These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11418085)
1. Definition and assessment of sampling and analytical accuracy. Bartley DL Ann Occup Hyg; 2001 Jul; 45(5):357-64. PubMed ID: 11418085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The meaning of the bias uncertainty measure. Bartley DL Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Aug; 52(6):519-25. PubMed ID: 18535088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Calculating confidence intervals for prediction error in microarray classification using resampling. Jiang W; Varma S; Simon R Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2008; 7(1):Article8. PubMed ID: 18312213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Precision and accuracy: concepts and assessment by method evaluation testing. Westgard JO Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci; 1981; 13(4):283-330. PubMed ID: 7016436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bias and standard error for social reciprocity measurements. Solanas A; Leiva D; Salafranca L Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Feb; 63(Pt 1):139-61. PubMed ID: 19486549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predicting and correcting bias caused by measurement error in line transect sampling using multiplicative error models. Marques TA Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):757-63. PubMed ID: 15339299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of several methods for analyzing censored data. Hewett P; Ganser GH Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Oct; 51(7):611-32. PubMed ID: 17940277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Completeness of ascertainment by cancer registries: putting bounds on the number of missing cases. Silcocks PB; Robinson D J Public Health (Oxf); 2004 Jun; 26(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 15284320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computing confidence intervals of item fit statistics in the family of Rasch models using the bootstrap method. Su YH; Sheu CF; Wang WC J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(2):190-203. PubMed ID: 17440261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bootstrap standard error and confidence intervals for the correlation corrected for range restriction: a simulation study. Chan W; Chan DW Psychol Methods; 2004 Sep; 9(3):369-85. PubMed ID: 15355154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Methods for confidence interval estimation of a ratio parameter with application to location quotients. Beyene J; Moineddin R BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Oct; 5():32. PubMed ID: 16221306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Control for confounding in the presence of measurement error in hierarchical models. Schwartz J; Coull BA Biostatistics; 2003 Oct; 4(4):539-53. PubMed ID: 14557110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight: comparison of bias, precision and consistency using 12 different formulae. Anderson NG; Jolley IJ; Wells JE Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 30(2):173-9. PubMed ID: 17557378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance goals for the laboratory testing of antithrombin, protein C and protein S. Meijer P; Haverkate F; Kluft C Thromb Haemost; 2006 Nov; 96(5):584-9. PubMed ID: 17080214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computation of profile likelihood-based confidence intervals for reference limits with covariates. Virtanen A; Uusipaikka E Stat Med; 2008 Mar; 27(7):1121-32. PubMed ID: 17674394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prevalence in two-phase surveys: accuracy of screening procedure and corrected estimates. Morvan J; Coste J; Roux CH; Euller-Ziegler L; Saraux A; Guillemin F Ann Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 18(4):261-9. PubMed ID: 18374278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interval estimation by simulation as an alternative to and extension of confidence intervals. Greenland S Int J Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 33(6):1389-97. PubMed ID: 15319402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]