These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

398 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11413082)

  • 41. Long-term clinical outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided treatment in patients with angiographically equivocal left main coronary artery stenosis.
    Hamilos M; Muller O; Cuisset T; Ntalianis A; Chlouverakis G; Sarno G; Nelis O; Bartunek J; Vanderheyden M; Wyffels E; Barbato E; Heyndrickx GR; Wijns W; De Bruyne B
    Circulation; 2009 Oct; 120(15):1505-12. PubMed ID: 19786633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Diagnostic performance of quantitative coronary computed tomography angiography and quantitative coronary angiography to predict hemodynamic significance of intermediate-grade stenoses.
    Ghekiere O; Dewilde W; Bellekens M; Hoa D; Couvreur T; Djekic J; Coolen T; Mancini I; Vanhoenacker PK; Dendale P; Nchimi A
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Dec; 31(8):1651-61. PubMed ID: 26323355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Long-term clinical outcomes after deferral of percutaneous coronary intervention of intermediate coronary stenoses based on coronary pressure-derived fractional flow reserve.
    Misaka T; Kunii H; Mizukami H; Sakamoto N; Nakazato K; Takeishi Y
    J Cardiol; 2011 Jul; 58(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 21620679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Impact of fractional flow reserve measurement on the clinical management of patients with coronary artery disease evaluated with noninvasive stress tests prior to cardiac catheterization.
    Lachance P; Déry JP; Rodés-Cabau J; Potvin JM; Barbeau G; Bertrand OF; Gleeton O; Larose E; Nguyen CM; Noël B; Proulx G; Roy L; De Larochellière R
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2008; 9(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 18928947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Assessment of coronary artery stenosis during PTCA by measurement of the trans-stenotic pressure gradient. Comparison with quantitative coronary angiography.
    Lamm C; Albertsson P; Dohnal M; Tylén U; Emanuelsson H
    Eur Heart J; 1995 Oct; 16(10):1367-74. PubMed ID: 8746905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Safety of FFR-based treatment strategies: the Munich experience.
    Rieber J; Jung P; Schiele TM; Koenig A; Erhard I; Segmiller T; Ebel S; Theisen K; Siebert U; Klauss V
    Z Kardiol; 2002; 91 Suppl 3():115-9. PubMed ID: 12641025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Deferral vs. performance of percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally non-significant coronary stenosis: 15-year follow-up of the DEFER trial.
    Zimmermann FM; Ferrara A; Johnson NP; van Nunen LX; Escaned J; Albertsson P; Erbel R; Legrand V; Gwon HC; Remkes WS; Stella PR; van Schaardenburgh P; Bech GJ; De Bruyne B; Pijls NH
    Eur Heart J; 2015 Dec; 36(45):3182-8. PubMed ID: 26400825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The influence of the presence of collaterals on restenoses after PTCA.
    Probst P; Baumgartner C; Gottsauner-Wolf M
    Clin Cardiol; 1991 Oct; 14(10):803-7. PubMed ID: 1954688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Diagnostic performance of transluminal attenuation gradient and fractional flow reserve by coronary computed tomographic angiography (FFR(CT)) compared to invasive FFR: a sub-group analysis from the DISCOVER-FLOW and DeFACTO studies.
    Nakanishi R; Matsumoto S; Alani A; Li D; Kitslaar PH; Broersen A; Koo BK; Min JK; Budoff MJ
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Aug; 31(6):1251-9. PubMed ID: 25904402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Long-term outcome after deferral of revascularization in patients with intermediate coronary stenosis and gray-zone fractional flow reserve.
    Shiono Y; Kubo T; Tanaka A; Ino Y; Yamaguchi T; Tanimoto T; Yamano T; Matsuo Y; Nishiguchi T; Teraguchi I; Ota S; Ozaki Y; Orii M; Shimamura K; Kitabata H; Hirata K; Imanishi T; Akasaka T
    Circ J; 2015; 79(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 25410812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Clinical significance of fractional flow reserve for evaluation of functional lesion severity in stent restenosis and native coronary arteries.
    Krüger S; Koch KC; Kaumanns I; Merx MW; Hanrath P; Hoffmann R
    Chest; 2005 Sep; 128(3):1645-9. PubMed ID: 16162770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in intermediate coronary artery disease: fractional flow reserve-guided versus intravascular ultrasound-guided.
    Nam CW; Yoon HJ; Cho YK; Park HS; Kim H; Hur SH; Kim YN; Chung IS; Koo BK; Tahk SJ; Fearon WF; Kim KB
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Aug; 3(8):812-7. PubMed ID: 20723852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparison of Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT with fractional flow reserve in patients with intermediate coronary artery stenoses.
    Hacker M; Rieber J; Schmid R; Lafougere C; Tausig A; Theisen K; Klaus V; Tiling R
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2005; 12(6):645-54. PubMed ID: 16344226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. On the inappropriateness of noninvasive multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography to trigger coronary revascularization: a comparison with invasive angiography.
    Sarno G; Decraemer I; Vanhoenacker PK; De Bruyne B; Hamilos M; Cuisset T; Wyffels E; Bartunek J; Heyndrickx GR; Wijns W
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Jun; 2(6):550-7. PubMed ID: 19539260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Usefulness of fractional flow reserve for risk stratification of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and an intermediate stenosis.
    Chamuleau SA; Meuwissen M; Koch KT; van Eck-Smit BL; Tio RA; Tijssen JG; Piek JJ
    Am J Cardiol; 2002 Feb; 89(4):377-80. PubMed ID: 11835914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Randomized Comparison of FFR-Guided and Angiography-Guided Provisional Stenting of True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: The DKCRUSH-VI Trial (Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions VI).
    Chen SL; Ye F; Zhang JJ; Xu T; Tian NL; Liu ZZ; Lin S; Shan SJ; Ge Z; You W; Liu YQ; Qian XS; Li F; Yang S; Kwan TW; Xu B; Stone GW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Apr; 8(4):536-46. PubMed ID: 25819187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Long-term clinical outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease.
    Berger A; Botman KJ; MacCarthy PA; Wijns W; Bartunek J; Heyndrickx GR; Pijls NH; De Bruyne B
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Aug; 46(3):438-42. PubMed ID: 16053955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Randomized trial of late elective angioplasty versus conservative management for patients with residual stenoses after thrombolytic treatment of myocardial infarction. Treatment of Post-Thrombolytic Stenoses (TOPS) Study Group.
    Ellis SG; Mooney MR; George BS; da Silva EE; Talley JD; Flanagan WH; Topol EJ
    Circulation; 1992 Nov; 86(5):1400-6. PubMed ID: 1423952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Diagnostic performance of pressure drop coefficient in relation to fractional flow reserve and coronary flow reserve.
    Kolli KK; Arif I; Peelukhana SV; Succop P; Back LH; Helmy TA; Leesar MA; Effat MA; Banerjee RK
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2014 May; 26(5):188-95. PubMed ID: 24791716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Differences of regional coronary flow reserve assessed by adenosine thallium-201 scintigraphy early and six months after successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or stent implantation.
    Versaci F; Tomai F; Nudi F; Gaspardone A; De Fazio A; Ciavolella M; Crea F; Mango L; Chiariello L; Gioffrè PA
    Am J Cardiol; 1996 Nov; 78(10):1097-102. PubMed ID: 8914870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.