These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11414142)

  • 21. Individual differences in learning to perceive length by dynamic touch: evidence for variation in perceptual learning capacities.
    Withagen R; van Wermeskerken M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jan; 71(1):64-75. PubMed ID: 19304597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Direct learning in dynamic touch.
    Michaels CF; Arzamarski R; Isenhower RW; Jacobs DM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):944-57. PubMed ID: 18665737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Individual differences in distance estimation: comparison of judgments in the field with those from projected slides of the same scenes.
    Fine BJ; Kobrick JL
    Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Aug; 57(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 6622171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Perceiving the size of trees: biological form and the horizon ratio.
    Bingham GP
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 Oct; 54(4):485-95. PubMed ID: 8255711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Gravitational acceleration as a cue for absolute size and distance?
    Hecht H; Kaiser MK; Banks MS
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Oct; 58(7):1066-75. PubMed ID: 8920842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Self-training of dynamic touch: striking improves judgment by wielding.
    Stephen DG; Arzamarski R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1717-23. PubMed ID: 19933557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Taking a hands-on approach: apparent grasping ability scales the perception of object size.
    Linkenauger SA; Witt JK; Proffitt DR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Oct; 37(5):1432-41. PubMed ID: 21728460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Role of a texture gradient in the perception of relative size.
    Tozawa J
    Perception; 2010; 39(5):641-60. PubMed ID: 20677702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The role of instructions and familiar size in absolute judgments of size and distance.
    Predebon J
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Apr; 51(4):344-54. PubMed ID: 1603648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Visual perception and the guidance of locomotion without vision to previously seen targets.
    Rieser JJ; Ashmead DH; Talor CR; Youngquist GA
    Perception; 1990; 19(5):675-89. PubMed ID: 2103000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Role of feedback in the accuracy of perceived direction of motion-in-depth and control of interceptive action.
    Gray R; Regan D; Castaneda B; Sieffert R
    Vision Res; 2006 May; 46(10):1676-94. PubMed ID: 16169039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Visual inertia of rotating 3-D objects.
    Jiang Y; Pantle AJ; Mark LS
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Feb; 60(2):275-86. PubMed ID: 9529911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The role of uncertainty in the systematic spatial mislocalization of moving objects.
    Brenner E; van Beers RJ; Rotman G; Smeets JB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):811-25. PubMed ID: 16846281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Visual determinants of a cross-modal illusion.
    Armontrout JA; Schutz M; Kubovy M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1618-27. PubMed ID: 19801621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Spatial-gradient limit on perception of multiple motion.
    Hermush Y; Yeshurun Y
    Perception; 1995; 24(11):1247-56. PubMed ID: 8643330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of motion parallax and perspective cues on perceived size and distance.
    Tozawa J; Oyama T
    Perception; 2006; 35(8):1007-23. PubMed ID: 17076062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Perceived relative distance depends on the size ratio of targets in photographs.
    Takezawa T
    Perception; 2013; 42(3):282-93. PubMed ID: 23837205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Wheels: a new illusion in the perception of rolling objects.
    Vicario GB; Bressan P
    Perception; 1990; 19(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 2336336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Visual spatial illusions: a general explanation.
    Day RH
    Science; 1972 Mar; 175(4028):1335-40. PubMed ID: 5059563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Laser projection versus a CRT display in the visual perception of aircraft aspect.
    Niall KK
    Hum Factors; 2002; 44(4):630-43. PubMed ID: 12691370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.