M; Pasanen P; Laitinen J; Kangas J; Luukkonen R; Batterman S
Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2006; 19(4):228-34. PubMed ID: 17402218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of worker's location, orientation, and activity on exposure.
Lee E; Feigley CE; Khan J; Hussey JR
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Aug; 4(8):572-82. PubMed ID: 17562469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Identifying occupational and nonoccupational exposure to mercury in dental personnel.
Shirkhanloo H; Fallah Mehrjerdi MA; Hassani H
Arch Environ Occup Health; 2017 Mar; 72(2):63-69. PubMed ID: 25257992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Evaluation of exposure to metallic mercury following the measurement of mercury vapor concentration in air of the working zone where acetic aldehyde and chlorine are produced].
Braszczyńska Z; Marek K; Szaciłło H; Król B; Jedrzejczak A
Med Pr; 1994; 45(6):487-93. PubMed ID: 7854105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
