These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11411439)
21. Scientific basis of the OCRA method for risk assessment of biomechanical overload of upper limb, as preferred method in ISO standards on biomechanical risk factors. Colombini D; Occhipinti E Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jul; 44(4):436-438. PubMed ID: 29961081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Transparency in Biomedical Research: An Argument Against Tests of Statistical Significance. Twa MD Optom Vis Sci; 2016 May; 93(5):457-8. PubMed ID: 27101393 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Validity: on meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Downing SM Med Educ; 2003 Sep; 37(9):830-7. PubMed ID: 14506816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Taking precautionary concerns seriously: a defense of a misused anti-abortion argument. Friberg-Fernros H J Med Philos; 2014 Jun; 39(3):228-47. PubMed ID: 24793317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Emotional logic development profiles - validating the benefits and safety of emotional logic training. Zahra D; Langsford M; Griffiths T Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract; 2016 Sep; 20(3):141-5. PubMed ID: 27308963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. "Pregnancy is not a disease": conscientious refusal and the argument from concepts. Brudney D Hastings Cent Rep; 2014 Sep; 44(5):43-9. PubMed ID: 25231661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Selling yourself: Titmuss's argument against a market in blood. Archard D J Ethics; 2002; 6(1):87-103. PubMed ID: 14686328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Letting the Gini out of the bottle? Challenges facing the relative income hypothesis. Ellison GT Soc Sci Med; 2002 Feb; 54(4):561-76. PubMed ID: 11858212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Should we use one-sided or two-sided P values in tests of significance? Ludbrook J Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2013 Jun; 40(6):357-61. PubMed ID: 23551169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Development of logical reasoning: children's ability to verbally explain the nature of the distinction between logical and nonlogical forms of argument. Morris AK Dev Psychol; 2000 Nov; 36(6):741-58. PubMed ID: 11081698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Is health inequality across individuals of moral concern? Asada Y Health Care Anal; 2006 Mar; 14(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 17137017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evidence and scientific research. Goodman SN; Royall R Am J Public Health; 1988 Dec; 78(12):1568-74. PubMed ID: 3189634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The analysis of repeated measures designs: a review. Keselman HJ; Algina J; Kowalchuk RK Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2001 May; 54(Pt 1):1-20. PubMed ID: 11393894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Research on cultural and socioeconomic factors in criminal violence. Messner SF Psychiatr Clin North Am; 1988 Dec; 11(4):511-25. PubMed ID: 3062590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Lessons on measuring construct validity: a commentary on Delis, Jacobson, Bondi, Hamilton, And Salmon. Larrabee GJ J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2003 Sep; 9(6):947-53. PubMed ID: 14632253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The ethics and science of placebo-controlled trials: assay sensitivity and the Duhem-Quine thesis. Anderson JA J Med Philos; 2006 Feb; 31(1):65-81. PubMed ID: 16464770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Is the partial credit model a Rasch model? Massof RW J Appl Meas; 2012; 13(2):114-31. PubMed ID: 22805357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Random assignment of available cases: bootstrap standard errors and confidence intervals. Lunneborg CE Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):402-12. PubMed ID: 11778680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Revisiting the argument from fetal potential. Manninen BA Philos Ethics Humanit Med; 2007 May; 2():7. PubMed ID: 17509146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Do incompatible arguments cause extensive processing in the evaluation of arguments? The role of congruence between argument compatibility and argument quality. Liu CH; Lee HW; Huang PS; Chen HC; Sommers S Br J Psychol; 2016 Feb; 107(1):179-98. PubMed ID: 25966342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]