These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11411439)

  • 1. The converse inequality argument against tests of statistical significance.
    Markus KA
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Jun; 6(2):147-60. PubMed ID: 11411439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of argument structure on judgements of argument strength, function, and adequacy.
    Ricco RB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Apr; 61(4):641-64. PubMed ID: 18938280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Null hypothesis significance testing: a review of an old and continuing controversy.
    Nickerson RS
    Psychol Methods; 2000 Jun; 5(2):241-301. PubMed ID: 10937333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Evaluation of arguments in research reports].
    Botes A
    Curationis; 1999 Jun; 22(2):10-9. PubMed ID: 11040614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modeling the effects of argument length and validity on inductive and deductive reasoning.
    Rotello CM; Heit E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1317-30. PubMed ID: 19686024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validating interpretive arguments for licensure and certification examinations.
    Kane MT
    Eval Health Prof; 1994 Jun; 17(2):133-59; discussion 236-41. PubMed ID: 10134545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A sensible formulation of the significance test.
    Jones LV; Tukey JW
    Psychol Methods; 2000 Dec; 5(4):411-4. PubMed ID: 11194204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Popperian epidemiology and the logic of bi-conditional modus tollens arguments for refutational analysis of randomised controlled trials.
    Koch E; Otarola A; Romero T; Kirschbaum A; Ortuzar E
    Med Hypotheses; 2006; 67(4):980-8. PubMed ID: 16730919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relation between income inequality and mortality: empirical demonstration.
    Wolfson M; Kaplan G; Lynch J; Ross N; Backlund E
    BMJ; 1999 Oct; 319(7215):953-5. PubMed ID: 10514157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Two kinds of reasoning.
    Rips LJ
    Psychol Sci; 2001 Mar; 12(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 11340921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The macrostructure of informal arguments: a proposed model and analysis.
    Ricco RB
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Aug; 56(6):1021-51. PubMed ID: 12881169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Why test animals to treat humans? On the validity of animal models.
    Shelley C
    Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2010 Sep; 41(3):292-9. PubMed ID: 20934650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A contemporary approach to validity arguments: a practical guide to Kane's framework.
    Cook DA; Brydges R; Ginsburg S; Hatala R
    Med Educ; 2015 Jun; 49(6):560-75. PubMed ID: 25989405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robust tests of equivalence for k independent groups.
    Koh A; Cribbie R
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Nov; 66(3):426-34. PubMed ID: 23043500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The proof of the pudding: an illustration of the relative strengths of null hypothesis, meta-analysis, and Bayesian analysis.
    Howard GS; Maxwell SE; Fleming KJ
    Psychol Methods; 2000 Sep; 5(3):315-32. PubMed ID: 11004870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Incidental findings of uncertain significance: To know or not to know--that is not the question.
    Hofmann B
    BMC Med Ethics; 2016 Feb; 17():13. PubMed ID: 26873084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The logic of the medical research article.
    Velanovich V
    Theor Med; 1993 Sep; 14(3):257-65. PubMed ID: 8259532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Judgments of grammaticality of Japanese simple sentences involving two arguments in a whole-part relation: a further examination of Chomsky's principle of Full Interpretation.
    Nagata H
    Percept Mot Skills; 2006 Jun; 102(3):855-70. PubMed ID: 16916165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Statistical results: which method of presentation to chose?].
    Verdoux H; Salamon R
    Encephale; 1997; 23(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 9172963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Slippery slope arguments imply opposition to change.
    Haigh M; Wood JS; Stewart AJ
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Jul; 44(5):819-36. PubMed ID: 26886759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.