155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11415788)
1. A comparison of three-dimensional lower extremity kinematics during running between excessive pronators and normals.
McClay I; Manal K
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 1998 Apr; 13(3):195-203. PubMed ID: 11415788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of changing foot progression angle using real-time visual feedback on rearfoot eversion during running.
Mousavi SH; van Kouwenhove L; Rajabi R; Zwerver J; Hijmans JM
PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0246425. PubMed ID: 33566828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of foot abduction on differences between two-dimensional and three-dimensional rearfoot motion.
McClay I; Manal K
Foot Ankle Int; 1998 Jan; 19(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 9462909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of changing mediolateral center of pressure on rearfoot eversion during treadmill running.
Mousavi SH; van Kouwenhove L; Rajabi R; Zwerver J; Hijmans JM
Gait Posture; 2021 Jan; 83():201-209. PubMed ID: 33171373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationship between rearfoot, tibia and femur kinematics in runners with and without patellofemoral pain.
Luz BC; Dos Santos AF; de Souza MC; de Oliveira Sato T; Nawoczenski DA; Serrão FV
Gait Posture; 2018 Mar; 61():416-422. PubMed ID: 29475152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of inverted orthoses on lower-extremity mechanics in runners.
Williams DS; McClay Davis I; Baitch SP
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2003 Dec; 35(12):2060-8. PubMed ID: 14652503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Application of center-of-pressure data to indicate rearfoot inversion-eversion in shod running.
Dixon SJ
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2006; 96(4):305-12. PubMed ID: 16868323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gender differences in hip and ankle joint kinematics on knee abduction during running.
Sakaguchi M; Ogawa H; Shimizu N; Kanehisa H; Yanai T; Kawakami Y
Eur J Sport Sci; 2014; 14 Suppl 1():S302-9. PubMed ID: 24444222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical Factors Associated With Achilles Tendinopathy and Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome in Runners.
Becker J; James S; Wayner R; Osternig L; Chou LS
Am J Sports Med; 2017 Sep; 45(11):2614-2621. PubMed ID: 28581815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Distinct hip and rearfoot kinematics in female runners with a history of tibial stress fracture.
Milner CE; Hamill J; Davis IS
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2010 Feb; 40(2):59-66. PubMed ID: 20118528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of neutral and stability athletic footwear on lower extremity coordination variability during a prolonged treadmill run in male rearfoot runners.
Weir G; Wyatt H; Van Emmerik R; Trudeau MB; Willwacher S; Brüggemann GP; Hamill J
Eur J Sport Sci; 2020 Jul; 20(6):776-782. PubMed ID: 31543009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical measures of hip and foot-ankle mechanics as predictors of rearfoot motion and posture.
Souza TR; Mancini MC; Araújo VL; Carvalhais VO; Ocarino JM; Silva PL; Fonseca ST
Man Ther; 2014 Oct; 19(5):379-85. PubMed ID: 24268425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Arch height and maximum rearfoot eversion during jogging in 2 static neutral positions.
Lee SY; Hertel J
J Athl Train; 2012; 47(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 22488234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Orthotic intervention in forefoot and rearfoot strike running patterns.
Stackhouse CL; Davis IM; Hamill J
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 Jan; 19(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 14659932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ASB clinical biomechanics award winner 2006 prospective study of the biomechanical factors associated with iliotibial band syndrome.
Noehren B; Davis I; Hamill J
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Nov; 22(9):951-6. PubMed ID: 17728030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of treadmill running velocity on lower extremity coordination variability in healthy runners.
Bailey JP; Freedman Silvernail J; Dufek JS; Navalta J; Mercer JA
Hum Mov Sci; 2018 Oct; 61():144-150. PubMed ID: 30092396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Coupling motion between rearfoot and hip and knee joints during walking and single-leg landing.
Koshino Y; Yamanaka M; Ezawa Y; Okunuki T; Ishida T; Samukawa M; Tohyama H
J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2017 Dec; 37():75-83. PubMed ID: 28963938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Changes in Kinematic Coupling Among the Rearfoot, Midfoot, and Forefoot Segments During Running and Walking.
Takabayashi T; Edama M; Yokoyama E; Kanaya C; Inai T; Tokunaga Y; Kubo M
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2018 Jan; 108(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 29547030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Men's and Women's World Championship Marathon Performances and Changes With Fatigue Are Not Explained by Kinematic Differences Between Footstrike Patterns.
Hanley B; Bissas A; Merlino S
Front Sports Act Living; 2020; 2():102. PubMed ID: 33345091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional kinematics of the forefoot, rearfoot, and leg without the function of tibialis posterior in comparison with normals during stance phase of walking.
Rattanaprasert U; Smith R; Sullivan M; Gilleard W
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 1999 Jan; 14(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 10619086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
