These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11414138)
21. Rhythm and "good endings": effects of temporal structure on tonality judgments. Boltz M Percept Psychophys; 1989 Jul; 46(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 2755767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Impression of smoothness of a sound stream in relation to legato in musical performance. Kuwano S; Namba S; Yamasaki T; Nishiyama K Percept Psychophys; 1994 Aug; 56(2):173-82. PubMed ID: 7971118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Temporal expectancies affect accuracy in standard-comparison judgments of duration, but neither pitch height, nor timbre, nor loudness. Prince JB; Sopp M J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 May; 45(5):585-600. PubMed ID: 30883146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Duration discrimination of filled and empty auditory intervals: cognitive and perceptual factors. Rammsayer TH; Lima SD Percept Psychophys; 1991 Dec; 50(6):565-74. PubMed ID: 1780204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. What makes a rhythm complex? The influence of musical training and accent type on beat perception. Bouwer FL; Burgoyne JA; Odijk D; Honing H; Grahn JA PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0190322. PubMed ID: 29320533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Pitch and loudness interact in auditory displays: can the data get lost in the map? Neuhoff JG; Kramer G; Wayand J J Exp Psychol Appl; 2002 Mar; 8(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 12009173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Monaural loudness adaptation for middle-intensity middle-frequency signals: the importance of measurement technique. Tannen RS; Weiler EM; Warm JS; Dember WN; Simon JO J Gen Psychol; 2001 Oct; 128(4):385-99. PubMed ID: 11892887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Discrimination of random, time-varying spectra with statistical constraints. Lutfi RA J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Mar; 95(3):1490-500. PubMed ID: 8176052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The Doppler illusion: the influence of dynamic intensity change on perceived pitch. Neuhoff JG; McBeath MK J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1996 Aug; 22(4):970-85. PubMed ID: 8756963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Listeners' expectations about echoes can raise or lower echo threshold. Clifton RK; Freyman RL; Litovsky RY; McCall D J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Mar; 95(3):1525-33. PubMed ID: 8176056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Hands help hearing: facilitatory audiotactile interaction at low sound-intensity levels. Schürmann M; Caetano G; Jousmäki V; Hari R J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Feb; 115(2):830-2. PubMed ID: 15000194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Temporal decline of masking and comodulation detection differences. McFadden D; Wright BA J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):711-24. PubMed ID: 2212295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Detection of silent intervals between noises activating different perceptual channels: some properties of "central" auditory gap detection. Phillips DP; Taylor TL; Hall SE; Carr MM; Mossop JE J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jun; 101(6):3694-705. PubMed ID: 9193057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]