These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11415737)

  • 1. Perceptual and biomechanical variables for running in identical shoe constructions with varying midsole hardness.
    Milani TL; Hennig EM; Lafortune MA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 1997 Jul; 12(5):294-300. PubMed ID: 11415737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Midsole material-related force control during heel-toe running.
    Kersting UG; Brüggemann GP
    Res Sports Med; 2006; 14(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 16700401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Increased vertical impact forces and altered running mechanics with softer midsole shoes.
    Baltich J; Maurer C; Nigg BM
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0125196. PubMed ID: 25897963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. CAN RUNNERS PERCEIVE CHANGES IN HEEL CUSHIONING AS THE SHOE AGES WITH INCREASED MILEAGE?
    Cornwall MW; McPoil TG
    Int J Sports Phys Ther; 2017 Aug; 12(4):616-624. PubMed ID: 28900568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of shoe wearing time and midsole hardness on ground reaction forces, ankle stability and perceived comfort in basketball landing.
    Lam WK; Liu H; Wu GQ; Liu ZL; Sun W
    J Sports Sci; 2019 Oct; 37(20):2347-2355. PubMed ID: 31221050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of body mass and midsole hardness on kinetic and perceptual variables during basketball landing manoeuvres.
    Nin DZ; Lam WK; Kong PW
    J Sports Sci; 2016; 34(8):756-65. PubMed ID: 26211423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Kinetics and perception of basketball landing in various heights and footwear cushioning.
    Wei Q; Wang Z; Woo J; Liebenberg J; Park SK; Ryu J; Lam WK
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0201758. PubMed ID: 30092009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Shoe midsole hardness, sex and age effects on lower extremity kinematics during running.
    Nigg BM; Baltich J; Maurer C; Federolf P
    J Biomech; 2012 Jun; 45(9):1692-7. PubMed ID: 22507350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Aging of running shoes and its effect on mechanical and biomechanical variables: implications for runners.
    Chambon N; Sevrez V; Ly QH; Guéguen N; Berton E; Rao G
    J Sports Sci; 2014; 32(11):1013-22. PubMed ID: 24576090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical variables and perception of comfort in running shoes with different cushioning technologies.
    Dinato RC; Ribeiro AP; Butugan MK; Pereira IL; Onodera AN; Sacco IC
    J Sci Med Sport; 2015 Jan; 18(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 24444754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of heel height and shoe insert on comfort perception and biomechanical performance of young female adults during walking.
    Hong WH; Lee YH; Chen HC; Pei YC; Wu CY
    Foot Ankle Int; 2005 Dec; 26(12):1042-8. PubMed ID: 16390637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measurements of rearfoot motion during running.
    Milani TL; Hennig EM
    Sportverletz Sportschaden; 2000 Sep; 14(3):115-20. PubMed ID: 11081248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Immediate effects of EVA midsole resilience and upper shoe structure on running biomechanics: a machine learning approach.
    Onodera AN; Gavião Neto WP; Roveri MI; Oliveira WR; Sacco IC
    PeerJ; 2017; 5():e3026. PubMed ID: 28265506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computer simulation of the effects of shoe cushioning on internal and external loading during running impacts.
    Miller RH; Hamill J
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2009 Aug; 12(4):481-90. PubMed ID: 19225961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of footwear midsole thickness on running biomechanics.
    Law MHC; Choi EMF; Law SHY; Chan SSC; Wong SMS; Ching ECK; Chan ZYS; Zhang JH; Lam GWK; Lau FOY; Cheung RTH
    J Sports Sci; 2019 May; 37(9):1004-1010. PubMed ID: 30358487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differences in Mechanical Midsole Characteristics of Running Shoes do not Influence Physiological Variables in Aerobic and Anaerobic Running.
    Mitschke C; Karger K; Milani TL
    J Hum Kinet; 2019 Oct; 69():29-38. PubMed ID: 31666886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is midsole thickness a key parameter for the running pattern?
    Chambon N; Delattre N; Guéguen N; Berton E; Rao G
    Gait Posture; 2014; 40(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 24636223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Durability of running shoes with ethylene vinyl acetate or polyurethane midsoles.
    Wang L; Hong Y; Li JX
    J Sports Sci; 2012 Dec; 30(16):1787-92. PubMed ID: 22967232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Timing of lower extremity joint actions during treadmill running.
    Hamill J; Bates BT; Holt KG
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1992 Jul; 24(7):807-13. PubMed ID: 1501566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of shoe midsole hardness on plantar pressure distribution in four basketball-related movements.
    Lam WK; Ng WX; Kong PW
    Res Sports Med; 2017; 25(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 27868427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.