These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11415696)

  • 1. NOVEL Award 1996: 2nd prize Tenodeses do not fully restore ankle joint loading characteristics: a biomechanical in vitro investigation in the hind foot.
    Rosenbaum D; Bertsch C; Claes LE
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 1997 Apr; 12(3):202-209. PubMed ID: 11415696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical comparison of reconstruction techniques in simulated lateral ankle ligament injury.
    Hollis JM; Blasier RD; Flahiff CM; Hofmann OE
    Am J Sports Med; 1995; 23(6):678-82. PubMed ID: 8600733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tenodeses destroy the kinematic coupling of the ankle joint complex. A three-dimensional in vitro analysis of joint movement.
    Rosenbaum D; Becker HP; Wilke HJ; Claes LE
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1998 Jan; 80(1):162-8. PubMed ID: 9460975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Calcaneal fractures cause a lateral load shift in Chopart joint contact stress and plantar pressure pattern in vitro.
    Rosenbaum D; Bauer G; Augat P; Claes L
    J Biomech; 1996 Nov; 29(11):1435-43. PubMed ID: 8894924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Intra-articular and plantar pressure distribution of the ankle joint complex in relation to foot position].
    Bertsch C; Rosenbaum D; Claes L
    Unfallchirurg; 2001 May; 104(5):426-33. PubMed ID: 11413960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How Do Hindfoot Fusions Affect Ankle Biomechanics: A Cadaver Model.
    Hutchinson ID; Baxter JR; Gilbert S; Hogan MV; Ling J; Saunders SM; Wang H; Kennedy JG
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Apr; 474(4):1008-16. PubMed ID: 26689585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative Evaluation Between Anatomic and Nonanatomic Lateral Ligament Reconstruction Techniques in the Ankle Joint: A Computational Study.
    Purevsuren T; Batbaatar M; Khuyagbaatar B; Kim K; Kim YH
    J Biomech Eng; 2018 Jun; 140(6):. PubMed ID: 29560491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Selectively attenuating soft tissues close to sites of inflammation in the peritalar region of patients with rheumatoid arthritis leads to development of pes planovalgus.
    Woodburn J; Cornwall MW; Soames RW; Helliwell PS
    J Rheumatol; 2005 Feb; 32(2):268-74. PubMed ID: 15693086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Effects of Anterolateral Tenodesis on Tibiofemoral Contact Pressures and Kinematics.
    Inderhaug E; Stephen JM; El-Daou H; Williams A; Amis AA
    Am J Sports Med; 2017 Nov; 45(13):3081-3088. PubMed ID: 28763623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanics of ankle ligament reconstruction. An in vitro comparison of the Broström repair, Watson-Jones reconstruction, and a new anatomic reconstruction technique.
    Bahr R; Pena F; Shine J; Lew WD; Tyrdal S; Engebretsen L
    Am J Sports Med; 1997; 25(4):424-32. PubMed ID: 9240973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Finite element analysis of nonanatomic tenodesis reconstruction methods of combined anterior talofibular ligament and calcaneofibular ligament deficiency.
    Zhang MY; Xu C; Li KH
    Foot Ankle Int; 2011 Oct; 32(10):1000-8. PubMed ID: 22224330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anterior lateral ankle ligament damage and anterior talocrural-joint laxity: an overview of the in vitro reports in literature.
    Kerkhoffs GM; Blankevoort L; van Poll D; Marti RK; van Dijk CN
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2001 Oct; 16(8):635-43. PubMed ID: 11535344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Biomechanical comparison of Evans procedure and Chrisman-Snook technique for the treatment of II degree lateral collateral ligament of ankle joint].
    Zhou YF; Lu XL; Lai HY; Zuo HQ; Ye C; Hong JJ
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2012 Aug; 25(8):654-7. PubMed ID: 25058957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Foot stress simulator for biomechanical in vitro studies of lower leg segments].
    Rosenbaum D; Schmitt H; Bertsch C; Bauer G; Claes L
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1996 May; 41(5):143-50. PubMed ID: 8737530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lateral instability of the ankle joint.
    Karlsson J; Lansinger O
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Mar; (276):253-61. PubMed ID: 1537162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simulated lateral ankle ligamentous injury. Change in ankle stability.
    Hollis JM; Blasier RD; Flahiff CM
    Am J Sports Med; 1995; 23(6):672-7. PubMed ID: 8600732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Arthroscopic-assisted lateral ligamentous reconstruction in combined ankle and subtalar instability.
    Lui TH
    Arthroscopy; 2007 May; 23(5):554.e1-5. PubMed ID: 17478288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical Comparison of Anterolateral Procedures Combined With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
    Inderhaug E; Stephen JM; Williams A; Amis AA
    Am J Sports Med; 2017 Feb; 45(2):347-354. PubMed ID: 28027653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surgical Considerations in the Treatment of Ankle Instability.
    Baumhauer JF; O'Brien T
    J Athl Train; 2002 Dec; 37(4):458-462. PubMed ID: 12937567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reconstruction of the lateral ankle ligaments. A biomechanical analysis.
    Colville MR; Marder RA; Zarins B
    Am J Sports Med; 1992; 20(5):594-600. PubMed ID: 1443330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.